Jimmy Wales vs. Cullen328

Editors, Admins and Bureaucrats blecch!
User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: Jimmy Wales vs. Cullen328

Post by CrowsNest » Sun Jun 02, 2019 7:07 pm

I much prefer Original Jimbo to Fake Jimbo....
Oppose [indefinite block] Yes, I wish that Malik Shabazz would refrain from combative responses. However, he has been harassed quite severely for years. He is a highly productive content contributor who has deep expertise in quite a few controversial topic areas. He is not a civil POV pusher. He is a genuine encyclopedist. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 04:49, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
What an absolute piece of shit.

It hardly needs pointing out, other than this "wish", not one word, literally not one, of this utter fucking garbage, comes from Wikipedia policy. Not one. But hey, what would Wikipedia be if its most respected Administrators actually cared about what a silly thing like policy says?

You know what they should care about? You know what Real Jimmy Wales would probably be most displeased to learn of.....Malik's supposed expertise includes all things Jewish. Because he's a Jew. Yes, that is what Wikipedia calls expertise. Despite this, an example of how he uses it, is to call an Administrator who blocked him for perfectly legitimate reasons, the "good German". Presumably because he is German, and because, as he has made it quite clear, he believes he is being persecuted by the Administration. Now you also know why Malik's enablers are happy to call the Administrators who enforce policy on him, "fascists".

Jimmy once blocked an Administrator for calling an editor a 'little shit". To make sure everyone knew that it was important to hold them to the highest standards. Fast forward to today, and we got this Administrator doing this, excusing the most disgusting of slurs as "combative", treated as if it is completely normal behaviour, indeed hailed as the best standard of Administrator they have.

This is what the "best" Administrators of Wikipedia look like today. Their idea of protecting someone from harassment, is to let them be an Ultra Asshole, as vile as it is possible to be, to the unfortunate people who haven't done anything to him except enforce Wikipedia policy.

If you were a Wikipedia Administrator and you weren't raised like Jim Heaphy was, would you lift a damn finger to protect such a person from harassment?

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: Jimmy Wales vs. Cullen328

Post by CrowsNest » Sun Jun 02, 2019 9:02 pm

Actually, what the fuck, now I look back it was this "one of their very best" fucker who went out of his way to endorse the "fascist" bullshit.
Strikes me as a wee bit fascist to say that an admin cannot be called corrupt. But Malik, youre helping certain people succeed here. I wont make it personal so as to avoid the claim I am personally attacking anyone, but you know there are people whose only value brought to Wikipedia is trying to remove those who provide actual value (eg you). Im hoping you dont make it easier on them. nableezy - 21:57, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

What Nableezy said. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 03:44, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
This fucking guy.

If Jimmy can't clean house, others will have to do it for him.

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: Jimmy Wales vs. Cullen328

Post by CrowsNest » Sat Jun 08, 2019 1:20 am

I will try to be less snarky. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 17:53, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
As seen with the events of the previous two forums posts, featuring comments he made shortly after this one, what this stupid fuck wishes, bears no resemblance to what actually happens.

ONE OF THEIR BEST...... :lol: :roll:

User avatar
Anyone
Sucks Critic
Posts: 307
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2019 5:20 pm
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Jimmy Wales vs. Cullen328

Post by Anyone » Sat Jun 08, 2019 7:13 am

A while ago I came across Cullen on QUORA.

I did a search for Wikipedia and noticed that Eric Corbett replies once in a while. His replies are generally quite sensible. Another guy who replies is Jim Heaphy [Cullen]. He claimed to be an admin on Wikipedia, so I checked him out. This is his profile page:

https://www.quora.com/profile/Jim-Heaphy

Notice how he spends most of his time replying to questions about sex. I decided to investigate. Here are some of the questions Cullen replies to.

1. What are some ways I can pleasure my boyfriend in bed without intercourse?

The answers are collapsed [because they're crap], but can be uncollapsed by clicking. Cullen's answer:

You can massage his penis with lubricant. You can lick and suck his penis. If you have fairly large breasts, you can allow him to stroke his penis in your cleavage, using lubricant. You can kiss him and hug him and caress him and dry hump him. Keep your panties on as a precaution if you are all over him, though.

https://www.quora.com/What-are-some-ways-I-can-pleasure-my-boyfriend-in-bed-without-intercourse

2. As a male, when was the first time you masturbated and ejaculated?

Cullen's answer:

I do not remember my exact age but I was probably about 12 or 13 years old. This was about 55 years ago and there was no porn and information about sex was hard to get. I used to go to the library and read books about human biology especially the chapters about human reproduction. There were also some cheap paperback novels that had some sex scenes. I fantasized about the bodies of beautiful nude girls and about having intercourse with them, and I would get erections. I stroked my penis dry on several occasions and was not able to have an orgasm. I knew nothing about vaginal lubrication and how wonderful slippery sex is. I just gave up after a while.

I got a bad chest cold and had to stay home resting in my bedroom. My mother gave me a jar of Vicks Vapo-Rub to put on my nose and my chest. I was lazing around in bed, relaxing and fantasizing and started thinking about beautiful nude girls and having sex with one of them and I got erect. I started rubbing my penis and to my surprise, the slippery Vicks felt really great on my penis. I got another glob of Vicks onto my hand and continued rubbing. My pleasure rose and rose and got extreme and my fantasies got much more explicit and I started bucking my hips. All of a sudden, my pleasure skyrocketed and I had an intensely pleasurable orgasm and ejaculated profusely. My life changed at that moment and I knew with absolute certainty that I would be pursuing orgasms for the rest of my life.


https://www.quora.com/As-a-male-when-was-the-first-time-you-masturbated-and-ejaculated

==========

So now you know. When Cullen's not making a jerk of himself on Wikipedia, he's probably over on Quora talking about his willy.

