What is a good personal attack?
Posted: Thu May 09, 2019 9:34 am
I write a guide for our Wikipediocrazy friends.
A good personal attack one is one what hurts. There must always contain at least a part of the true and it must, can contain real humor. No shooting blanks over someones head. Not the humor what only make your friends laughing, because you don't need to confess them you are the best. Let me help you.
First of all, never, never start to defend yourself against a personal attack, never get angry, just do one step aside and attack the person in a good way back later. Never, never start with personal attacks yourself, wait till the other starts, very important. Wait till he gets angry, doesn't have any argument and wait till he start with your mam is fat arguments.
A good personal attack must have elements what are true. If I attack Timmy I attack him on his self promotion, because that is his weak point. Because Timmy use Wikipedia to establish his name, just like Doc James does, NewYorkBrad, Katherine Maher, James Alexander, lawyer Gerlach, the famous composer Oscar van Dillen, ICT lawyer Arnoud Engelfriet, etc, etc. Because who had ever heard of them without Wikipedia? Being a important wikipedian is the best way to promote yourself if you are not even in the subtop IRL. That is the first thing to do. Second: I think he has absolute a form of Asperger but not any evidence so I ad this to the fist attack because he attacked me with a complete empty attack, you are stupide. So I have putted him down as a autistic self promoter for the world.
Vigilant is a other case. It is clear the guy has something to do with that blunder SanFanBans and he definitely need something to score something to justify his blunders. Special now I have booted all his wiki agents out of my door. In my work on wikipedia he can't find not one bad edit and his friends also not so he needs something else, he needs to proof Statler is mad but he only has a confidential rapport I am 100% mental health. What he is obesely not.
What is his weak point? He is a guy who had without out wikipedia never, never reached anything in this world. Just like Alexander and many, many other wiki career makers. So I start to play with him and let him bringing up the most rediciles arguments and accusations. At the end he start even to accuse me of living in Holland and to be a pensioner with a hobby. Great! Because that is what I need to attack him.
And now it is my time to put him down as a fat, only pizza eating autistic idiot who only knows how a naked woman looks from his common porn who needs two chairs in a airplane with a wiki addiction. Doesn't matter what is true of it, and I am much more funny than he is. And because he has used the personal attack tool in a wrong way he has no change ever to change that picture. Because his fault is not his friends are the audience, but the readers of a forum. And his friends I making laughing at him too.
"He Vigilant, do you pay 50% extra for that second chair in a airplane or 100%? And what pizza do you like the most? Pepperoni? So your ass burn the next day to give you at least any sexual sensation in your life?"
Look, that is a good personal attack. All elements I pointed out are in it, and all his friends laugh too.
I hope this small class was useful for both of you Tim an Vig. And remember the key point, never be the one who starts with personal attics. And have patient to beat back.
A good personal attack one is one what hurts. There must always contain at least a part of the true and it must, can contain real humor. No shooting blanks over someones head. Not the humor what only make your friends laughing, because you don't need to confess them you are the best. Let me help you.
First of all, never, never start to defend yourself against a personal attack, never get angry, just do one step aside and attack the person in a good way back later. Never, never start with personal attacks yourself, wait till the other starts, very important. Wait till he gets angry, doesn't have any argument and wait till he start with your mam is fat arguments.
A good personal attack must have elements what are true. If I attack Timmy I attack him on his self promotion, because that is his weak point. Because Timmy use Wikipedia to establish his name, just like Doc James does, NewYorkBrad, Katherine Maher, James Alexander, lawyer Gerlach, the famous composer Oscar van Dillen, ICT lawyer Arnoud Engelfriet, etc, etc. Because who had ever heard of them without Wikipedia? Being a important wikipedian is the best way to promote yourself if you are not even in the subtop IRL. That is the first thing to do. Second: I think he has absolute a form of Asperger but not any evidence so I ad this to the fist attack because he attacked me with a complete empty attack, you are stupide. So I have putted him down as a autistic self promoter for the world.
Vigilant is a other case. It is clear the guy has something to do with that blunder SanFanBans and he definitely need something to score something to justify his blunders. Special now I have booted all his wiki agents out of my door. In my work on wikipedia he can't find not one bad edit and his friends also not so he needs something else, he needs to proof Statler is mad but he only has a confidential rapport I am 100% mental health. What he is obesely not.
What is his weak point? He is a guy who had without out wikipedia never, never reached anything in this world. Just like Alexander and many, many other wiki career makers. So I start to play with him and let him bringing up the most rediciles arguments and accusations. At the end he start even to accuse me of living in Holland and to be a pensioner with a hobby. Great! Because that is what I need to attack him.
And now it is my time to put him down as a fat, only pizza eating autistic idiot who only knows how a naked woman looks from his common porn who needs two chairs in a airplane with a wiki addiction. Doesn't matter what is true of it, and I am much more funny than he is. And because he has used the personal attack tool in a wrong way he has no change ever to change that picture. Because his fault is not his friends are the audience, but the readers of a forum. And his friends I making laughing at him too.
"He Vigilant, do you pay 50% extra for that second chair in a airplane or 100%? And what pizza do you like the most? Pepperoni? So your ass burn the next day to give you at least any sexual sensation in your life?"
Look, that is a good personal attack. All elements I pointed out are in it, and all his friends laugh too.
I hope this small class was useful for both of you Tim an Vig. And remember the key point, never be the one who starts with personal attics. And have patient to beat back.