Tisane got his little white ass nailed again

[ericbarbour]

it's bizarre that no one's revealing what happened to him. If he is dead, then the US Attorney is trying to cover it up. Perhaps some kind of misconduct by prison officials was involved?

[wexter]

Yes, as was pointed out here, the case was dismissed because he is dead!
Unfortunately, and no conspiracy, in this Country you cannot prosecute a dead person.
It would be quite fun to drag corpses into trial.
Of course, There is a fight on the talk page debating the issue of his death!

The "compromise" reached by the Wiki-idiots is that the case was dismissed, as it would just be too easy to be factual by using a primary source that is readily available. Wikipedia is once again 1) entirely wrong to content 2) fact resistant. Once again we have proof that only .17% of Wikipedia articles are accurate "enough."


Why does a liber-turd (worse than a liber-tard) entitled to have a so called "encyclopedia" page in the first place?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... olitician)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... candidate)

it's bizarre that no one's revealing what happened to him. If he is dead, then the US Attorney is trying to cover it up. Perhaps some kind of misconduct by prison officials was involved?

No, "the powers that be" are just slow..pokes

Date of Death: 09/18/2022 Manner of Death: Pending Medical Examiner Report Ready: No

The compromise reached by the Wiki-idiots is that the case was dismissed, as it would just be too easy to be factual.

Some real gems in Larson's Wikipedia page;

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nathan_La ... olitician)

As the author of "How To Psyche Yourself Up To Feel Entitled to Rape," Larson was ideally qualified to be a Wikipedia editor.....

Larson admitted to raping his ex-spouse, who was transgender and committed suicide after the birth of their daughter.[

Larson pleaded guilty to sending a letter in December 2008 to the U.S. Secret Service threatening to kill the President of the United States.

Larson began editing Wikipedia under his real name in 2005, contributing to articles in an attempt to make taboo or illegal topics, including child sexual abuse, culturally acceptable. He began using sock puppet accounts to promote decriminalizing child sexual abuse. He was banned from the site in 2008.

At least Monty Python had a skit ready to go for the Wiki-idiots editing the Larson Page


CART MASTER Bring out your dead! Bring out your dead! Nine pence.
CUSTOMER: Here's one.
CART MASTER: Nine pence.
DEAD PERSON: I'm not dead!
CART MASTER: What?
CUSTOMER: Nothing. Here's your nine pence.
DEAD PERSON: I'm not dead!
CART MASTER: 'Ere. He says he's not dead!
CUSTOMER: Yes, he is.
DEAD PERSON: I'm not!
CART MASTER: He isn't?
CUSTOMER: Well, he will be soon. He's very ill.
DEAD PERSON: I'm getting better!
CUSTOMER: No, you're not. You'll be stone dead in a moment.
CART MASTER: Oh, I can't take him like that. It's against regulations.
DEAD PERSON: I don't want to go on the cart!
CUSTOMER: Oh, don't be such a baby.
CART MASTER: I can't take him.
DEAD PERSON: I feel fine!
CUSTOMER: Well, do us a favor.
CART MASTER: I can't.
CUSTOMER: Well, can you hang around a couple of minutes? He won't be long.

[ericbarbour]

Ah, some clarity. A commentor on Eivind Berge's (extremely insane/toxic) blog entry posted a link to the Maricopa County Coroner's website, and the case number. Looks like they were right--and I still suspect the US Attorney is trying to cover it up, possibly because he was murdered while in custody. Or something else questionable happened to him.

Ya know what? Someone should probably add this to his Wikipedia article, maybe?...... (just joking, let Wikipedia be inaccurate, heh heh)

Anonymous Jeffrey said...
The Medical Examiner's Office of Maricopa County, Arizona, has now confirmed Nathan Larson's death.
https://omecasestatus.maricopa.gov/
Type in the case number: 2022-09737
Thursday, October 06, 2022 3:42:00 PM

NathanLarsonDeath.png (42.3 KiB) Viewed 2756 times

[ericbarbour]

Even funnier: Wikipediocracy started following this. And they are spluttering about "reliable sources". As usual.

Let me guess: they will claim that the Maricopa County medical examiner's website is not WP:RS.

http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtop ... 90#p316590

[ericbarbour]

The hell with WO, the most concentrated dose of Wiki-Autism is now on the talkpage.

Screenshot 2022-10-13 at 13-41-43 Talk Nathan Larson (politician) - Wikipedia.png (129.07 KiB) Viewed 2720 times

Screenshot 2022-10-13 at 13-42-05 Talk Nathan Larson (politician) - Wikipedia.png (180.38 KiB) Viewed 2720 times

And what does that consummate Wikipedia Nerdoid Sucker and rulebook-tosser, Aoidh, like to edit? Predictable things. Buford, Georgia is probably his hometown.

Screenshot 2022-10-13 at 13-52-41 Aoidh - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org) - Edit Counter - XTools.png (33.63 KiB) Viewed 2720 times

[wexter]

He is not dead yet!

