Page 1 of 1
Fae indeffed on EnWP
Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2020 7:57 pm
by Kumioko
It seems chronic sexual deviant Fae has also been indeffed on the English Wikipedia for an obvious and blatant violation of his Arbcom sanction. So that makes at least 2, longterm, high output editors pushed out in the last month or so.
Re: Fae indeffed on EnWP
Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2020 8:46 pm
by ericbarbour
Lol, what again?
I figured he'd have given up, especially after the immense shit-explosion Ashley created between 2011 and 2013,
as a trustee of Wikimedia UK who was also banned from Wikipedia....have a few reminders, some of which require digging around:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... ip/F%C3%A6
https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/WMUK_Boar ... on_results
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... se/F%C3%A6
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... ial_report
https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/Minutes_2 ... 6#2_August
https://blog.wikimedia.org.uk/2013/07/a ... -uk-board/
Now, is THAT "dysfunctional" enough??
(And just btw, Fae's contrib list was grossly inflated because he used bots written by others to grind unimportant things.....he is not a "leader" or even a "content maker", he is just a political manipulator.)
Re: Fae indeffed on EnWP
Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2020 11:19 pm
by ericbarbour
In case you didn't see it, let me post one of Andreas's old comments from that last Signpost item. Ashley was pushing (relentlessly) to set up the "Wikimedia Chapters Association" as a nonprofit. With himself as the leader. With an annual salary.
I profoundly resent the attempted establishment of this administrative gravy train. €180,000 for a "secretary general", while countless programming jobs remain undone, and Bugzilla requests go unanswered? If the Foundation has money to burn, pay some extra programmers and web interface designers rather than throwing cash out the window. Unbelievable. JN466 18:44, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Every objection raised was shrugged off by Mike Peel. Wikimedia UK is truly a Weasel Society.
And this is what happened to the WCA:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimed ... ssociation
Shhhhh! it's "sleeping"!
Re: Fae indeffed on EnWP
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2020 2:09 am
by ericbarbour
Might as well list the Wikipediocracy thread, even it if is full of Vigina spluttering.
http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtop ... 38&t=11693
Even funnier: Scott "Scottywong" Wieser, one of Wikipedia's worst administrators of all time, is now on Wikipediocracy shrieking at all and sundry for "outing" his miserable little ass. Hol' on, was that not done several years ago?? Oh, that's right, the book wiki has a long article about Scott, which I authored. In 2013.
Wikipediocracy isn't a "criticism forum" anymore--not if they allow Wieser to post petty bitchery.
- ScottWieser.jpg (10.9 KiB) Viewed 6247 times
Re: Fae indeffed on EnWP
Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2020 12:14 am
by boredbird
Re: Fae indeffed on EnWP
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2020 11:15 pm
by JuiceBeetle
ericbarbour wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 11:19 pm
Wikimedia UK is truly a Weasel Society.
Seconded.
Re: Fae indeffed on EnWP
Posted: Sat Dec 12, 2020 8:32 pm
by ericbarbour
Pronouns my ass, NONE of them could stop jabbering AT GREAT LENGTH about the moronic petty details of the moronic impenetrable bureaucracy they have built around their miserable little fat burrito-gobbling faces. The whole damn thing should be torn to shreds and restarted--preferably with fewer complete asshole cranks. And no Fae.
Re: Fae indeffed on EnWP
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2020 10:11 pm
by ericbarbour
ericbarbour wrote: ↑Mon Dec 07, 2020 2:09 am
ScottWieser.jpg
lol, private comment from a reader about Wieser. Ouchie.
If Dothrakis had gay prostitutes that's what they'd look like.