Johnuniq for Admin
Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2019 2:04 pm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... p/Johnuniq
I'm loving how Admin candidates are now wearing their foundation hatred with pride. Doesn't particularly need the tools, comes off as a bit of a partisan to a few editors in other non-Foundation related disputes, but hey, if they're handing out cookies, you don't say no, right?
It says a lot that the outspoken people of Wikipedia (whether they be right or wrong) evidently see no value or indeed honour in being a mere editor. It is obviously attractive to such people, in addition to the status/prestige, that safety net of the Super Mario problem, in addition to the whole Vested Contributor problem.
More support than an equally old hand like Floquenbeam, so, y'know, he must be doing something right, to be seen as outspoken while also being seen as trustworthy and level-headed. If Floquenbeam weren't so up himself, maybe he could take a few pointers from his impending Class of '19 compatriot.
Nothing stands out in my mind, except he is rather an ever-present in any drama, be he right or wrong, but that's probably a bad thing - the really good candidates and Administrators, the ones who can genuinely lay claim to meeting the higher standard of WP:ADMIN, they're the ones I do remember, because it's just so goddamned rare.
Whose talk pages he most regularly turns up on, is a concern, since I doubt in his 81 visits to Bishonen and 40 to Drmies, it has ever been to say boo to those particular gooses. But if he has, then sure, Wikipedia needs a load more Administrators prepared to stand up to the real bullies. If not, well, they sure as shit don't need any more apologists.
I'm loving how Admin candidates are now wearing their foundation hatred with pride. Doesn't particularly need the tools, comes off as a bit of a partisan to a few editors in other non-Foundation related disputes, but hey, if they're handing out cookies, you don't say no, right?
It says a lot that the outspoken people of Wikipedia (whether they be right or wrong) evidently see no value or indeed honour in being a mere editor. It is obviously attractive to such people, in addition to the status/prestige, that safety net of the Super Mario problem, in addition to the whole Vested Contributor problem.
More support than an equally old hand like Floquenbeam, so, y'know, he must be doing something right, to be seen as outspoken while also being seen as trustworthy and level-headed. If Floquenbeam weren't so up himself, maybe he could take a few pointers from his impending Class of '19 compatriot.
Nothing stands out in my mind, except he is rather an ever-present in any drama, be he right or wrong, but that's probably a bad thing - the really good candidates and Administrators, the ones who can genuinely lay claim to meeting the higher standard of WP:ADMIN, they're the ones I do remember, because it's just so goddamned rare.
Whose talk pages he most regularly turns up on, is a concern, since I doubt in his 81 visits to Bishonen and 40 to Drmies, it has ever been to say boo to those particular gooses. But if he has, then sure, Wikipedia needs a load more Administrators prepared to stand up to the real bullies. If not, well, they sure as shit don't need any more apologists.