|Page 1 of 1|
|Author:||Graaf Statler [ Fri Apr 12, 2019 1:34 am ]|
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... lp_Assange?
Mister Assange is arrested in a European country. First at all, I myself think the medical condition of mister Assange should be the first concern of the authorities (And his cat. There was a conflict about a dirty litter box I have read.)
Second, what will happened now with mister Assange is in the hands of the English authorities and I have understand there are made good appointments with mister Assange his laywers. (Also about his cat I suppose)
He looked very happy when he was arrested, he was smiling and looked relieved to me, so let it to the authorities.
Europe is no China, we don't need here "help" from Wikipedia, Jimbo or WMF in Europe, we can handled it ourself.
I am glad for everyone this situation has ended, and I am sure there is taken very good care about mister Assange. (And his cat too, the English love pets.) His human right are in no way violated, that is Utter Fucking Bullshit.
|Author:||Graaf Statler [ Sat Apr 13, 2019 1:20 am ]|
|Post subject:||Re: Jimmytalk|
Seen the medical situation of mister Assange mister Assange need rest and good medical care what he now gets. (And the cat too)You are complete right, mister jimbo, it is not up to us or WMF to judge about him. And indeed has Amerca a very independent Federal judiciary. And Europe too. Nobody is above the law, and we are both lucky to live in country with a good and great Federal judiciary.
I am sure there is laken good care now of him and his cat what too, what is absolute necessary, and we must trust our governments and Wikipedia must go back to it's original goals. I will quote your own words:
*Remember, an encyclopedia is not a data dump.
*The word "sum" has a purpose in that statement... an encyclopedia is not "all human knowledge" it is the "sum" of all human knowledge. It is specifically delimited for very good reasons." (Jimbo Wales, 4 August 2008)
*You are right that it is not the goal of Wikipedia to include all human knowledge - the key phrase usually overlooked in this criticism is "the sum". It is the goal of Wikipedia to include the sum of all human knowledge
*I wouldn't say "gist" as that word tends connote something about vagueness. But Wikipedia literally can't contain all knowledge for a number of reasons. And an encyclopedia is not, for example, a text book. And our entry on "China" for example really shouldn't be 10,000 pages long. It should provide a summary of what is known, and refer people to other sources to dig deeper.
*Where to stop is of course a very interesting question subject to thoughtful discussion - and of course Wikipedia can be (and is) much more comprehensive than traditional encyclopedias.
And what wrote Romaine, Romaine=>Wikimedia everywhere on his user page? And what was for years the slogan of the Dutch Wikimedia chapter?
This is complete in contradiction of what you said the goals where. I noticed this in 2016 already. Funny the page is started by my digitale friend Kolonel Zieksnor by the way.
And that article13 is indeed not affecting Wikipedia, there is a exception, and no, wikipedia must not change a political organisation, that is wrong. Because our states are political strong enough to handle this matters. And Trump, well the man is telling incredible crap but till now I don't see much blunders of the American government. Special the approach with North Korea I like very much.
Because it is a very wise approach. Give Kim all the credits, and invite him on the long run in The White House and take him to a basketball game and the problem is solved! The guy went in Switzerland to school and his sister too, just give him some western civilisation and you have a friend for ever. No stare downs, nothing,
Give them all a brand new Mercedes, and they are so afraid there will be a scratch on it, they immediately stop there nonsense.
|Page 1 of 1||All times are UTC - 8 hours|
|Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group