John Pack Lambert

Editors, Admins and Bureaucrats blecch!
User avatar
wexter
Sucks Warrior
Posts: 574
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2020 4:18 pm
Has thanked: 274 times
Been thanked: 281 times

Re: John Pack Lambert

Post by wexter » Mon Oct 10, 2022 1:22 am

Oppose -- John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:25, 8 October 2022 (UTC)


Opposing his own site banning is of course John Pack Lambert

A normal person would say "fuck this noise I am out of here!" or "Screw you guys, I'm going home,”

It just shows you how desperate the mentally ill and autistic are for the virtual validation of Wikipedia.
Wikipedia - "Barely competent and paranoid. There’s a hell of a combination."

User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 4601
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Location: The ass-tral plane
Has thanked: 1142 times
Been thanked: 1844 times

Re: John Pack Lambert

Post by ericbarbour » Mon Oct 10, 2022 3:08 am

wexter wrote:
Mon Oct 10, 2022 1:22 am
Oppose -- John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:25, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Opposing his own site banning is of course John Pack Lambert
The link to the AN brain-diarrhea display:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... _topic_ban

As far as I can tell.......he's well known to be a Mormon. Since 2006 he's been grinding articles about LDS subjects. And he doesn't seem to like the idea of Mia Love joining the Mormon church and becoming a prominent Republican politician. Or something? TL:DR plus there are loads of sockpuppet accounts in there. Blubbering about shit. She's been a target of bigoted Mormons for a long time. Lambert was the original creator of the article in 2012.

As for Lambert's history.....465,000 edits, mostly content, not much patrolling or talkpage/AN bullshitting. One would think they would make a deal with the guy to keep him editing. But hell no. Must punish and torture. Ha ha ha.

I propose that all those nerdy shitheads on AN should just piss off. But we can't have nice things.

PS: Thanks for the headache. Need beer.

Post Reply