An anomaly among Wikipedians? The strange Ombudsman...
Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2021 3:57 am
Here is the page of the user:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ombudsman
The user has a far-reaching knowledge, seems to be prolific, has an amazing writing style and is well-engaged with the topics he/she researches.
However, Ombudsman holds a handful of controversial standpoints, chiefly in medical issues, and there has been a long-standing quarell betwixt him and the Wackopedia-nibbling voodoo damsels.
Many of you, sure, would disagree strongly with many of his views, but, anyhow, I would highly esteem a background of yours concerning how useful and sound Ombudsman actions in the “stupid videogame” (quethes E. Barbour) could be to our critical cause against the Jimboland’s ghoulish gulags and its dilettantes, not to mention an overall evaluation of this user.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ombudsman
The user has a far-reaching knowledge, seems to be prolific, has an amazing writing style and is well-engaged with the topics he/she researches.
However, Ombudsman holds a handful of controversial standpoints, chiefly in medical issues, and there has been a long-standing quarell betwixt him and the Wackopedia-nibbling voodoo damsels.
Many of you, sure, would disagree strongly with many of his views, but, anyhow, I would highly esteem a background of yours concerning how useful and sound Ombudsman actions in the “stupid videogame” (quethes E. Barbour) could be to our critical cause against the Jimboland’s ghoulish gulags and its dilettantes, not to mention an overall evaluation of this user.