Tamzin RfA

Editors, Admins and Bureaucrats blecch!
User avatar
badmachine
Sucker
Posts: 449
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:55 am
Has thanked: 530 times
Been thanked: 255 times
Contact:

Re: Tamzin RfA

Post by badmachine » Wed May 11, 2022 6:55 pm

boredbird wrote:
Wed May 11, 2022 2:17 am
Here is more about some of Tamzin's various personalities. Turns out some are male, some are female and some are plural.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... s_personae

They each have individual names, isn't that special?

He forgot to list the one he mentioned earlier which likes to warn people and block them. That one has been on a roll.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... ser=Tamzin
oh good grief:
I called my platonic soulmate,<ref>"Best friend" is far too weak a term, but all applicable stronger terms would make sense to only the two of us.</ref> [[User:BiomatrixBackup|BiomatrixBackup]], and vented for a few hours.
a quick trek over to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:BiomatrixBackup reveals
This user may sometimes share an IP address with Tamzin.
this user's first contribution was to complain of tripping an edit filter on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mariano_Rivera

their contributions to english wikipedia don't include Mariano Rivera:
07:42, 14 June 2021 diff hist +38‎ User:BiomatrixBackup ‎ Added the fact that I sometimes share an IP address with another editor. Tag: Visual edit
07:22, 14 June 2021 diff hist +20‎ m Phthonus ‎ Added the citation for a true but uncited claim. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
23 January 2019
07:25, 23 January 2019 diff hist +15‎ User:BiomatrixBackup ‎No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
07:21, 23 January 2019 diff hist +77‎ N User:BiomatrixBackup ‎ ←Created page with 'This creature gains "Destroyed: Put this creature into its owner's archives."' Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
01:37, 23 January 2019 diff hist +841‎ Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Reports ‎
there was a flurry of activity on that article on January 22, 23, and 24, 2019. i wonder if any of those users are their* socks.
This used to be called "demonic possession". Has he tried an exorcist? Maybe they can be cast into a herd of pigs or something.
this looks to me like a narcissist. probably a rich narcissist going by where they apparently live. that whole thing about their* systems as if anyone cares just looks like simple vanity. it appears wikipedia may further enable their conditions by publishing a "debrief" of their* RfA. the entirety of their 'systems' screed seems to be included within. :jerkoff:

PS: i saw Vigilant's post about Tamzin this morning at WPO, apparently deleted. imo he is welcome to post here. :^)


(edited to add the PS)

User avatar
boredbird
Sucks Mod
Posts: 500
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2017 3:24 am
Has thanked: 635 times
Been thanked: 286 times

Re: Tamzin RfA

Post by boredbird » Wed May 11, 2022 9:55 pm

badmachine wrote:
Wed May 11, 2022 6:55 pm
PS: i saw Vigilant's post about Tamzin this morning at WPO, apparently deleted. imo he is welcome to post here. :^)
You need permissions to see it.

https://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewto ... =8&t=12595

User avatar
badmachine
Sucker
Posts: 449
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:55 am
Has thanked: 530 times
Been thanked: 255 times
Contact:

Re: Tamzin RfA

Post by badmachine » Wed May 11, 2022 9:58 pm

boredbird wrote:
Wed May 11, 2022 9:55 pm
badmachine wrote:
Wed May 11, 2022 6:55 pm
PS: i saw Vigilant's post about Tamzin this morning at WPO, apparently deleted. imo he is welcome to post here. :^)
You need permissions to see it.

https://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewto ... =8&t=12595
well dang
You are not authorised to read this forum.

User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 4547
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Location: The ass-tral plane
Has thanked: 1099 times
Been thanked: 1797 times

Re: Tamzin RfA

Post by ericbarbour » Thu May 12, 2022 4:40 am

I wonder how many times the Vag can pull this before they toss him.

Also, the WPO thread about the RFA was locked after Tamzin responded to me with "lol". No answers there.

User avatar
Kumioko
Sucks Mod
Posts: 860
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2017 11:54 pm
Has thanked: 43 times
Been thanked: 177 times

Re: Tamzin RfA

Post by Kumioko » Thu May 12, 2022 9:23 pm

Yeah vagina-lint has posted a bunch of sketchy stuff in the past that should have gotten him tossed.

