Tails Wx @ RfA

Editors, Admins and Bureaucrats blecch!
User avatar
ChaosMeRee
Sucker
Posts: 225
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2023 11:59 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 155 times

Tails Wx @ RfA

Post by ChaosMeRee » Wed Dec 27, 2023 4:34 pm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... p/Tails_Wx

It says a lot about Wikipedia when an RfA nominator (who is also an Arbitrator!) makes you wonder if they are being intentionally obtuse or absolutely incompetent.....
To be clear, there are no prior usernames to disclose. Barkeep49 (talk) 03:17, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
That is on its face, a lie.

It is apparently a truth only because in the bizarro world of RfA, "prior usernames" doesn't include previous names of the current account (or it's declared altenates). Work that out if you can.

The history of Tails Wx is in fact incredibly complicated for someone who has been on Wikipedia for only three years....
Tails Wx disclosed two alternate accounts on this RfA with the acceptance of the nomination. These are Tails Wx9 and Tails Wx1. Severestorm28 = Sarrail = Tails Wx. Severestorm00 = Sarrail2 = Tails Wx9. Tails Wx1 was created in February 2023 after the rename of both Sarrail and Sarrail2 to Tails Wx and Tails Wx9 respectively. Mr rnddude (talk) 17:45, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
It took me all of five seconds to figure out even this may not be the whole story. Who is "Kangsea0" in this edit?

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... 1046862009

But even if we stick to the official version unearthed after much confusing back and forth in the RfA (but without any input from the subject themselves other than a less than forthcoming answer to a straight question, and who seems to be taking an extraordinarily long time to answer a question related to this sketchy history which includes a mystery deletion and recreation of their user page), it still doesn't inspire confidence.

This freak has not one but two alternate accounts for editing from public computers, even though he has barely even used the second, most recent one (Tails Wx1), except perhaps for a deletion (it has four edits, three now deleted). And yet he hasn't thought to retire it and mark it as defunct in his talk page and RfA declarations. The first alt account is still in regular use, including to edit his own main user page/space. Which is just asking for trouble.

This freak has also renamed themselves not once but twice, for no better reason than they didn't like their old user names. If you're wondering if that might show they are perhaps a child, someone who is immature and indecisive, you might be right, since their choice of "Tails Wx" is evidently a reflection of the fact they love Sonic the Hedgehog and their interest in Wikipedia is weather related articles.

The first rename (Severestorm xx -> Sarrail xx) was in November 2022. The second (Sarrail xx -> Tails xx) was as recent as February 2023. So almost half of this user's entire edit history was under previous names, even though they supposedly didn't like them (they don't even explain what it is they didn't like). An edit history and persona that people are now being expected to recall for study at RfA. Over Christmas!

Despite this matter alone raising several questions regarding their capacity for honesty, maturity and and even basic competence, the freak is sailing through, and the one person taking issue with this is being beaten up.

User avatar
badmachine
Sucker
Posts: 460
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:55 am
Has thanked: 571 times
Been thanked: 262 times
Contact:

Re: Tails Wx @ RfA

Post by badmachine » Wed Dec 27, 2023 4:44 pm

well, Kangsea0 could be a reference to an internet meme "we wuz kangs" but there are other possibilities i suppose. but in three years this user has been renamed at least a few times. usually when a user is renamed, the wikipedians leave a redirect from the old user page to the new one, but not in this case:
User:Severestorm28
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Severestorm28" is not registered on this wiki. Please check CentralAuth to see if the account is registered on other wikis.
This user has been renamed. The rename log is provided below for reference.

19:48, 9 August 2022 QueerEcofeminist talk contribs renamed user Severestorm28 (6963 edits) to Sarrail (per request)
This page does not exist. The deletion, protection, and move log for the page are provided below for reference.

18:39, 21 September 2023 Liz talk contribs deleted page User:Severestorm28 (G8: Redirect to deleted page "User:Tails Wx") Tag: Twinkle (thank)
19:49, 9 August 2022 QueerEcofeminist talk contribs moved page User:Severestorm28 to User:Sarrail (Automatically moved page while renaming the user "Severestorm28" to "Sarrail") (revert) (thank)
there are seven redirects to their user talk page:
User talk:Kangsea0 (redirect page) ‎ (links | edit)
User talk:Tails Wx9 (redirect page) ‎ (links | edit)
User talk:Severestorm28 (redirect page) ‎ (links | edit)
User talk:Severestorm00 (redirect page) ‎ (links | edit)
User talk:Sarrail (redirect page) ‎ (links | edit)
User talk:Sarrail2 (redirect page) ‎ (links | edit)
User talk:Tails Wx1 (redirect page) ‎ (links | edit)
(edited)
Last edited by badmachine on Wed Dec 27, 2023 4:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
ChaosMeRee
Sucker
Posts: 225
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2023 11:59 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 155 times

Re: Tails Wx @ RfA

Post by ChaosMeRee » Wed Dec 27, 2023 9:40 pm

Wow.
23:26, 12 October 2021‎ Mykola7 talk contribs‎ 84 bytes +84‎ Mykola7 moved page User talk:Kangsea0 to User talk:Severestorm28: Automatically moved page while renaming the user "Kangsea0" to "Severestorm28"
It's honest!y fucking hilarious nobody has even noticed there was a fourth account name, or that the user has not once ever referred to his previous names in this RfA except obliquely.

