Drmies

Editors, Admins and Bureaucrats blecch!
User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Drmies

Post by CrowsNest » Sun Jan 27, 2019 12:09 pm

Just exudes professionalism and trustworthiness, doesn't he?

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... =880317427

I totally endorse this--I ran a quick CU on the IsraelAssa account, and there's enough there for a real CU, one who isn't in need of a nap right now. Drmies (talk) 19:31, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
He must have even having his nap with his boyfriend BBb23, as surprisingly for an incident involving CU with these two, he wasn't the very next person to be seen involved.

To be clear just how this comment should be read in terms of just professionalism alone, this is a tenured professor who has already served one term on ArbCom, and as such, has been a CheckUser for several years now. He did not get get given that powerful tool because he asked for it, he has it simply because of his one unremarkable term, it being bundled with the role, and he has never been shy about his inability to use it properly. It can no longer be argued he has the will or the skill to learn. The way he got CU mirrors the way he got tenure, by deception, leveraging the fact there are people out there who don't understand Wikipedia.

He failed in his bid for a second term, and it has to have been in some part due to how much of a fucking amateur he comes across as in an area of Administration as serious as the handling of privileged personal information, even in the eyes of the Wikipedians, for whom the negative connotations of the word amateur is oh so fitting. Despite that ability to at least recognise obvious fuck ups, their institutional incompetence means he gets to keep this special power for life.

The less said about the fact they give it to people who need to take naps, the better. Some might say that as a joke, perhaps because they don't want to reveal they are AFK because they have to go to marriage counselling (although Wikipedia of course attracts Administrators who are happily so open), but as bad as his marriage must be, you can be reasonably certain Drmies is being truthful, he is literally having a nap. Wikipedia addiction is a tiring business, even for those who don't feel constrained but the social convention of not editing while you're supposed to be working your actual job, or paying your wife and family due care and attention.

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm

Re: Drmies

Post by Graaf Statler » Sun Jan 27, 2019 1:08 pm

What we need here is a psychiatrist, or a other expert who knows everything about addictions, Crow. How can explane us what here is going on.

Our Mies is uit een goed nest, he is from a respected, clearly wealthy Dutch family. IfI look to his pickture I see a friendly, intelligent man, what he clearly is. Very intelligent if I look for instance to this posting in the Dutch village pump with his Natuur12 sock.

Het trekken van conclusies en doen van aanbevelingen zou inderdaad een taak van de gemeenschap kunnen zijn. Maar of de gemeenschap echt met wat bruikbaars gaat komen? Bovendien ben ik stiekem gewoon benieuwd naar wat Irene van Bokhoven denkt en zou aanbevelen. Gezien haar staat van dienst en de onderwerpen van eerder onderzoek van haar hand verwacht ik dat dergelijke aanbevelingen veel meerwaarde hebben en concreet kunnen bijdragen aan het aanpakken van de vele problemen waar we als gemeenschap tegenaan lopen. Natuur12 (overleg) 24 jan 2019 22:59 (CET)


It is about some open deuren intrap survey of WMnl. Kick a door in what is already open. And he is complete right, there is no conclusion, and nobody is able to draw any conclusion out of that survey other than there is nothing to do about it in the wiki system, and this are facts what we all know for years. Of course nobody is interested in that mouvement strategy, because there is non except some nonsens (Table talk) translated by a German WMF person in broken Dutch after Robin(WMF) had blew it complete. Of course it is even more a brothel than it was before with captain Natuur12 on the bridge, Ymnes as super talent and a few gender freaks and Mdd and Romaine as a crew the last few years after I was trolled out. What else do you expect? A better Wikipedia? So, again a complete waisting of donor money.

But its is here about Drmies and not about the complete (gender) idiots of WPnl. And in my opinion Mies is a man who has everything in life a man can wish but he is missing something. And in his postings with his Natuur12 sock in the past he was often talking about whisky and other spirituals he was drinking, so I think there is something going on with this person. Because his absolute out of character behaving.

