The guy he accused of being a racist for saying "sonny boy" to his pyscopath buddy Malik, would disagree. Certainly once Drmies had stalked him across Wikipedia until such time as he could block him, all the while claiming it was not a violation of WP:INVOLVED, not to mention basic common sense. It was the act of someone whose judgement is so comprimised, he battled to convince ArbCom Malik was fit to retain his tools at any time, no questions asked. They'd certainly be asking some fucking questions now, wouldn't they? Because Malik has revealed his true nature quite a lot now, and it sure as shit has nothing to with how the community supposedly "let him down" by not doing what Drmies wanted.Drmies wrote:Do they have a policy where slander is removed and scrubbed? No, I don't "seek" a thread; I now have even less interest in that website. If they can't keep that kind of stuff out, it's just trash. On Wikipedia, we have policies for that, and I like to think we follow through on them. If you have anything to do with that website, and if you are actually concerned with real people, I trust you'll take appropriate action.
Nobody else on Wikipedia gave much of a shit for that episode of obvious slander and definite harassment, so he can stick his policies right up his rectum and choke on it.
And why is he still pretending there is only one critic site out there? He was given our name, he knows where we are. Still doesn't seem interested in what we have to say. He's only concerned with the pussies of Wikipediocracy, who he can intimidate, because most of them are shit scared of what he might do to their Wikipedia accounts of they tell the truth, if they tell his truth. Because they saw what he did to that guy, just like I did. They want no part of that.
Ben je je moerstaal vergeten, Mies? Een tiet, twee tieten, twee