Drmies

Editors, Admins and Bureaucrats blecch!
User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Drmies

Post by Graaf Statler » Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:23 am

Drmies is fantastic, and must be the lighten example for every Dutch wikipedian and Wikipedia-NL. Because I am thinking about the campagne #Wikipedia back to sender. Effeietsanders is already there and Drmies too and my plan is to collect money to send the hole Wikipedia Dutch cabal and Wikipedia-NL and WMNL back to sender.
It seems Americans love this kind of complete idiots and we are ride of them. We just export them just like we did with our Drmies!

We can organize a big bye bye party in there office in Utrecht, than they all are going with buses to Schiphol, Amsterdam airport. And than Business class to SanFan where they are reunited with Jimmy, James Alexander Effe, Drmies and of course Katherine Maher with a banner with welcome Dutch fuckt checkerrrrrs, and all the other wikifools. As a welcome committee on SanFan airport. The little Ymnes will love it!
Well, and it seems the Americans like our export Wikipedians so much, so I should say everybody will be happy. We are ride of this complete idiots and Wikipedia has fresh blood in America.
This plan is the best example of a pure win-win situation there is!

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: Drmies

Post by CrowsNest » Tue Sep 25, 2018 11:50 am

Look how nice he can be.....

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... =861081510

Too scared to be himself in front of an Arbitration clerk.

A coward and a bully.

It says everything about Wikipedia that these are the sort of people who always escape scrutiny, or are just ignored, even at the highest level.

The cost? As well as the obvious, as shown in two sections above that, letting an arrogant piece of shit like Drmies be all he can be, has lesser side effects too. Stuff like forcing innocent users to leave messages like this....
Hi Drmies - I've got the following message when I try to use account creator on my phone: "Account creation from IP addresses in the range 94.197.120.0/23, which includes your IP address (94.197.121.234), has been blocked by Drmies. The reason given by Drmies is Vandalism: a-holery persists in trolling unblock requests". I assume this is because my IP address on the phone is close to someone else's? I've never done anything with unblock requests before. Would it be possible to get this fixed, or to get my specific IP removed from the block please? Zeromonk (talk) 07:34, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
I wonder, does he ever leave notes like that in official records when doing his actual job? I'm guessing there might be a risk, since it's obvious he is doing wiki stuff while at work, so he will be in that mindset. You can see how it would be difficult to switch between the two, at least quickly. And if he can manage it, maybe his employer might like to know that for some of the time Drmies is in his office, he is being paid to transition between his Wikipedia persona and his real world persona. On that note, it must be quite hard for him to have to pretend to be normal around his colleagues, his Wikipedia persona clearly being his more natural state.

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: Drmies

Post by CrowsNest » Tue Sep 25, 2018 6:59 pm

More classic Drmies.
Drmies—Vincent van Gogh wouldn't be a contemporary artist. Bus stop (talk) 04:29, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Really. Drmies (talk) 14:06, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
If Drmies finds himself in a difficult spot, such as being exposed as not remotely capable of commenting on an issue that requires knowledge of what contemporary art is, he'll just be a sarcastic prick.

User avatar
Dysklyver
Sucks Critic
Posts: 391
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 10:14 am
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 25 times

Re: Drmies

Post by Dysklyver » Fri Sep 28, 2018 6:27 pm

Drmies wrote:MorbidStories, a few comments. First of all I blocked you temporarily for that "scumbag filth" comment. I don't know how you thought that would ever be an OK thing to say here: this isn't the internet, and those comments are indeed "unpleasant, aggressive and intimidating". Second, you are lucky that Ritchie and Tony responded here first, because I would have seriously considered an indefinite BLP block for the sourcing and, given the Clint Hill edit, for blatant incompetence. Third, -- be happy I don't have a third right now. Drmies (talk) 14:32, 28 September 2018 (UTC)


" this isn't the internet "

Yeah we all knew you were somewhere else mate, have fun in cloud cuckoo land. :roll:

Wikipedia is on the internet, it is literally a website, no one can be this thick!

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: Drmies

Post by CrowsNest » Fri Sep 28, 2018 6:56 pm

He's hilarious. I bet you could find an example of Drmies saying that exact phase. He has certainly said similar, on numerous occasions. But he gets away with it. None so blind as those who will not see.

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: Drmies

Post by CrowsNest » Tue Oct 02, 2018 2:40 am

:o :roll:
I wish editors who don't hang around in article space (or other more social circles) much anyway would leave the others alone. Drmies (talk) 15:40, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Firstly, that's a fucking horrible comment on it itself.

Secondly, it's just factually wrong (user has 62% namespace edits)......