He is often cheating people like for instance the Dutch gender lady's in a very subtile way and sabotaging way, just like he is doing in this posting. Because that Irene has of course not even a clou about Wikipedia, she is just some employer of a universal researcher firm without any specifiek knowledge or expertise about WP, so she can't give any solutions, that is clear. She did here best, but she is leaking any expertise and was complete relating on the information the Dutch gender lady gave here, what as we noticed before is not the top of there gender. Ze hebben bepaald niet het buskruit uitgevonden, they didn't invent the gunpowder. And he has noticed that too, and puts her if front as a expert. What she is clearly not is about Wikipedia. And that is Drmies at his best.

And in this way he is operating all the time. He acts very concerned, but in the same time he is using his intelligents to sabotage.

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Drmies

Post by CrowsNest » Tue Jan 29, 2019 10:11 am

A perfect example of what Drmies is all about.......
Can you explain me why you have reverted my edit on SkyTeam page "And yet we require a secondary source"? In that case, the photo is enough to prove the airline is in the alliance, eyes are our source. The logo on the plane means only that the airline is part of the alliance, nothing more. And that is what i wrote. --Wind of freedom (talk) 01:26, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Yes it is, and yet we do require a secondary source, for many reasons. Look it up in WP:V. And what do you mean with "are you a bot?" Are you trying to insult me? I don't always mind being insulted, but I'd like to know. Maybe it's a young people thing, in which case I can use it with my kids and sound cool. And you kind of owe Jetstreamer an apology for this. Drmies (talk) 01:28, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
There's the usual weird crap (why would kids be insulting each other with Wikipedia terminology?), and the usual behavioural stupidity (starting an edit war to enforce the rejection of obviously true information, rather than take the five seconds to source it) and unhelpful Admin stupidity (WP:V doesn't even contain the words image or photo) and basic policy stupidity (you really don't need a secondary source for a basic fact like whether an airline is part of an alliance, and there is a primary source from said alliance, unsurprisingly).

The best was saved to last though.....this is supposedly what he owes an apology for.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... =879807325

And yet we have seen Drmies wrongly accuse editors of vandalism countless times.

An ignorant motherfucker, a hypocrite and a bully. Who is also a Wikipedia Administrator and CheckUser.

All in a day's work for HAVE A NICE DAY Drmies.

You can be this bad as a Wikipedia Administrator, and even then all it means to the community is they fail to get elected to the Arbitration Committee, the place theoretically reserved for the very best thirteen Administrators on the whole site.

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm

Re: Drmies

Post by Graaf Statler » Tue Jan 29, 2019 11:50 am

And what do you mean with "are you a bot?" Are you trying to insult me?Drmies (talk) 01:28, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Nobody is insulting you,Mies. Because we all understand you, MoiraMoira (NL) and many of these brave vandal fighters are using bots often operated by others. Ymnes even lost complete track once when he continued editing on the Moira troll bot about his Caribbean project. I have given the evidences and links on WO, and uncle Jack was so mad at me, you remember? Never do that again was his warning to me. Otherwise you will get blocked.

And do you remember the 96 and tittles, tietjes incident? A typical bot incident by misinterpretation a few key words by the bot used on your account?
And what is going on here Mies? it is in Dutch, I know. A huge bot incident and a lot of lies, for sure I don't have to explane what happend to you. Because you was the one who cleared the road to the bot generated articles by eliminating me when I understood what was going on. And we also understand why Multichill/Romaine, Mdd and Ed0 have a almost holy status on WP. We are not as stupide as you think Drmies.
And yes, uncle yummy Jimboo has to keep on lying on his twitter about the European elections, that is always the matter in a pyramid scheme. it is a trap, a Hotel in California, you simple can't leave.

Wikipedia is possibly the biggest scam in history. People join hoping they can add a personal touch, than all individuality is erased from their contributions. Fun!

You should know fucking better, Michel.

Author: IP76.31.110.124 (With thanks to the Encyclopedia Dramatica, article Jimbo Wales.)

