Wikipedia Sucks!

Site ban proposal: SashiRolls

Step 1. TonyBalloni heavily slants his report against Sashi, possibly to the point of misrepresenting the diffs.

Step 2. More people respond to the rhetoric of the report than to the evidence.

Step 3. MastCell counts the votes and declares it consensus. Mission accomplished.

One notable response:

Comment This is the second time in less than a month that TonyBallioni has proposed sitebanning an editor based on out-of-context, cherrypicked, and/or misconstrued evidence (see here for the other one). Perhaps a restriction preventing him from proposing site bans is in order. Let's say for the next 12 months. There is no shortage of other admins and established editors who can propose site bans for truly banworthy editors. −−− Cactus Jack 07:11, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Hell, I'm amazed Sashi lasted this long.....some of those pricks have "had it in for him" for years. He DARED to take shots at Sagecandor, aka Cirt. Is anyone really surprised to see professional bastards like Drmies, MONGO, Beyond My Ken and Doug Weller (many having never dealt with Sashi) bouncing out of the woodwork to condemn him? Standard procedure, to build up "consensus". No doubt off-wp canvassing was performed. They are hypocrites and Cirt is still a "blessed editor".....despite being desysopped and banned under the ugliest circumstances in WP history.

Maybe that should be "official policy": Go after a Cirt sockpuppet at your own peril.

TonyBallioni's recent - failed - attempt at getting an editor banned:
Proposed site ban of Rich Farmbrough

The crusade is just getting started.