Does this look like a new user?

[wexter]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... &limit=500

[ericbarbour]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... &limit=500

Hell no. He/she/it/shit showed up September 28 and started patrolling; two days later the beast set up a CSS file for bot operation.

Sock, very likely. One of millions.

[wexter]

Here is the Twinkle connection;
He/she/them is definitely a Sock of an administrator or established user.

"20:57, 7 November 2022 diff hist +401‎ Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism ‎ Reporting 65.117.99.115. Tag: Twinkle"

[Bbb23sucks]

This user is even sketchier Probably one of the weirdest new users I have ever seen. There are so many things wrong I don't even know where to start - their username contains "(talk)" obviously in reference to Wikipedia discussion. Their first edit is to their userpage - creating it with the only text being a quote from a Wikipedia policy wrapped in a rarely used html/wikitext tag that few advanced users know about. The next four edits are more reason - just a few grammar tweaks. Then, they install tools, grind shortdescs for a bit, then install RedWarn within ten edits and immediately set advanced configurations. Install more tools, grind vandalism for a few days, then leave permanently after less than a hundred edits.

Edit: A few months later, they return and make three bizarre edits to testwiki for no discernible reason. They also made edits to Wikidata within their first few days.