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Drmies

Post by CrowsNest » Tue Jan 29, 2019 4:33 pm

It continues, of course (inbetween people ignoring what Drmies does in favour of just licking his ring)....
Nobody want insult you, i asked just because your edit was just a minute after mine. You remove a big part about airports and location. Should it be removed from Star Alliance and Oneworld pages too? About Joon, I start talking about it on SkyTeam talk page, if you want say your opionion. --Wind of freedom (talk) 14:36, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Well I'm glad to hear that. Please consider that humor and sarcasm don't always come across very well--no one ever gets my jokes, for example. Anyway, the stuff I removed seemed to be nothing more than directory information; this is an encyclopedia, and a list of where in the world the airline's kiosks and helpdesks are is just not a thing we should be doing. If you find that in other articles, sure, see if it should go. Longer articles with more content aren't necessarily better! Thanks, Drmies (talk) 16:21, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
If nobody gets your jokes, why keep making them? Freak.

As usual, his attempts to explain his actions are incomplete and entirely self-serving. Wikipedia quite clearly wants the informative Drmies started an edit war to remove......

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... =880716778

.....and yet Drmies chooses not to comment on the discussion he has forced the user to begin, just because he's that kind of a prick. Everyone's time is less valuable than his, even though all he is doing is hacking at Wikipedia when he's meant to be doing his paid job.

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Drmies

Post by CrowsNest » Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:35 am

https://www.wikipediasucks.co/forum/vie ... 8150#p8150

A classic example of how Drmies simply doing what he does, will always inevitably start major dramas that have implications far beyond that which he intended with his aggressive and arrogant approach. We could be looking at yet another extremely long and drawn out ARCA surrounding the Rambling Man problem, the second in as many months, all because of Drmies' love of being a dick.

Even if they don't care how Drmies doing what he does affects ordinary editors or the reputation of Wikipedia, you would think seeing stuff like this escalating into brush fires, consuming thousands of manhours, would alert the Wikipedians that Drmies is a serious threat to what they perceive as good order, and a massive distraction to their claimed mission.

Arguably, they are beginning to notice, but simply denying him a seat on ArbCom won't stop him starting fires. Who knows, perhaps Drmies being hurt by his rejection by the community for another seat on the top table, is why he feels he can get away with poking one of the most notorious unstable users on Wikipedia, then walking away, as if it was nothing.

BTW, the irony of Drmies complaining that someone else is guilty of "douchebaggish edit summaries". Just another blatant example of his hypocrisy. This whole incident was, to be honest.

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm

Re: Drmies

Post by Graaf Statler » Thu Jan 31, 2019 12:44 pm

He is good. He is really good, our Drmies, but on WPnl he is at his best in his Natuur12 coat. Meis is a fireman who a fire extinguishes with gasoline. Mies is real clever, he is the ultimate troll just like De Kolonel is.

They love Wikipedia because it is a trolls paradise, special because of the "solutions" of WMF and Wikimedia. The gender the gender nonsens is one of there favorites in combination of good faith. Special because the lady's are not the top segment of there genderpool (sic).
They manage it constant to get the biggest idiot on the shield. If there a complete idiot like Ymnes who believes everything they say? They make him a top editor and not only that, they make the gender lady's and the wiki cabal to believe that too. Is there a complete idiot in the house die niet als een ander is? Perfect sysop! Perfect Arb. Perfect Steward, just what we need.

And that gender lady's and the cabal understand dammed well there is something wrong, but not what. So they ask all kind of internet experts who doesn't understand the structure of Wikipedia, and yes...... these "experts" are the next willing victim of there trolling. They are trolled in every direction, except the right one. So, they come up with a even more foolish solutions, and in that way the cirkel is round. Because these guys are much more clever than all that rented "specialists". Only a few people on this world are able to understand what Wikipedia really is, and Crow, Drmies, De Kolonel and I belong to that group.

