A) thank you for posting these. Unfortunately one has already been rev-deleted, indicating that the LITTLE WIKI BASTARDS ARE WATCHING THIS THREAD. The others will probably disappear soon. You seem to have gotten thru to them.Jennsaurus wrote: ↑Sat Aug 27, 2022 3:48 pmhttps://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... 1015444104
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... 1015445421
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... 1015446049
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... 1015446318
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... 1015446318
B) NONE of this surprises me. They go into a screaming RAGE when someone doxes THEM, but it's "acceptable" for THEM to track down and harass someone they dislike. Anyone. Since OberRanks was working at the National Archive, I expect that Boing was calling the management to "punish" him. Backstabbing petty little worms. This is Your Glorious Project in action. Be disgusted.
It has happened so many times, I could not keep track.....Newyorkbrad went on a tirade in 2012 to "justify" the banning of Phil Hall/Horse With No Name and his many socks. Allegedly Phil was calling people at work to argue with them, or something. But the admins did a great job of covering up all the details. There is little trace of what Phil actually did. And this is ALSO why Ira feels it's "fully justified" to delete good content written by those awful banned users. Especially the ones who "dox" the "good Wikipedians".that last link is Diannaa saying another editor was threatened in 2012, well after the Poetlister drama:
*:::::There was an editor back in 2012 who got indef-blocked for off-wiki harassment for calling someone's employer so I am pretty sure doing that is a pretty bad idea.— [[User:Diannaa|Diannaa]] ([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 15:34, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Does anyone know what theyre referring to there?
As I keep saying: Wikipedia is an insane cult-oriented social gaming site. The "encyclopedia" is of far less importance than the socializing, power-tripping and abuse.