Beeblebrox is an incoherent lunatic

Editors, Admins and Bureaucrats blecch!
Post Reply
User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Beeblebrox is an incoherent lunatic

Post by Graaf Statler » Mon Oct 22, 2018 11:28 pm

Poetlister wrote:Inevitably, Graaf Statler is heavily involved. Regular readers here can easily work out what is happening without bothering to read it.

Beeblebrox wrote:Well, that just vaporized any interest I had in reading it....

Nice isn't it? Now you have your one topic on sucks, Beeblebrox. And for you information, no I am not involved in that discussion, I am only listening to the arguments of Crow and Randy, that is all.
It is a good discussion, both are respectful and have real good arguments. It is how a discussion on a critical board should be. And you, yes you are invited too here. But we will never see you here, because you are not able to discuss in this way. No, you stay whit uncle Jake who protect you and with your wiki friends on the fake critical board Wikipediocrazy.

You are a nothing, Beeblebrox, not even a lunatic. You are just a coward.

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Beeblebrox is an incoherent lunatic

Post by Graaf Statler » Tue Oct 23, 2018 9:08 am

And if you want to be so kind de stront uit je ogen te halen like we say in Dutch you will see I never judge about the English wiki because I don't know the English wikipedia. And you don't speak one single word Dutch and don't know the Dutch wiki, but has a opinion about me. That is the reason I consider you as a total zero and Tim not. Tim was always friendly and respectful to me, and I was to him.

And the reason why I am on the extreem side of wikipedia criticism is different than from the others here. I think if I had been a editor on WPEN maybe I had been much more moderate.
But I am not moderated anymore after the crazy fox hunting on WPNL, Meta and by James Alexander. And the worst of all is nobody say sorry, answer any email, give one single explanation, and everybody keeps on to support the trolls who did it including WMF and it's director, lunatic what you are! There is my criticism about.

Conrads with your one topic here! Welcome to the list of total wiki fools!

(De stront uit je ogen halen means take the shit out of your eyes)

User avatar
Dysklyver
Sucks Critic
Posts: 391
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 10:14 am
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 25 times

Re: Beeblebrox is an incoherent lunatic

Post by Dysklyver » Tue Oct 23, 2018 9:52 am

Well Beeblebrox is a genuine well known Wikipedia administrator. The chances of him holding views critical of Wikipedia are pretty small. Therefore, anyone who is a critic will just fall into his "vandal - must block" filter.

He is a fairly good administrator in general as well, which just reinforces the point.

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: Beeblebrox is an incoherent lunatic

Post by CrowsNest » Tue Oct 23, 2018 10:43 am

Beeblebrox has no interest in reading this site?

Oh no. :shock:

How will I cope? How will I find the motivation to get up in the morning?

:lol:

These people. Self-obsessed and self-absorbed. In theory, RfA identifies those traits in candidates and ensures they can't become Administrators. Just another example of how Wikipedia only works in theory.

This is the hate site Beeblebrox, not Wikipediocracy. If you are so scared of what we have to say that you need to pretend we don't exist, we are doing our job. You are not the audience. You're meant to feel unwelcome, you are the embodiment of many of Wikipedia's problems. Chiefly, supreme arrogance on the part of Administrators.

As far as I can tell, his only interest in Wikipediocracy is getting his dick sucked and ego stroked, Dennis Brown/NewYorkBrad/Black Kite style. And they will happily provide that, like any faithful fan board.

Nobody here would benefit from his wisdom. From his last three public posts......

Look at this tripe......
generally MOS discussion/arguments get hyper focussed on stuff that is of minimal importance. (hyphen-vs-dash being the perfect example)
You're supposed to be writing an encyclopedia you stupid fuck. A Manual of Style is an important part of that exercise, and a Manual of Style is supposed to obsess over things like dashes or hyphens. If you don't care about that, good for you. Just don't pretend to be a functionary of an encyclopedia project.

As far as I can tell, his only purpose in being on Wikipedicoracy, is to ensure the forces of psychological control are effective......
I thought it was pretty funny myself, commenting on the absurdity of the volume of comments.
How dare people complain about the monumental mistake of Wikipedia giving JzG's horrible essay a stamp of approval? You people better stop now, Beeblebrox is watching you. Don't wanna get WP:NOTHERE blocked do you?

And is this Wikipedia criticism?
Well since we’re sharing, I actually am a drummer. But kind of in the way that people who haven’t published anything in years will tell you they are a writer. And I was ambidextrous as a small child until my first grade teacher demanded that I pick one hand and stick with it. (she got that wrong by the way, thanks Mrs. Baas)
And we have 4 vehicles in our household and 3 of them have manual transmissions.
Still, anything that keeps him away from Wikipedia is a good thing......

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... =865318253

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... =865318403

"My bad" :lol:

Who is more equipped to be writing an encyclopedia? Someone who cares about dashes, or this guy? Who is more equipped to be determining who should not be writing an encyclopedia? Someone who cares about dashes, or this guy?

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Beeblebrox is an incoherent lunatic

Post by Graaf Statler » Tue Oct 23, 2018 11:12 am

Dysklyver wrote:Well Beeblebrox is a genuine well known Wikipedia administrator. The chances of him holding views critical of Wikipedia are pretty small. Therefore, anyone who is a critic will just fall into his "vandal - must block" filter.

He is a fairly good administrator in general as well, which just reinforces the point.

I was not judging Beeblebrox is a genuine well known Wikipedia administrator, but as a critic on what they call a critical side. And in that roll he has complete failed. Like so many did.

From the first moment on I have made clear I was a editor of the Dutch wiki because my level of English was far to low to contribute on the English WMF products. In the best tradition of Wikipedia, Beeblebrox, Ming, the gender desk lady and Jake took there advance of the situtuation although it was clear that I was not talking about them. And that is what happens.

They don't speak one single word Dutch, but just like TonyBallioni did they know exactly what is going on the Dutch WMF products. And they have the guts to crack down my English. Tony even went to the Dutch arbcom, and what did our Drmies, professor Michel aka to stop them? A native Dutch speaker and a professor? To explane the misunderstanding? To tell who I really was and what kind of editor I was? Nothing except trolling.


https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Graaf_Statler&oldid=856476682

Post Reply