RexxS for Adminship

Editors, Admins and Bureaucrats blecch!
User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: RexxS for Adminship

Post by CrowsNest » Wed May 08, 2019 9:34 am

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Wikipedians can be so unintentionally cruel sometimes....

ONE OF THESE THINGS IS NOT LIKE THE OTHERS......

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Succ ... p_2019.png

[img]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/6d/Successful_requests_for_adminship_2019.png[/img]

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: RexxS for Adminship

Post by CrowsNest » Sat Jun 15, 2019 8:07 pm

To all those people who claimed RexxS would be a valuable addition to the Admin corps on the technical side of things.......
Hands up everybody who wasn't even aware that we had an"Anti-Harassment Tools Team" [raises hand]. ........ --RexxS (talk) 17:56, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
......were you all dropped on your heads as babies?

After his moronic comments about 2FA, and now this, there is little doubt the only thing RexxS can bring to the technical side, is ignorance fueled drama.

Still, stuck with him now, aren't you? If Queen Bishonen is willing to go to war with WMFOFFICE over the sysop rights of Floquenbeam, imagine what she'll do to any Bureaucrat who even breathed on little user for any reason.

And if you didn't know, Bishonen knows next to nothing about the technical side, but ignorance has never stopped her acting (she evidently didn't even bother to read the backstory to the Floquenbeam issue, but she also may have been lying about that to hide her true motives).

You really can pick 'em.

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: RexxS for Adminship

Post by CrowsNest » Sun Jun 30, 2019 12:07 pm

Net positive. :lol:

https://www.wikipediasucks.co/forum/vie ... 429#p10429

Come on, you fucks. Defend that. He's either lying about the reasons why he did not react to transphobia, or he specifically did not act, just to make some pathetic point. Either is disqualifying of an Administrator trusted to act for and on behalf of the community.

At what point are we actually going to see RexxS display the level of integrity his supporters claimed he posessed? Or is this what you pieces of shit really meant when you said that? I think it was, no?

As an Administrator, he is, and always was, the toxic spawn of his evil Queen. Sent to destroy anything that conflicts with her Royal wishes.

You had your chance to stop him gaining this role. Your failure, is Wikipedia's failure to demonstrate it is capable of self-government. At least in a way that doesn't resemble the Middle Ages.

You are now reaping the consequences of your actions.

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: RexxS for Adminship

Post by CrowsNest » Thu Jul 18, 2019 6:48 pm

This shit is just embarassing.....
Sahaja Yoga
I clicked "thanks" on your protection note really only because I am so pleased, still, that you're an admin. Take it easy, Drmies (talk) 14:27, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Nobody should be surprised that the guy who tells people to fuck off back to Facebook is pleased the guy who calls people prats is still a fellow Administrator. It means Drmies is less of an obvious turd in the punhcbowl. Two turds together.

Why would anyone be proud to have ReadS as an Administrator? For a start, he is still basically doing fuck all. With every passing month, it becomes clear he only ran for the prestige, not because he could do something for Wikipedia.

And what he does do, well, just look at his latest (and only 6th ever) block - a 31 hour block of Ukcasey for "Persistent addition of unsourced content".

The blocked user had made a grand total of five edits in just over an hour. RexxS blocked the user nearly eight hours after the user made they one edit that appeared to ignore their first and only warning. Although as can be seen, this can perhaps be explained by the fact that they were not adding unsourced content, to their untrained eye it has a source. The issue was independence of said source. The user had received one generic template warning from RexxS, which didn't explain the issue, and a contradictory warning from RexxS' good mate Doug Weller, which did refer to independence. The last edit only came three minutes before the edit for which RexxS blocked, no time for the user to have possibly absorbed the meaning of Doug's words, much less how they corrected RexxS miscommunication.

Unsurprisingly, the user has not returned. Unsurprisingly, the effect of the block was to make sure a user causing RexxS problems on an article he clearly feels strongly about (the one referred to above), did not return. A pattern in how (or why) he uses his tools, as rarely as he does it, is already emerging.

It's highly likely RexxS just assumed this user was a sock, they just couldn't be bothered to file the paperwork, so he manufactured a situation that to a casual observer would look like a clean kill. The exact sort of corrupt act Drmies does as a matter of routine. Hence his pleasure.