As for locking the thread, thats a by product of Zoloft being an asskisser towards the wikipedia admins and not wanting to hurt their little feelings!
#BbbGate

User avatar
boredbird
Sucks Mod
Posts: 500
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2017 3:24 am
Has thanked: 635 times
Been thanked: 286 times

Re: Tamzin RfA

Post by boredbird » Fri May 13, 2022 2:51 pm

Kumioko wrote:
Thu May 12, 2022 9:23 pm
As for locking the thread, thats a by product of Zoloft being an asskisser towards the wikipedia admins and not wanting to hurt their little feelings!
I was thinking more like their widoo feewings.

Which might be hurt if we don't vote for them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... 1085337524

User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 4547
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Location: The ass-tral plane
Has thanked: 1099 times
Been thanked: 1797 times

Re: Tamzin RfA

Post by ericbarbour » Fri Jun 24, 2022 5:15 am

Long article in Slate about the Tamzin RFA

https://slate.com/technology/2022/06/wi ... amzin.html

which led to a typically pissy (NEW) Wikipediocracy thread....

http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtop ... =6&t=12645

and this shit from Billy Burns:
*grumble grumble* few links in the article outside of Wikipedia. No links to us.
FUCK YOU, BILL. FUCK YOU, BILL.
IT'S NOT ABOUT YOU AND YOUR DAMN FORUM, BILL.

User avatar
boredbird
Sucks Mod
Posts: 500
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2017 3:24 am
Has thanked: 635 times
Been thanked: 286 times

Re: Tamzin RfA

Post by boredbird » Fri Jun 24, 2022 5:51 am

ericbarbour wrote:
Fri Jun 24, 2022 5:15 am
Long article in Slate about the Tamzin RFA

https://slate.com/technology/2022/06/wi ... amzin.html

and this shit from Billy Burns:
*grumble grumble* few links in the article outside of Wikipedia. No links to us.
FUCK YOU, BILL. FUCK YOU, BILL.
IT'S NOT ABOUT YOU AND YOUR DAMN FORUM, BILL.
Why would Harrison have linked to a site which censored anything that wasn't already being discussed on Wikipedia? If it's just a second Wikipedia what's the point? The RfA was already long enough without adding another one. He should have linked to Sucks but it's the same lameass rules everywhere now I guess.

Pay no attention to the creepy multiple personalities behind the curtain. Except they're not even trying to hide are they?

Psychosis has a very unfair reputation!

User avatar
wexter
Sucks Warrior
Posts: 574
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2020 4:18 pm
Has thanked: 274 times
Been thanked: 279 times

Re: Tamzin RfA

Post by wexter » Sat Jun 25, 2022 1:36 am

WMF: So how many serious mental disorders do you have?
TNT: Just delusional psychosis, suicidalism and GID.
WMF: Great, welcome aboard. You will be the sanest person on our team.
+depression to the list

"Tamzin is the personification of an "administrator with malfunctioning tools"

OK another mentally ill lunatic in the lunatic asylum.. being judged by other lunatics in the asylum.

"No matter where you go there you are" - mentally ill folks never figure this out.


Wikipedia provides purpose and validation to the wack-job brigade.

Behind the curtain of Wikipedia lurks a handful (perhaps no more than 100) of mentally ill or autistic editors/administrators.
Wikipedia - "Barely competent and paranoid. There’s a hell of a combination."

User avatar
Kumioko
Sucks Mod
Posts: 860
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2017 11:54 pm
Has thanked: 43 times
Been thanked: 177 times

Re: Tamzin RfA

Post by Kumioko » Sat Jun 25, 2022 12:05 pm

boredbird wrote:
Fri Jun 24, 2022 5:51 am
ericbarbour wrote:
Fri Jun 24, 2022 5:15 am
Long article in Slate about the Tamzin RFA

https://slate.com/technology/2022/06/wi ... amzin.html

and this shit from Billy Burns:
*grumble grumble* few links in the article outside of Wikipedia. No links to us.
FUCK YOU, BILL. FUCK YOU, BILL.
IT'S NOT ABOUT YOU AND YOUR DAMN FORUM, BILL.
Why would Harrison have linked to a site which censored anything that wasn't already being discussed on Wikipedia? If it's just a second Wikipedia what's the point? The RfA was already long enough without adding another one. He should have linked to Sucks but it's the same lameass rules everywhere now I guess.

Pay no attention to the creepy multiple personalities behind the curtain. Except they're not even trying to hide are they?

Psychosis has a very unfair reputation!
I think its laughable that zoloft/stanistani believes they deserves a link in the article.

Having said that, with his long history of writing puff pieces about wikipedia, and WPOs admins and friends only allowed site policy, stephen could easily justify it.
#BbbGate

Post Reply