so what can I do now?
Just keep sending appeals to random Wikipedia Administrators.
Never forget, there are no firm rules on Wikipedia. None of the volunteers have the ability or the authority to tell you to go away and not return for at least a year.
"Ignore all rules" is a core Wikipedia policy for a reason.
If their inflexible, rude, arrogant and frankly insulting handling of your case has prevented you from obtaining a genuine chance of becoming a productive Wikipedia editor, then you are entitled to ignore them, and just keep going.
Keep appealing, keep stating your case. Make sure that they know that you're only going to actually go away once they have given you your chance to prove you can be productive, and you have failed that chance.
Reject their artificial and unjust conditions, because, and it's no secret to us, much of what these people do when declining appeals, isn't done for your best interests or for Wikipedia's.
It's done to make their lives easier. It's hard work to mentor people, which is why they don't want to do it.
ArbCom are very busy people. They routinely ignore issues, or give pro forma replies, when they don't want to take the time to give a proper response.
The person who has taken over your case, Beeblebrox, doesn't have time to deal with people like you. He is too busy talking to the assholes and weirdos on Wikipediocracy. He is probably over there right now, laughing about you. So why would you care what he says about your case?
Never forget, your are entitled to edit Wikipedia.
The owners of Wikipedia are going around telling anyone and everyone, that Wikipedia is a vital public service, and that by extension, they're not simply a private website that can pick and choose who they let take part. They market Wikipedia as a Universal Human Right.
It is your HUMAN RIGHT to be able to edit, according to the owners of Wikipedia. The volunteers disagree, but who are they to tell you a different story to what the owners of Wikipedia are telling you? If the volunteers had their chance to decide such things, everyone would have to work really really hard, just for the chance to lick their boots. They're power mad. They get off on it.
If the owners of Wikipedia don't think you should edit Wikipedia, they have the means to prevent you, without involving a single volunteer. And if that happens, you will know it has happened.
It hasn't happened yet.
So keep going. Appeal, appeal, appeal.
If they claim you are harassing them with these unwanted messages, ignore it. The owners of Wikipedia are the only people with the power and authority to decide whether you are harassing volunteers.
Harassment is more than simply messaging people who don't want to be messaged. Harassment definitely isn't sending a person a first message. If the owners of Wikipedia believe you should no longer be allowed to contact volunteers, then you will know it. This hasn't happened yet.
So keep going.
Exercise your right to edit. Because it is a "fundamental human right" according to the owners of Wikipedia. Anyone who tells you different, is a liar.
If they do, show them this......
https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/20 ... hat-means/
Anyone who stops you from exercising your right to freedom of expression on Wikipedia, up to and including the arrogant and uncaring Arbitration Committee, without first having proven that the way you express yourself on Wikipedia is contrary to Wikipedia's other goals, is denying you a fundamental human right.
You are entitled to your chance.
History teaches us that human rights are not given away by oppressive regimes, they have to be fought for.
So fight.