The guy changes user names like other people change their shoes! That's three former identities in three years before settling on a fourth, the first for just over a year, the second for just over a year again, and the third for only a few months. His current identity is only ten months old.

No wonder he apparently hadn't had time to familiarise himself with BEFORE until LAST MONTH, the guy has been too busy calling the removal vans and packing and unpacking his shit.

With the recent revelations about banned users passing RfA quite easily, you would think the Wikipedians would be jumpy as fuck about sketchy stuff like this.

The guy is either not on the level of just a fucking idiot. My money is on the latter.

User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 4649
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Location: The ass-tral plane
Has thanked: 1165 times
Been thanked: 1855 times

Re: Tails Wx @ RfA

Post by ericbarbour » Thu Dec 28, 2023 12:04 am

ChaosMeRee wrote:
Wed Dec 27, 2023 4:34 pm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... p/Tails_Wx

It says a lot about Wikipedia when an RfA nominator (who is also an Arbitrator!) makes you wonder if they are being intentionally obtuse or absolutely incompetent.....
To be clear, there are no prior usernames to disclose. Barkeep49 (talk) 03:17, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
That is on its face, a lie.
Not unusual, though more rare in recent years. In the early 2000s they lied about each other's edit histories constantly and RFAs were full of utter bullshit. How "nice" to see this "old fashioned" RFA, complete with dozens of obvious sockpuppets entering YES votes. :lol: Some stupid Wiki-things never change.

BTY, Barkeep49's stupid comment remained. It was added here. Do not be surprised if Banks Irk, a content editor for TEN YEARS, gets banned soon. Things like this are typical warning signs.
This freak has not one but two alternate accounts for editing from public computers, even though he has barely even used the second, most recent one (Tails Wx1), except perhaps for a deletion (it has four edits, three now deleted). And yet he hasn't thought to retire it and mark it as defunct in his talk page and RfA declarations. The first alt account is still in regular use, including to edit his own main user page/space. Which is just asking for trouble.

This freak has also renamed themselves not once but twice, for no better reason than they didn't like their old user names. If you're wondering if that might show they are perhaps a child, someone who is immature and indecisive, you might be right, since their choice of "Tails Wx" is evidently a reflection of the fact they love Sonic the Hedgehog and their interest in Wikipedia is weather related articles.

The first rename (Severestorm xx -> Sarrail xx) was in November 2022. The second (Sarrail xx -> Tails xx) was as recent as February 2023. So almost half of this user's entire edit history was under previous names, even though they supposedly didn't like them (they don't even explain what it is they didn't like). An edit history and persona that people are now being expected to recall for study at RfA. Over Christmas!
I have seen Tails Wx buggering around with weather-related content before. And I would not be surprised to learn he(?)'s running dozens of socks. Maybe hundreds. I suspect the freak owns at least two or three "undeclared accounts" at Wikiproject Weather. It is like the Roads wikiproject: OCD central.

As you can see here, the freak has been fighting off people trying to put conservative-friendly content in articles, or editing their own bios. Thus making him/her/it/? "useful" for the biased insider gang.
Last edited by ericbarbour on Thu Dec 28, 2023 12:28 am, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
badmachine
Sucker
Posts: 460
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:55 am
Has thanked: 571 times
Been thanked: 262 times
Contact:

Re: Tails Wx @ RfA

Post by badmachine » Thu Dec 28, 2023 1:02 am

ericbarbour wrote:
Thu Dec 28, 2023 12:04 am
BTY, Barkeep49's stupid comment remained. It was added here. Do not be surprised if Banks Irk, a content editor for TEN YEARS, gets banned soon. Things like this are typical warning signs.
someone already poked at him on the RFA talkpage about questioning the candidate too much:
link

User avatar
gnngl
Sucks
Posts: 33
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2023 12:00 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 16 times

Re: Tails Wx @ RfA

Post by gnngl » Thu Dec 28, 2023 6:57 am

ericbarbour wrote:
Thu Dec 28, 2023 12:04 am
How "nice" to see this "old fashioned" RFA, complete with dozens of obvious sockpuppets entering YES votes. :lol:
Clearly you're better at spotting them, I can't see any

User avatar
Bbb23sucks
Sucker
Posts: 1365
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2023 9:08 am
Location: The Astral Plane
Has thanked: 1301 times
Been thanked: 279 times

Re: Tails Wx @ RfA

Post by Bbb23sucks » Thu Dec 28, 2023 7:24 am

gnngl wrote:
Thu Dec 28, 2023 6:57 am
ericbarbour wrote:
Thu Dec 28, 2023 12:04 am
How "nice" to see this "old fashioned" RFA, complete with dozens of obvious sockpuppets entering YES votes. :lol:
Clearly you're better at spotting them, I can't see any
This account is obviously a sock: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cremastra

Created a year ago, most contributions are just anti-vandalism, and their first edit showed advanced knowledge of editing: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... 1099445803

Proceeded to use their sandbox to create an infobox with no help on the first try. Within 15 edits, they were already using advanced gadgets: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... 1099855915

They also bludgeoned every one who voted oppose.