Adding to the many things which are incorrect in the Nathan Larson article.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nathan_La ... olitician)

1) was the guy really a "politician" given the libertarians have three hundred minor office holders scattered here and there, with only one holding "state office" and nobody elected whatsoever to the Federal level of governance. Libertarians are the transgenders of another brother; a very small and irrelevant group of folks making lots of noise and thus generating click-bait profits. Even the "Rent is Too Damn High" party had more moxy than libertarians.

Rent is too damn high;

McMillan uses humor to promote the party's message, especially utilizing what the Christian Science Monitor has described as "theatrics", including "a booming voice, fast-paced patter ... and copious facial hair", as well as frequent jokes.[11] Although the party adopts a jocular and tongue-in-cheek image, the party has focused primarily on serious welfare issues and avoided outright satire, precluding it from being considered a frivolous political party.

Burt the only libertarian in "high office, not!" Ernie must be serving as a dog catcher in butt/fuck USA.

Burt is the first Libertarian candidate to be elected to a state legislature since Steve Vaillancourt in 2000, and the first third-party candidate elected to the Wyoming Legislature in over 100 years.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshall_Burt

2) Evidently, A primary source cannot be used as "proof of death" even though that is very clear as stand alone proof let alone with the additional proof found in the dismissal of charges. He is not dead yet according to Wikipedia.

YET, Primary sources in the article abound indicating that the sin of "original research" has been committed.

This is an example of a illegal/taboo reference;

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... no-og=true

Even where "the rent is too damn high" primary source references were swiftly deleted;

McMillan is among ethicists opposed to [[sex reassignment surgery]] without the highly informed consent of the [[intersex]] child, stating on his website: "They are normal human beings [...] just born different."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.jimmymcmillan.org/id26.html |title=Transgender |publisher=Jimmymcmillan.org |access-date=2011-02-18 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110216051 ... /id26.html |archive-date=2011-02-16 }}</ref><ref>[http://gawker.com/5667450/meet-jimmy-mc ... high-party Meet Jimmy McMillan, Founder and ‘CEO’ of the Rent Is 2 Damn High Party] Gawker, October 19, 2010</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=Mark W. Watson says |url=http://yesbuthowever.com/new-york-state ... s-5000053/ |title="Rent is 2 Damn High" Party Candidate Steals NY Governors' Debate (Video) |publisher=Yes, But, However! |date=2010-10-19 |access-date=2011-02-18}}</ref><ref>[http://www.autostraddle.com/rieses-team ... igh-party/ Riese’s Team Pick: Jimmy McMillan for The Rent is Too Damn High Party] Autostraddle, October 20, 2010</ref>

So what am I saying;

1) Wikipedia is arbitrary (and bat shit crazy)
2) Wikipedia has no rules or process
3) Presenting facts on Wikipedia is impossible
4) There is no critical thinking on the platform
5) All of the articles are incorrect in part or whole and that is easily provable

The Rent of Wikipedia is too damn high!



@4:14 The Crown Heights hood, My birthplace, lol

[ericbarbour]

1) Wikipedia is arbitrary (and bat shit crazy)
2) Wikipedia has no rules or process
3) Presenting facts on Wikipedia is impossible
4) There is no critical thinking on the platform
5) All of the articles are incorrect in part or whole and that is easily provable

You got it. Their database is crawling with "original research" and "unreliable sources" and "primary sources" and other abuses.

One of this forum's oldest threads is now up to 29 pages of paid-editing and COI abuse, with flaky sources abounding. Further abuses/incompetence can be found in the crap articles thread. Now up to 30 pages. And that barely scratches the surface--just random examples stumbled across while looking for something else. But the few shitheads who even care about the Larson article will cheerfully die on their idiotic hill of "reliable sourcing".

For The Glorious Wiki!

[wexter]

Their database is crawling with "original research" and "unreliable sources" and "primary sources" and other abuses.

Bottom line, nearly every article in the "authoritative source of information" can easily be proven to be incorrect to fact either in whole or part.

Its easy to find two entries on the same topic that say entirely different things (with fact marginalized to the lesser article lost in the periphery);

Marquis de Sade, an 18th-century French writer from whom the term sadism derives
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sadist

And the main article where folks have been begging (in talk) to correct the article for a decade without result;

Meaning of "sadism" From the article: "The namesake of the psychological and subcultural term sadism, his name is used variously to evoke sexual violence, licentiousness and freedom of speech." Perhaps, but how about the libidinous infliction of pain, cruelty, and torture? As it stands, the statement is inadequate. Unfree (talk) 18:42, 1 August 2009
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Marq ... sm%22(UTC)

With Britannica being correct, concise, factual, and consistent across pages

sadism, psychosexual disorder in which sexual urges are gratified by the infliction of pain on another person. The term was coined by the late 19th-century German psychologist Richard von Krafft-Ebing in reference to the Marquis de Sade,https://www.britannica.com/topic/sadism

French nobleman whose perverse sexual preferences and erotic writings gave rise to the term sadism.
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Ma ... 0de%20Sade

Wikipedia is just wrong..

[Jennsaurus]

Pretty horrible person it sounds like. Also, confirmed dead

https://abc30.com/nathan-larson-child-s ... /12339548/

[ericbarbour]

his death wasn't put on the article to last until Oct 15, when Newsweek ran an item....

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... 1115778524

And there's Drmies being his usual petty self

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... 1118067791