"Fram Gate" in Arbcom

[Graaf Statler]

Not a chance in hell that I would ever put my case before ArbCom or the community, and I'm sure others feel the same.

O please, never Guido. No one will even take the trouble to have a close look at your case like I did. They will crash you! No one will defend you. They will roast you for the second time.

[Guido den Broeder]

Do you mean Web.Archive.org? They have removed that information on demand?

Yes. There were 2 snapshots of Fram_2 rfa before the word "pedophile" was redacted and revdeled through 63 revisions.

These snapshots disappeared after the revisions were deleted by Primefac, the archive was shared on WPO:
http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=10758&hilit=fram+rfa&start=250#p252112
There are many ties between the Web Archive and WMF (level: digitization of full libraries).

And it's back now? With 2 more snapshots; the last one is the redacted.
https://web.archive.org/web/20190927132825/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Fram_2
I wish I had a screenshot. Anyway the point is to use at least archive.today, and optionally web.archive for wikipedia matters.

DYK: archive.today can save a snapshot from the web.archive. I've made a copy now: http://archive.ph/8pUtU

The same insinuation by Fram about me is still on-wiki in Opinia's talk-page archives. Nobody cared about it then.

[JuiceBeetle]

The same insinuation by Fram about me is still on-wiki in Opinia's talk-page archives. Nobody cared about it then.

For reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Opabinia_regalis/Archive_15#Why
Which in turn refers to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Opabinia_regalis/Archive_15#Guido_den_Broeder

Apparently, the censorship only serves to protect Fram's image, not the one he defamed.

[Guido den Broeder]

The same insinuation by Fram about me is still on-wiki in Opinia's talk-page archives. Nobody cared about it then.

For reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Opabinia_regalis/Archive_15#Why
Which in turn refers to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Opabinia_regalis/Archive_15#Guido_den_Broeder

Apparently, the censorship only serves to protect Fram's image, not the one he defamed.

That was the second time. Also interesting because Opabinia joins in the insults and nobody cares about that either. In reality, my 'unhelpful edits' somehow emerged as consensus and managed to survive. So did most of the 'iceberg' that is apparently hidden under my 'CFS edits', claims that continue to be made but always unsupported by diffs. Pretty much how Bbb23 operates as well.