Drmies

Editors, Admins and Bureaucrats Oh my!
User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Drmies

Post by CrowsNest » Sat Oct 05, 2019 12:46 pm

Funny on so many levels.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know/Archive_161#Fit_in_or_fuck_off

Remember, this is the guy who opposed Fram because he couldn't tell the difference between constructive criticism and righteous warfare.
Last edited by CrowsNest on Wed Nov 27, 2019 8:44 pm, edited 4 times in total.
Reason: use [url] tag

User avatar
JuiceBeetle
Sucks Mod
Posts: 675
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2019 8:27 pm
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 38 times

Re: Drmies

Post by JuiceBeetle » Sat Oct 05, 2019 6:05 pm


FIFO: Wikipedia does not need you - Drmies essay, the press-approved version
#Bbbgate

User avatar
Guido den Broeder
Sucks
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2018 2:45 pm

Re: Drmies

Post by Guido den Broeder » Sat Oct 05, 2019 6:57 pm

Vigil-ant only now found this, where Drmies and Iridescent both proclaim that Fram was right to call me a pedophile, except for using the actual word, Drmies further illustrating his hatred for me with the word 'fucking'. Everybody there thinks that's totally fine.

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm

Re: Drmies

Post by Graaf Statler » Sat Oct 05, 2019 7:08 pm

It was linked on WO, I had read and noticed that before too.
And the huge scandal is that Drmies guy is Dutch and simple have to now what we know about Fram, Guido.
For sure he knows what a fraud that Fram guy is. If you claim such a terrible thing, you have to prove it with hard evidence or simple have to shut up.

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Drmies

Post by CrowsNest » Sat Oct 05, 2019 7:21 pm

Guido den Broeder wrote:Vigil-ant only now found this, where Drmies and Iridescent both proclaim that Fram was right to call me a pedophile, except for using the actual word, Drmies further illustrating his hatred for me with the word 'fucking'. Everybody there thinks that's totally fine.
Yup. Finding a way to say it without saying it, is their idea of civility. All too readily accepted behaviour.

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm

Re: Drmies

Post by Graaf Statler » Sat Oct 05, 2019 11:07 pm

MIes: I am a professor and Guido the F Broeder.

And not I was complete wrong with Guido, it appeared Fram is a convicted cocaine smuggler who was editing from a Belgium prison. Sorry Guido.

Because that is what I should expect from a professor. Just as I want to say now sorry for sometimes misinterpretation of your personalty by me in the past Guido, but sometimes the whole situation was very confusing.

But anyway my excuses, Guido.

Martin

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Drmies

Post by CrowsNest » Mon Oct 07, 2019 2:57 pm

Clearly asking too much of this guy to answer a novice's question without including all his baggage.....
Concise
Hi, Drmies. I have a question: Do articles in Wikipedia need to be concise? --Manwë986 (talk) 22:31, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Absolutely--unless they're about K-pop or crimes, or Star Trek, D&D, the War in Syria, anything to do with Trump, the Hong Kong protests. In other words, anything covered by detractors of NOTNEWS or fans of something. Yes, good articles are concise and have no more detail than required. But that's just my opinion. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 00:02, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
Did he even answer the question satisfactorily? Absolutely is an answer I suppose, but hardly one the user can refer back to in an editing dispute, or just for general information. It's an interesting question - what policy or guideline (or even information page) best explains/describes the need/aim/requirement that Wikipedia articles be concise? I doubt Drmies even knows. I don't either, not without diving into the rabbit warren, but it's not my job to answer novice's questions about Wikipedia to the best of my ability (even if that means handing them off to someone who can answer). I suspect this is Drmies' view of his role too.

User avatar
JuiceBeetle
Sucks Mod
Posts: 675
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2019 8:27 pm
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 38 times

Re: Drmies

Post by JuiceBeetle » Mon Oct 07, 2019 5:12 pm

CrowsNest wrote:Did he even answer the question satisfactorily?

He's saying something funny, so people don't complain, but distracting and of little value. That's a troll answer: trolls want nothing more, just to have some fun at the expense of serious, hard-working people. That's Drmies. As Larry Sanger said: "the trolls came in and took over".
#Bbbgate

Post Reply