Ritchie333

Editors, Admins and Bureaucrats blecch!
User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Ritchie333

Post by CrowsNest » Sat Sep 21, 2019 10:22 pm

:lol:
09:53, 21 September 2019 diff hist -4‎ Blind Faith ‎ rvv - HELLO ANY ANTI VANDALISM EDITORS HERE?
What an ass.

Anyway, to be clear, this is supposedly the non-crazy Ritchie, right? The one not experiencing random anger due to personal issues?

User avatar
JuiceBeetle
Sucks Warrior
Posts: 681
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2019 8:27 pm
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 45 times

Re: Ritchie333

Post by JuiceBeetle » Sat Sep 21, 2019 11:40 pm

I wish you were adding links to these:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Blind_Faith&diff=prev&oldid=916918364

Lol, that's an "emotional" (childish, unprofessional) edit comment. Harmless, though.

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Ritchie333

Post by CrowsNest » Tue Sep 24, 2019 5:03 pm

I repeat, if this is Ritchie when he's better....

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... =917211658

..... :?:

Perhaps his new friends at Wikipediocracy can clear this up. Only if they think he is up to it of course.

User avatar
Kumioko
Sucks Mod
Posts: 860
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2017 11:54 pm
Has thanked: 43 times
Been thanked: 177 times

Re: Ritchie333

Post by Kumioko » Tue Sep 24, 2019 6:18 pm

JuiceBeetle wrote:I wish you were adding links to these:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Blind_Faith&diff=prev&oldid=916918364

Lol, that's an "emotional" (childish, unprofessional) edit comment. Harmless, though.

That's pretty typical Ritchie though.
#BbbGate

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm

Re: Ritchie333

Post by Graaf Statler » Tue Sep 24, 2019 6:51 pm

@Staff! Please, he is now so dominant disturbing and I think he doesn't stop before he has that wanted stamp of the teacher.

Image

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Ritchie333

Post by CrowsNest » Thu Oct 03, 2019 4:35 pm

Just so everyone remembers, this is how Ritchie acts when he's feeling good.....

https://www.wikipediasucks.co/forum/vie ... 947#p13947

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Ritchie333

Post by CrowsNest » Fri Oct 04, 2019 6:16 pm

In a weird way, this is exactly how Ritchie's mind works......
a good friend of mine who has only recently come out got attacked last week so if I spot any homophobic abuse on Wikipedia I am currently in the mood to kick the perpetrators up the arse and tell them to not let the door hit them on the way out. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:43, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Can never actually do anything just because it's the right thing to do, or policy says it, it always has to have a personal dimension for him.

Hopefully he doesn't let his thirst for revenge get the better of him. What with his history of mental instability.

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Ritchie333

Post by CrowsNest » Fri Oct 04, 2019 6:32 pm

:lol:
Looks like Ritchie has another harassment target in his sights.

Probably trying to ingratiate himself to his new friends at Wikipediocracy, where he is of course posting in a similar vein.....
No sockpuppetry case page, no details on the block. Usual Bbb23 (T-C-L) policy, it would seem.
....which was hardly news to actual critics, but of course all he achieved was an already globally banned user being reported to the WMF for socking around their global ban, and nobody needs that stress, least of all a banned user clearly possessing a thin grip on her mental health.

For good measure, the banned user is also on Wikipediocracy, where she has to suffer Ritchie casually referring to her as "a bit of a crank".

----------

If this poking of Bbb23 is some lame attempt at suicide by cop, he's gonna have to try a lot harder than this. They kept Eric Corbett chained to that radiator for years, remember.

If this is Ritchie teaming up with Wikipediocracy to become a part time critic working the inside angle, it's beyond lame, if not outright dangerous for the innocent people he's gonna embroil in his nonsense.

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Ritchie333

Post by CrowsNest » Mon Oct 07, 2019 2:03 pm

There is a moral panic over COI / paid editing at Wikipedia, which is propogated by Jimbo downwards. People don't look at the content or the edits, they just shout "ZOMG PAID EDITING" with all the critical thinking skills of a Sun reader.
Nice.

(in Brit land, being called a Sun reader is akin to being accused of being a retard).

Does it take much critical thinking to appreciate the logic of a stance based on things being seen to be beyond reproach?

Does it take much critical thinking to appreciate an Administrator like Ritchie, whose own questionable views on conflict of interest are what kicked off this thread, is not in any position to be talking about the probity of anyone's conflicted edits?

For an Administrator who has had such great difficulty abiding by WP:INVOLVED, you can see where Ritchie would be annoyed by beyond reproach being the desired standard.

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Ritchie333

Post by CrowsNest » Mon Oct 07, 2019 5:22 pm

On Lordy, they be dancing around each other like a couple of fairies right now.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/The_Train_Master

Someone throw a punch already. :roll:

Post Reply