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Jimmy Wales vs. Cullen328

Post by Graaf Statler » Sat Jun 08, 2019 10:22 am

CrowsNest wrote:If Jimmy can't clean house, others will have to do it for him.

Once Jimmy said I blew a lot of thinks in my life, but I want to make Wikipedia to a succes. Well, if Jimmy does't want to see his wikipedia change in one big inferno the only right thing he can do is to give others at least the change to held a massive clean up. He has the nuclear key in his hand, he is the one who can stop this madness. You can't run the ultimate trollopedia with a few pirates with pirate flags in there hand and a bunch of extreem frustrated gender bitches, male and female. That ends up in a confrontations with governments what you simple can't win. Because if you don't listen to them they put you simple in jail at the end, what they always did with pirates.

Governing by shitstorm to repeat the words of Alex Voss is simple not tolerated in Europe, and it never was and it never will be tolerated. Europe is simple not a continent ruled by it's civilians, that is a big mistake to think that . A American foundation simple can't change anything here, not the law's, not our mentality, not the man woman relations, nothing. And if you try that and don't listen at the end they do the same what they always did in the history with pirates, they chop their heads off. No matter how many gold pieces they have. Ask Varoufakis, ask the Greeks who are still eating grass.

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: Jimmy Wales vs. Cullen328

Post by CrowsNest » Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:14 pm

Jimmy can't do shit. Is the point. Look at the beginning of this thread. The Wikipedians lose their fucking minds whenever he says anything remotely critical of those who would be his successor. Cullen thinks Malik is just a little bit combative, and even then is only prepared to expend wishes to remedy it. Not even the media catching on to what has happened, using examples of what Malik gets away with, would be enough to give Jimmy the power to correct Wikipedia's course.I

Change might happen if one of the scum Cullen considers good people gets their teeth into Jess Wade, who is already in pieces at the extremely mild push back she has received thus far. But already it seems like the scum are too scared to go after the media darlings of the movement. Easier to beat the crap out of less connected potential victims, and leave the professional victims alone.

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Jimmy Wales vs. Cullen328

Post by Graaf Statler » Sat Jun 08, 2019 8:30 pm

CrowsNest wrote:Jimmy can't do shit. Is the point. Look at the beginning of this thread.

I did.
CrowNest wrote:As for you Jimmy, just learn the lesson already. These people are scum. Wikipediastan, they're not sending us their best and brightest. They cannot be brought back into line, if they were ever really in line. They cannot be reasoned with, guilt tripped, brow beaten. There is but one law to these people. If you can get way with it, do it.

You are dammed right Crow. And Abd on Discord was right too, it scares me. It is some strange complete out of control of running complex. A kind of digital Tsjernobyl, everybody has lost the controle over it and it is moving in the direction of a meltdown. We all are looking at it and nobody can do anything anymore. Nobody, also Jimmy not.
Scaring, like I said before.

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: Jimmy Wales vs. Cullen328

Post by CrowsNest » Sun Jun 09, 2019 12:42 am

I have blocked SkepticalRaptor for 24 hours for this BLP violation. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 22:16, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
The violation? Calling someone an anti-science, pseudoscience-pushing right-wing "journalist."

SkepticalRaptor's defence of course is that you can find reliable sources which support this view. Maybe not to the point it is inarguable, but enough to transition this from being an outright case of defamation and push it toward legitimate characterisation of a significant viewpoint. Their username explains why they landed where they did.

This makes me laugh, because the incident that triggered this thread, was Jimmy chiding Cullen for accusing a Wikipedia editor of "pursuing a crank agenda". Someone who, to my knowledge, has never been written about in such terms in reliable sources, but does use their real name to edit Wikipedia (and so is entitled to the full protection of BLP, even more so than the public figure being talked about above).

One of their best eh? Best at do as I say not as I do clearly. 'Twas ever thus......although only a rare few have taken their right to do so all the way to the very top.

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: Jimmy Wales vs. Cullen328

Post by CrowsNest » Sun Jun 09, 2019 1:07 am

Worth noting too that the notorious Guy Chapman has said on that very same talk page....
Since the sources establish that her "work" in this area is unreliable, I think we are done here. Guy (Help!) 01:09, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Everything [the BLP subject] says about vaccines is attested by reliable sources to be dangerously wrong, and we're not going to leave the reader in any doubt about that. Guy (Help!) 10:08, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

It should be apparent to you by now that you should avoid articles on antivaxers like the plagues they promote. Guy (Help!) 17:52, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

There is no possible doubt that her reporting is false. In fact, it's been called anti-vaccine propaganda. BLP only mandates accuracy, not deference to lies. Guy (Help!) 20:55, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Fair point, far-right hyper-partisan would be a better description of Sinclair [the BLP subject's current employer]. It's way to the right of Fox. Guy (Help!) 18:39, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

So either one of their best has just wrongly blocked an editor for merely summarizing what Chapman had previously said about this BLP subject, or Chapman, one of the other one of their bests was running around on that page committing BLP violations and this one of their best did jack all about it, not then, and not now (since if they are violations, redaction is still in order at the very least, and a warning to Chapman, should he ever crawl out of his hole).

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Jimmy Wales vs. Cullen328

Post by Graaf Statler » Sun Jun 09, 2019 10:58 am

Wikipedia is the complete victory of the mediocrity, isn't it Crow? Because wie voor een dubbeltje geboren is, wordt nooit een kwartje, He who is born for a dime, will never be worth a quarter, not even with the help of Wikipedia.
It is sad and extreem depressing because in this way all these people pull themself down. Wikipedia is a trap, never take a bite of that apple because it wil poison you and destroy your soul at the end.

Post Reply