----

This account also seems a bit sketch: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... r&dir=prev

First few edits are normal and very beginner-like, but then they leave for two years, come back and immediately install twinkle. I'm going to say that they might be a sock that was forgotten and then later brought back, but I'm not 100%. Their activity, while somewhat weird, isn't fully out of the realm of possibility and could be real.
"Globally banned" since September 5, 2023 for exposing harassment.

User avatar
ChaosMeRee
Sucker
Posts: 225
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2023 11:59 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 155 times

Re: Tails Wx @ RfA

Post by ChaosMeRee » Fri Dec 29, 2023 1:44 am

This RfA is becoming unreal.

I feel like I'm watching a kindergarten class select their own teachers.

This can't be just the desperation factor arising from the recruitment crisis. This has got to have something to do with the timing of the nomination, surely.

Has anyone even realised the co-nominator has only been an Administrator themselves for six months I wonder? Shit like that really should be explicitly noted in an RfA somehow. As well as basic shit like their former usernames.

If not, well, they really have no excuse if this turns out to be Lourdes again.

User avatar
Bbb23sucks
Sucker
Posts: 1365
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2023 9:08 am
Location: The Astral Plane
Has thanked: 1301 times
Been thanked: 279 times

Re: Tails Wx @ RfA

Post by Bbb23sucks » Sat Dec 30, 2023 8:12 pm

Lol. He withdrew it.
"Globally banned" since September 5, 2023 for exposing harassment.

User avatar
ChaosMeRee
Sucker
Posts: 225
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2023 11:59 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 155 times

Re: Tails Wx @ RfA

Post by ChaosMeRee » Sat Dec 30, 2023 9:05 pm

Bbb23sucks wrote:
Sat Dec 30, 2023 8:12 pm
Lol. He withdrew it.
And only seemingly when failure was assured.

The correct withdrawal procedure as mandated by His Holiness is to be seen to do the right thing when it is still in your gift to do so. Only then are you rewarded for your evident sound judgement and deep faith.

He had plenty of people pointing out opposition based on things he could theoretically fix by simply withdrawing well before he had slipped out of a creditable support level. At one point he seemed to want to be, or just did not realise the stupidity of being, a lame duck Admin. Elected by fluke of timing and mass inattention.

He can get better at policy. He can get better at answering questions. He can work on everything, and ultimately succeed. But he probably can't do that if he lacks the maturity right now to see a storm coming and run away from it in good time, rather than toward it like some wierd human-lemming hybrid.

One suspects he was so poor a candidate he may have even had to be told to withdraw, on the quiet. If so, dude, you need to be quicker on the draw than that to make it look convincing.

As ever, the nominators bear much of the responsibility for this farce and have serious questions to answer about how seriously they take this stuff.

I fear they will not do so.

If you don't like watching innocent lambs get torn to pieces by savage wolves, if you don't like ending up in a cohort of larger but in hindsight deeply odd looking support votes, if that is your idea of a "horribly broken process", then here's an idea for you all to consider....

Stop chucking innocent lambs into a pack of wolves!

Just a thought.

Check that your chosen projectile is not a lamb but a stallion. Ride them first. You will soon know the difference.

One runs and jumps. The other does not. Unless you yourself are a munchkin. Hey, no judgements. If so, adjust your perspectives.

Standards are definitely slipping, desperation over the recruitment crisis is still driving many people to do many silly things. But let's get real. There is no reform of RfA that will ever let such obviously suspect candidates through without sending up some kind of warning sign that brings the wolves sniffing at petticoats. RfA won't change at all without commensurate reform of the other end. Make it easier, far far easier, to undo a mistaken or even corrupt pass. Stop holiday noms altogether.

Enough with the rookies nominating rookies. Do something, for fuck's sake.

It was the evasive silliness over a simple but important issue like full disclosure of all prior usernames and the pearl clutching over one single TOOMUCHOFAPUSSY vote that drew my interest, and no doubt others.

I then found an undisclosed username by complete accident, in five minutes. I was not impressed, Wikipedians.

That's Ritchie level stupidity.

Lourdes wouldn't even have to try hard at all if this is your current level of alertness.

Try coffee. Or amphetamines.

Pull an all nighter now and then.

And hold proper inquests, because......

I STILL DON'T KNOW IF BARKEEP WAS TRYING TO BE DISCRETE, CLEVER, OR WAS JUST COMPLETELY NEGLIGENT.

Y'all might want to check on that, because he is now what passes for a very experienced Arbitrator on your project. Nobody higher except the occasional sprout farts of the Ghosts of ArbCom past.

How about turning over a new leaf for 2024?

DO YOUR FUCKING JOBS

Or just all jump into the sea already.

HTD.

Post Reply