Page 1 of 1
Wikipedia Admins to be Noted
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2024 1:38 pm
by Abbe Busoni
What are the most egregious examples of bias on Wikipedia you guys have found? I've always known Wikipedia was very biased, but even I was surprised when I started looking at the personal views of the members and how radical they were even by modern standards. In your experience, who are the most politicized admins? Good quotes are always welcome too.
Re: Wikipedia Admins to be Noted
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2024 2:38 pm
by badmachine
the most biased article ive seen on wikipedia is
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_or_ ... nald_Trump
most biased policy or policy-like thing is
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_Nazis ... the wikipedians will say 'JUST AN ESSAY NOT POLICY' yet this 'essay' gets thrown around more than most policies.
the most biased admin imho would be
Tamzin. who wrote the above essay/policy-like thing, by the way.
Re: Wikipedia Admins to be Noted
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2024 3:46 pm
by Abbe Busoni
Thanks for the response. Yeah, I've already documented Tamzin actually, even using this forum, specifically the Rfa where he was promoted. He seems to be the most biased, but there are many other contenders!
Re: Wikipedia Admins to be Noted
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2024 4:19 pm
by gnngl
Re: Wikipedia Admins to be Noted
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2024 7:10 pm
by Bbb23sucks
Welcome!
The most biased article I would say is
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecuti ... s_in_China (which was until recently called "Uyghur Genocide")