Hilarious.If you work for The Daily Mail or an associated publication, I will STILL be happy to be interviewed. Publicly. On my Wikipedia talk page. Let's see how brave you are in a venue where the sun is shining.
For a start, don't call yourself brave when everyone knows you faked a heart attack just to prevent the humiliation of a an already unwise Request for Adminship taking a long slow glide into the sea. All because he couldn't manage to not be Guy Macon, Wikipedia wanker, for a measly seven days.
You get a good idea of the man, when you realise he genuinely did claim after the event, once he "got back from hospital", that a large part of the opposition was from people who can't stand it that he doesn't like the Mail. Lolwut? This is the same website where finding someone to speak up in defence of the Mail is actually harder than finding someone who will say they support Trump.
Anyway, based on his long standing character, and indeed his performance in only the last few days, I think we can all agree how that interview would go.....
Oh hi Guy, it's Mr Journalist from the Daily Mail. I am here at the time you requested, and I am ready to interview you any time you are ready.
Ok, nice to meet you. Fire away.
Well, my first question is, why do you keep claiming the Mail fabricates quotes from judges? And that the whole Wikipedia community knows this because you "caught" us doing it. Other than the Amanda Knox example, which as you know, was taken down after only two minutes, have you got any other examples? You surely know that in the London courts, this is likely to be a very costly defamation suit if you are making a statement you know to be false and with the clear intent of harming the economic interests of my employer, and indeed myself (you may recognise my byeline from numerous court reports)?
GET OFF MY TALK PAGE!
Oh, OK. Well, that was a short interview. If I could just have the agreed upon copy of what was said, I'll be on my way. As you requested, I wasn't making my own
notes because you had previously said you thought I would fabricate your words, or indeed, manufacture this entire interview.
OH HELLZ TO THE NO, U FOOL
When is this fuckstick ever going to learn?
EVERYTHING YOU HAVE EVER SAID ON WIKIPEDIA CAN BE USED AGAINST YOU.
You still have the option of requesting revision deletion of every defamatory statement you have ever made about the British media on Wikipedia's lawn. If you start now, you might be finished by the time the trial starts.