Wikipedia Sucks!

No Ledge on WO wrote:Wikipedia, with its anarchial governance, is a guardian of democracy on the Internet (at least as long as the WMF doesn't step in and "superprotect").

No No Ledge. Wikipedia is a bureaucracy and an oligopoly, there is now even a Phd study about. And the rules of wikipedia with a powerful, untouchable bureaucracy, astroturfing, gaslighting, trolling, sock farms, and name it is not where I am thinking of by the word democraty......
WMF is just what we call a papieren tiger, a tiger out of paper, they can do nothing because at the moment they do something section 230 is worthless. And they have the full exposure of the resposbillety.

Another insider with extreme cowardice, using WO to glorify The Mighty Wiki and knock everyone else. Asshole.

He's an ideas guy, more beloved on WO than WP. Just unfortunate his ideas are shit, and he can't really handle it being pointed out, even in the most polite of terms. Dreams for a better tomorrow, while pretending like he isn't a very small part of the reason the Wikipedia of today sucks. Think Carrite, but at least smart enough to make Admin.