Toxic Wikipedians

Editors, Admins and Bureaucrats blecch!
User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Toxic Wikipedians

Post by CrowsNest » Wed Sep 18, 2019 9:32 am

Hilarious when these attempts to build alliances between the toxics, doesn't quite go as planned.....

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... u're_a_dog!

Expecting normal behaviour from psychos? Stupid.

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Toxic Wikipedians

Post by CrowsNest » Wed Sep 18, 2019 7:12 pm

:?
A crucial thing to know about survival at today's en-wiki is that the community will not protect you against hostile insult. You either become tough, or you retire, or you get crushed emotionally, and I mean permanent damage. I continuously re-evaluate whether I'm tough enough to avoid retirement for another day, but I will not be crushed. And I will work hard not to respond to hostile insult in kind, per two wrongs don't make a right. ―Mandruss 05:27, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Encyclopedia, or fighting pit?

User avatar
JuiceBeetle
Sucks Warrior
Posts: 681
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2019 8:27 pm
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 45 times

Re: Toxic Wikipedians

Post by JuiceBeetle » Wed Sep 18, 2019 8:03 pm

CrowsNest wrote:Encyclopedia, or fighting pit?

Directed question, but the devil is in the details:
A fighting pit, where the hero fighters' reward is the illusion that they create "encyclopedic" content. Imagine an mma fighter, to fully experience the burlesque.
Mandruss, I respect your honesty and insight, in response to Jehochman's two-faced "I want to help".

Post Reply