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&offset=20180922092106&limit=500&contribs=user&target=Pkbwcgs&namespace=0&tagfilter=&start=&end=

.....and Christ knows what the creepy fucker meant by "more social circles", but they also have 20% edits to talk space too)

But what truly elevated this out of the realm of the usual Drmies assholery was the fact the user has a giant banner on their user page saying they are feeling discouraged and are semi-retired, and hopes others will help make them feel better.

Drmies clearly didn't bother to look before saying this about a fellow editor. Had he done more than just look, he might have also seen that they only recently removed the template that warns they are experiencing mental health issues.

I do wonder if it will take someone like this actually slitting their wrists before anyone sits down and takes a close look at how Drmies treats other people. He is a proper cunt and no mistake.

And if you're perhaps wondering if maybe there was a good reason for why Drmies said such a horrible thing, well, come on, if you've read this thread you just know there wouldn't have been. Even for the fucked up world of Wikipedia, where everything gets distorted and magnified, this was a trivial incident which absolutely didn't warrant that blatant and obvious violation of WP:AGF and any other policy whose essential meaning is 'hey, you, wanna not be such a cunt today maybe?'

This was the trigger.....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... :Drmies/A7

Not for the first time, a dumb joke between Wiki assholes, which they assume isn't doing anyone any harm, proves to be a source of harm because it cluttered up maintenance reports that people who Drmies clearly thinks are social weirdos use to quietly go about the business of maintaining Wikipedia.

I say not for the first time because you could maybe excuse Drmies not knowing that his massive ignorance about what is and is not a problem, is itself a problem for others, if it had only happened once. It has happened twice now that I know of, the other case being 'joke' user categories, which probably means it has happened four or five times at the very least. He's not a slow learner, he is just that sort of cunt.

Anyway, here's a list of all the people who had a right good laugh about it all on Drmies' talk page......

-TonyBallioni
-Shock Brigade Harvester Boris
-SerialNumber54129
-Penny Lane 123
-Gerda Arendt
-Martinevans123
-Softlavender
-K.e.coffman
-Doug Weller

Never heard of Penny Lane, but the rest are, of course, all well known cunts. Birds of a feather flock together on Wikipedia. Oh, and Penny Lane was of course a HILARIOUS joke fake signature by Martinevans. My God these people crack you up don't they?

It's to die for.......

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: Drmies

Post by CrowsNest » Tue Oct 02, 2018 3:22 pm

Drmies lecturing people on how to react to racist edits/editors....

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... ssible_R/D

Apparently you have to scream RACIST and type ADMIN ALERT in edit summaries. You have to picture yourself being willing to start a fight with someone.

He's trying to convey a "hint of rage" in his displeasure at how these inferior patrollers handled their Wikipedia business.

All very Drmies. Totally deaf to complaints from those he's lecturing that he could maybe express himself differently, take into account their lack of experience, or consider that other people don't think screaming in edit summaries or calling people racist dicks is either professional or effective.

I wonder if any of these people know about the time Drmies falsely accused an editor of racism, then carried on his rage curled pursuit for months until he could successful block them over an unrelated incident, then claimed he was totally uninvolved? That he only did this on behalf of the equally psychotic Malik Shabbaz, who Drmies was upset got blocked for making racist personal attacks in a bizarre episode of what we now know is the Sarah Jeong defence.

Maybe someone should tell them.

User avatar
Dysklyver
Sucks Critic
Posts: 391
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 10:14 am
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 25 times

Re: Drmies

Post by Dysklyver » Wed Oct 03, 2018 1:57 pm

CrowsNest wrote:He's hilarious. I bet you could find an example of Drmies saying that exact phase. He has certainly said similar, on numerous occasions. But he gets away with it. None so blind as those who will not see.


https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TonyBallioni&diff=862227010&oldid=862226938

" Besides, this is the internet. "

:roll:

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: Drmies

Post by CrowsNest » Wed Oct 03, 2018 2:32 pm

I was actually thinking of "scumbag fiilth", but well found anyway. There's a difference in context of course, but it is clear he wants to see Wikipedia as part of the internet when it suits, and not when it doesn't.

It does also make it hard to reconcile his edit here....

https://www.wikipediasucks.co/forum/vie ... 6317#p6317

....in that he accepts that on the internet links break all the time, but thinks including a pre-emptive archive link adds nothing to a Wikipedia article.

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: Drmies

Post by CrowsNest » Thu Oct 04, 2018 2:37 am

Another timely example of his hypocrisy. C.f. the post above where he chews out RC patrollers for not being aggressive enough to racists, where he specifically chastised them for relying on templates that warn for the wrong thing, that they should instead be using hand crafted messages like 'get the fuck out of here you racist dick'....

Well, guess who just used this boilerplate template to notify the blocked User:Kill all Democrats and feminists
October 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Drmies (talk) 23:55, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Useless asswipe.

Oh, and for good measure, this seems to be one of those classic technical screw ups he's been having lately, since it doesn't appear the block has even been placed.

Post Reply