Wikipedia Sucks!

Kumioko wrote:

CMAwatch wrote:Noticed:

Multiple items in Aron Manning's block log by multiple administrators contain the same phrase:

“Clearly WP:NOTHERE, and now sending out rants via email, so let's stop that time wasting.”

That's shady. Is it possible that the same person is behind all these accounts? Unlikely, but how come they use the exact same phrases?

NOTHERE is just a generic catch phrase they use and they even use it to lie. I did over a million edits as I mentioned before, round 400, 000 to ENWP as well as lot of other things like working in Quarry, Pharbiractor, creating the Wikipedia discord server, etc. and NOTHERE was the term they used to get me banned. Then once I was banned they used Ban evasion to justify keeping me banned and as an excuse to vandalize my content.

There is nothing honest about the way the WMF works or how the Wikipedia culture functions.

They should embrace your work!

If they don't, they act against their own ethics.

Archive: http://archive.ph/dCQfH

Archive 2.

Screenshot attached.

Legal request? Wtf. Wp now deletes google search results too?
As a reminder: The web archive deleted archives of Fram_2 rfa revisions containing "accused of pedophilia"...

Anyway there's DuckDuckGo too: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22Tim+Hardcastle%22+%22Bbb23%22&ia=web
That reveals one more result:
https://encyclopediadramatica.rs/Wikipedia_Admin_Gallery

Bbb23, asshole patroller, made checkuser in 2015

and also: "Error creating thumbnail: File missing"
Let's fix that (source):


That identity is strongly suspected, but not confirmed: http://archive.is/KkjMb

CMAwatch wrote:

Kumioko wrote:

CMAwatch wrote:Noticed:

Multiple items in Aron Manning's block log by multiple administrators contain the same phrase:

“Clearly WP:NOTHERE, and now sending out rants via email, so let's stop that time wasting.”

That's shady. Is it possible that the same person is behind all these accounts? Unlikely, but how come they use the exact same phrases?

NOTHERE is just a generic catch phrase they use and they even use it to lie. I did over a million edits as I mentioned before, round 400, 000 to ENWP as well as lot of other things like working in Quarry, Pharbiractor, creating the Wikipedia discord server, etc. and NOTHERE was the term they used to get me banned. Then once I was banned they used Ban evasion to justify keeping me banned and as an excuse to vandalize my content.

There is nothing honest about the way the WMF works or how the Wikipedia culture functions.

They should embrace your work!

If they don't, they act against their own ethics.

Thanks and I agree. Unfortunately they would rather have people like Bbb23.

heh

Hopefully Mr. Hardcastle is squirming in his dark basement room. Whether he is Bbb23 or not, he's clearly a grade AAA bastard.....

CMAwatch wrote:http://archive.ph/Yrd4u

The page in the search results:
http://archive.ph/n4ytQ https://web.archive.org/web/20191104044739/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Knowsclaps/sandbox
Let's see how long it takes to delete.

Mod note: moved the Fram - Guido parts to Fram Gate, the webarchive unreliability to "The Internet Archive is Making Wikipedia More Reliable".

Archive: http://archive.ph/xBe17

Screenshot attached.

Bbb23's tactic is to deliberately provoke users, and then blame them for being slightly uncivil (e.g. “I demand an answer”).

Systematic abuse.

At least, Johnvr4 eventually got unblocked.

But why a very productive editor like Handroid7 is treated like trash on Wikipedia is beyond me.

Handroid7 made Wikipedia better, and served the purpose of Wikipedia, while Bbb23 did the opposite.

That ban evasion policy is anti-innovative.

What is the point of keeping someone banned who has never repeated his mistake?

Also, a few anti-circumcision edits do not justify a permanent ban.

WP:NOTHERE is also clearly wrong, regarding what Handroid7 created:

* Draft:List of features removed from Android - Wikipedia
* Mobile phone camera comparison

There were many more, but those have not been archived, sadly.

Is that incredible work by Handroid7 considered NOTHERE on Wikipedia?

Every administrator that considers Handroid7's great work as NOTHERE is anti-innovative.

Readers of Wikipedia care about contents, not about whether the writer of that content has evaded a ban in the past.

Logically speaking, his ban evasion was not any different than any other account creation.

Imagine Handroid7 had created the article on Bill Gates, and his ban evasion was discovered some day in future.
Should Bbb23 delete the Bill Gates article? Sounds absurd?

Bbb23 erased every article created by Handroid7, and then silenced his talk page despite Handroid7 communicated in a very civil way.

Shame on Bbb23 for treating peaceful, civil and productive users like a pile of garbage.