What is a good personal attack?

[Graaf Statler]

I write a guide for our Wikipediocrazy friends.

A good personal attack one is one what hurts. There must always contain at least a part of the true and it must, can contain real humor. No shooting blanks over someones head. Not the humor what only make your friends laughing, because you don't need to confess them you are the best. Let me help you.

First of all, never, never start to defend yourself against a personal attack, never get angry, just do one step aside and attack the person in a good way back later. Never, never start with personal attacks yourself, wait till the other starts, very important. Wait till he gets angry, doesn't have any argument and wait till he start with your mam is fat arguments.

A good personal attack must have elements what are true. If I attack Timmy I attack him on his self promotion, because that is his weak point. Because Timmy use Wikipedia to establish his name, just like Doc James does, NewYorkBrad, Katherine Maher, James Alexander, lawyer Gerlach, the famous composer Oscar van Dillen, ICT lawyer Arnoud Engelfriet, etc, etc. Because who had ever heard of them without Wikipedia? Being a important wikipedian is the best way to promote yourself if you are not even in the subtop IRL. That is the first thing to do. Second: I think he has absolute a form of Asperger but not any evidence so I ad this to the fist attack because he attacked me with a complete empty attack, you are stupide. So I have putted him down as a autistic self promoter for the world.

Vigilant is a other case. It is clear the guy has something to do with that blunder SanFanBans and he definitely need something to score something to justify his blunders. Special now I have booted all his wiki agents out of my door. In my work on wikipedia he can't find not one bad edit and his friends also not so he needs something else, he needs to proof Statler is mad but he only has a confidential rapport I am 100% mental health. What he is obesely not.

What is his weak point? He is a guy who had without out wikipedia never, never reached anything in this world. Just like Alexander and many, many other wiki career makers. So I start to play with him and let him bringing up the most rediciles arguments and accusations. At the end he start even to accuse me of living in Holland and to be a pensioner with a hobby. Great! Because that is what I need to attack him.

And now it is my time to put him down as a fat, only pizza eating autistic idiot who only knows how a naked woman looks from his common porn who needs two chairs in a airplane with a wiki addiction. Doesn't matter what is true of it, and I am much more funny than he is. And because he has used the personal attack tool in a wrong way he has no change ever to change that picture. Because his fault is not his friends are the audience, but the readers of a forum. And his friends I making laughing at him too.

"He Vigilant, do you pay 50% extra for that second chair in a airplane or 100%? And what pizza do you like the most? Pepperoni? So your ass burn the next day to give you at least any sexual sensation in your life?"

Look, that is a good personal attack. All elements I pointed out are in it, and all his friends laugh too.

I hope this small class was useful for both of you Tim an Vig. And remember the key point, never be the one who starts with personal attics. And have patient to beat back.

[Graaf Statler]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Wikipedia_Signpost/2019-04-30/Discussion_report

blah blah blah rubbish at software development blah blah blah evil capitalist pigs blah blah blah

The WMF is great at running an encyclopedia.

Wait. What?

Some facts about this so called encyclopedia......

1. It still has 3,000+ links to the Daily Mail (stealing and fabrication as a matter of routine is their businesses model, or so says Macon)

2. It still only has 0.4% of its articles rated as "Good", an internal quality rating akin to what Brittanicca would call a first draft

3. Only 10% of Wikipedia articles have more than five inline references, a reference in this measure being defined merely as a link to an external site (so can include links to the Mail etc).

4. Of the ten most important articles Wikipedia has, only one has reached "Featured" status, an internal quality measure akin to what Brittannica would call, publishable.

By any reasonable measure, including ironically most often THEIR OWN GODDAMNED MEASURES, the WMF are absolutely failing at this suppose task of "running an encyclopedia". And we know why that is, because they're not the ones who run it at all. Their responsibility for creating and curating the content begins and ends with removing illegal content, and even then only if you point it out to them.

It is morons like Macon who are supposedly building and maintaining the encyclopedia. So you probably understand now, why they would much rather prefer to pretend the pile of shit they have cobbled together so far is already an encyclopedia, and they have now entered what they laughingly like to call, the maintenance phase.

Yeahright.

Look, that was a good example of a personal attack, Vig and Timmy. Let's analyse it so you both can learn something out of it.
First of all, it hurts. it is to the point. No shooting blanks over someones head and slowly it turns to the target, Guy Macon. Who he burns complete down at the end. It has style, it is good and at a level I will never reach. Just like the two of you never will, but at least you both can learn something out of it.

[Graaf Statler]

Look, this is the result of a real good personal attack.