That theory aside, there was no communication other than through edit summaries and templates, to a user who on the face of it, was experiencing their first day of editing, not even reaching two hours, but was doing so in a way that displeased RexxS' view of what the content should say. So he stopped them, relying on the fact the community trusts him, and certainly isn't monitoring the probie.

Drmies would definitely be proud. Almost a carbon copy of the shit he pulls.

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: RexxS for Adminship

Post by CrowsNest » Tue Jul 23, 2019 12:28 am

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
As for the "unblockables", that trope went out of the window with the creation of Arbitration Enforcement and the consequent removal of second-mover advantage. You'll have to look elsewhere for a coathook to hang your condemnation of Floq on. --RexxS (talk) 22:52, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Um, no, no need to look elsewhere at all actually. It was you, you dumb prick, who argued in your own RfA that ArbCom don't have jurisdiction over the rules that govern how AE operates, for rather obvious reasons. So you can take this horseshit and shove it where the Sun doesn't shine.

And don't pretend like we haven't all seen the bullshit that's been pulled over the years at AE by Bishonen loyalist shitheel Admins like you, all aimed at diluting and ultimately negative the purpose of AE, as a quick venue for an unimpeachable enforcement decision to be arrived at.

It is precisely because AE removed the ability of corrupt fucks like you to deploy your 'wait, I disagree, I have unblocked, [insert bullshit reasons here]' advantage, that you came up with ingenious new means to ensure unlockables stayed unblocked even after a trip to AE. The first to dismiss as non-actionable first mover advantage, for example. Close second is the consensus requirement in controversial cases, rather a nonsense in context. Third is just the whole lawyer fuckery of it all, which now ensures nobody even really bothers with the board at all, not even for them most obvious of violations. The Rambling Man being the most obvious beneficiary.

No, shitbrake, you're not going to get off that easily. No way in hell will you be allowed to casually slip comments like this in without people being reminded just who the fuck kind of Administrator you really are.

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: RexxS for Adminship

Post by CrowsNest » Fri Jul 26, 2019 11:56 pm

A classic example of why RexxS became an Administrator........

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... =908020239

Context.....

https://www.wikipediasucks.co/forum/vie ... 936#p10936

It simply isn't possible to intimidate users this blatantly, if you're not an Administrator.

Now he is one, his unofficial list of people who haven't done anything wrong except upset a fellow scumbag, can in future be blocked for something entirely unrelated, and there will be no talk page warnings or AN/I reports to tip off anyone from Internal Affairs that this was a revenge block.

The reference to going on the record is cute. What record? There is no tool or human being that would ever uncover this past history in such a future enquiry. Only three people will even remember it happened in a month's time - RexxS, Black Kite, and PackMecEng.

If RexxS ever blocks PackMecEng and he doesn't mention this incident, whether it is related or not, but especially if not, then you will know why he was inexplicably promoted to Administrator. This is how it is done by the old guard.

This horse's head in the bed type stuff, is a dick move that his mentors Bishonen and Drmies would be truly proud of.

For the record, how would a proper Administrator handle it? Well, if they thought it was as serious as RexxS is making out, he would either report it to AN/I, or lodge an official warning on the user's talk page. And if he doesn't think it rises to that level of seriousness, he would either do nothing, or offer some unofficial words of advice in the venue, without resorting to the uneeded commentary, and certainly without the not so veiled threats.

Needless to say, this is not the RexxS that was sold to people in his RfA, except perhaps the faux offence at the emotional trauma suffered by his friend Black Kite, who is of course widely known in Wikipedia for being a sensitive soul. But hey, it's not news that that was a bunch of horseshit, right?

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: RexxS for Adminship

Post by CrowsNest » Wed Sep 18, 2019 9:30 am

:roll:
I did a TinEye reverse image search and that shows the image doesn't seem to exist anywhere else on the internet – which implies it probably hasn't been published prior to the blog in 2015.
Talking about an image taken in 1929. And a portrait of a famous author no less.

That is the RexxS that I saw at RfA. A complete and total moron.

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: RexxS for Adminship

Post by CrowsNest » Fri Oct 11, 2019 9:29 pm

See the hidden forums for interesting news regarding the historical precedent set by this RfA. :geek:

Dumb fucks need not read, this isn't for you, lab rats. :twisted:

Post Reply