No Melanie, NOBODY but you gets the irony of how Section 353 of a Wikipedia talk page, a perfectly sensible request to archive it, met with the usual sarcastic bullshit reply, increased its length by one whole section.Does no one notice this irony: one of the things that makes your talk page so big, is all the notes from people complaining that your talk page is too big? (BTW the reason you were graced with a custom "archive this" notice instead of a template is because the user got a lot of grief for templating me to archive my talk page. Even though mine is a tiny seedling compared to your magnificent tree here.) -- MelanieN (talk) 22:49, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
As any moron can see, if they have the time and the computing resources, more space is taken up on that page by people encouraging the child and thumbing their noses at the very idea they could ever not be a giant asshole, than serious requests to archive.
The fact this is now only Section 190 is what I find hilarious about this whole farce......
It is perhaps the funniest the court jester has ever been, inadvertently of course, getting a woman editor make a fat joke at her own expense.Please don't archive your talk page
I like spending an hour scrolling down to converse with you. Helps me keep the fat off my arm. .... Lourdes 03:52, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
As for Melanie being worse than the men, here's what a prototypical crap male Administrator (Tony Ballioni, of course, as anyone might have guessed) did about the complaint.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... =887940416
Arrogant? Yes. Hostile? Yes. Flouting policy? Yes.
But no sarcastic fawning addition. No active encouragement of the silliness, no rewarding of the child, no reinforcement of the toxic insider culture dynamic, just the simple Big Stick endorsement of a corrupt father figure silently watching over his problem child, and of course the problem child frustrating even his father's efforts to keep him out of trouble....
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... =887940631
It's one thing to be a bad Dad. Even worse to be a bad Mother. But to be a shit mother who also engages in cringeworthy attempts to join in the fun of their misbehaving children?
I bet she's heavily involved in outreach too, pretending like she gives a shit about Wikipedia's gender and cultural problems. Actually, probably not. They never are, these types. Unsurprisingly, she is, of course, a Kupdung pick for Administrator. God he really does know an entitled piece of shit when he sees one, doesn't he? Like looking in a mirror.
She is the fucking problem, her and all the gender traitors just like her. Shitheels like Tony are easy to deal with by comparison. He did this, it's wrong for this reason, he doesn't care, so now you know, stay the fuck away from that place if you have any sense. But this? Where do you even begin communicating what it really is, to an outsider. You need Freud for that shit.