P.S. I assume that no readers of Wikipediocracy are mentally handicapped, an assumption I would never in a million years make about Wikipedia Sucks...

Indeed, you are for the hell not metal handicapped, just like I am not stupide Timmy! And Vig is just idiot in general and a nitwit, and for the rest I don't know anything about him, but it wouldn't surprise me if he had a form of autism. Because most of that wiki computer guys have. They believe computers can solve anything what is simple not true.
Vig started with declaring the other crazy, Tim, and not me. The only thing I did was showing what a good personal attack was and that is not what Vig and you did. I made a perfect one as you can see in this result.

If, I read if, both of you were honest guys you both just admitted the true, Vig is a computer guy who trusted computer technology blind and made tremendous blunder, and you Tim, well, lets say it in a polite way, the nobel goals of wikipedia fits your very well, isn't it? And leave personal attack in the future because both Crow and are much better, OK?

And never make again the mistake to try to convince your one people or start to make jokes only you one people like, because that is useless. Make the fool out of the other so the others start to laugh and his friends too. Make him angry, till he starts to use your mom is fat arguments, and that's the right moment to kick him strait in his balls. Then you have won. It is a simple but very effective technic. Never, never start yourself with a unsubstantiated personal attack, because you do so you are lost! That is the golden rule for a good personal attack.

[Carrite]

If I attack Timmy I attack him on his self promotion, because that is his weak point. Because Timmy use Wikipedia to establish his name, just like Doc James does, NewYorkBrad, Katherine Maher, James Alexander, lawyer Gerlach, the famous composer Oscar van Dillen, ICT lawyer Arnoud Engelfriet, etc, etc. Because who had ever heard of them without Wikipedia? Being a important wikipedian is the best way to promote yourself if you are not even in the subtop IRL. That is the first thing to do. Second: I think he has absolute a form of Asperger but not any evidence so I ad this to the fist attack because he attacked me with a complete empty attack, you are stupide. So I have putted him down as a autistic self promoter for the world.

Ummmmm, the reason you "fist attack" me as a self-promoter is because your Lord and Savior, Mr. Nest, searching for a foothold as he was falling off the cliff during our debate, decided that was something he could fabricate. And you complete stupide epigone parrot. Evidence nil. No news stories internets with Timmy name and Wikipendia mention for promotes. Fist attack complete empty.

Second guess, most original, also bad. Timmy no Aspbergers. Timmy jist like poke WikipediaSuckers trolls sometimes for entertains.

bye bye,

RfB




P.S. See: THAT'S how you do a personal attack.

[CrowsNest]

You mustn't like having fun very much then Timmy. I haven't seen you around here for ages.

[Graaf Statler]

No self promotor? Come on, Timmy. What could be a other reason you consider that bunch of idiots and typical aspies on WO as good company? Don't try to fool me Tim, you and I know they have made the door of the Pizza Hut wider there in LA so Alexander and Vigilant can pass more easy that door and they always put some extra pepper on there pizza. Without asking. Special now Alexander has left the WMF house.
Don't make the fool out of yourself, Timmy, here is nothing to laugh exept you and Vig. Because this is a real critical forum and not the joke what WO is.
Have a nice day Timmy.

[Graaf Statler]

Katie wrote:
On his userpage he says "If you need a pronoun to refer to my account" - this implies that it's different from his IRL identity. Also, by the way, Fae isn't a fan of going to a certain pub for a Wikimedia Meetup because the group who runs it is pro-Brexit and there was some pro-Brexit literature in there during a tour by the CEO. I am not a fan of Brexit myself, but I consider his reasoning silly. He seriously says "Choosing this venue remains a political act and it is not an appropriate safe space for Wikimeets" in this edit: link. I highly doubt the choosing of the venue was in any way political - more likely, someone thought it was a good pub to go to because they'd been there in the past.


Vigtroll wrote:
Ashley has learned that if he stirs up dramah, he can get his way by exhausting all reasonable people.
He's done this for a decade and only once been called out by ARBCOM.

He's a consistent shit stirrer who delights in faux outrage and martyrdom.
Whenever he thinks he's winning in a fight, he will universally attempt to leverage that 'win' into a position of bullying others.

I've watched him do it time and again.
Only in the madhouse of en.wp and commons is this tolerated.

Here, here we start to see what WMF, Wikipedia and WO really is. A kindergarten with a bunch of guy's with a mind of a twelve year child, just like that Vigilant guy. Who should sit at home all the day claying if WMF and wikipedia was not there to kept the whole circus alive with a sick amount of donor money what they burn in the fire place. Is that good company according to you, Timmy? Is that the company you are looking for Timmy?