And me? I am only the self declared fake-lawer of the Silk Road, a cabal living in one of the many sewers under Wikipedia under the bridge. You can find my definition of the Silk Road in Dutch here.
In fact Wikipedia is so far out of the world what I experience that it is me simple not worth to troll or to sock, and that is the true.
Last edited by Graaf Statler on Thu Jan 31, 2019 9:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Drmies

Post by CrowsNest » Thu Jan 31, 2019 7:01 pm

If you didn't previously see Drmies as the meek obedient husband to the all powerful Queen Bishonen, watch him jump in lock-step with her against her nemesis Jimmy.....
I think you should permanently refrain from editing this entry and leave it to those who are more neutral.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 16:52, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

I think TonyBallioni brings objectivity and wisdom to this discussion, and I would encourage him to continue editing, rather than to abstain. Binksternet (talk) 16:58, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Me too. I think Jimbo Wales should permanently refrain from attempting to throw shade at our best admins. Bishonen | talk 17:34, 30 January 2019 (UTC).

Me three. Jimbo Wales, I'm surprised to see you claim that admin X is not neutral and "just doesn't like the subject"--we hear that bogus argument all the time in AfD discussions, for instance. Slatersteven, wut? Whoever you were patronizing, the other party doesn't need your help, I'm sure. Drmies (talk) 18:26, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
That was his one and only contribution, showing he had absolutely no interest other than echoing his master. That piece of sniping at Jimmy was her only interest in the issue too, but Drmies of course had no issue with that, not that he would even dare say anything if he did.

Showing all the class he is known for, he of course had a problem with another Admin saying this.....
Can users please remember to comment on content, not users conduct, if you have an issue with a users conduct either report it or complain on their talk page. Slatersteven (talk) 16:44, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Perfectly sensible advice, indeed basic Wikipedia policy, that it followed, would severely hamper Bishonen doing what she likes to do, so no surprise to see her lap dog yapping in protest.

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm

Re: Drmies

Post by Graaf Statler » Thu Jan 31, 2019 9:58 pm

What I notice is that you see always the name TonyBallioni in this kind of discussions. Where Drmies is, is TonyBallioni. That was the same in that fight over the power over WQ with Whaledad, who was there? Tony. Tony is a kind of shadow of Mies. (We use in Dutch often the short name Mies for someone with the name Michel, but Mies is also a girls name.)

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Drmies

Post by CrowsNest » Fri Feb 01, 2019 1:37 pm

The sheer arrogance of the man, is astounding. The gall he has, to assume people don't know this is a blatant case of 'do as I say, not as I do'......
Statement by Drmies

Didn't realize we were here. We wouldn't have been, had it not been for that edit summary of TRM's. I think most everyone is familiar with his abrasive and dismissive commentary, his lack of respect for fellow editors and especially admins, and so am I. I'm sure someone can find the set of edit summaries in relation to that time, a few months ago, when I, meaning no harm, mentioned him in relation to some matter on DYK or ERRORS or something; TRM apparently needed some admin to help out with something, I didn't know how to do it, so I asked for a volunteer on AN and TRM blew his top cause OMG I mentioned his name. Since then I've completely disregarded him; I don't look at his edits, I don't look at his talk page, I don't try to assist him with ERRORS etc. (the record can show that I did), though I know he does a lot of good work there.

But then this--I don't know if this is because I'm an admin, and we all suck, or because I'm me, and I suck. What I do know is that it's bad manners to display that kind of personal hostility in an edit summary. I don't care if he blasts me on his talk page (I don't look at it, and after he first pinged me and then told me to fuck off I haven't looked at it, though someone pinged me from it, I believe), I really don't. But don't take that hostility into edit summaries, for everyday viewers and editors to see. Alex, if you're wondering why I responded why I did, it's because that remark ("you don't know shit, there's a million references even though only one is cited") was in an edit summary, in what would everywhere else be called a personal attack or at least a lack of AGF. If my edit is wrong, he can explain this in human language, focusing on the edit, not on me--this is standard operating procedure: focus on the edit, not the editor. TRM used to be an admin; he should know this.

I'm not sure I care much whether TRM gets slapped on the wrist or blocked for this, or whatever. Of course it's a violation, but meh. But if one of you could tell him that if he wants me to leave him alone, he should start by leaving me alone, that would be great. Seems straightforward to me. Drmies (talk) 02:10, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Post Reply