Page 1 of 3
WP Admin Floquenbeam
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 3:43 am
by Soham321
.
Re: WP Admin Floquenbeam
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 4:52 am
by Soham321
.
Re: WP Admin Floquenbeam
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 5:18 am
by Soham321
.
Re: WP Admin Floquenbeam seems to be mentally unbalanced
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 7:25 am
by ericbarbour
Oh, if only you could figure out more about both Floq and Rambling Man.....there's an ugly little story here that isn't being told, because their fellow Wikipedians would rather be tortured in a dungeon than to fink on some of their friends. Rambling Man has been up to some really outrageous activities involving protection of paid editors and suchlike.
Re: WP Admin Floquenbeam
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 8:02 pm
by Soham321
.
Re: WP Admin Floquenbeam
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 2:37 am
by Soham321
.
Re: WP Admin Floquenbeam
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 2:40 am
by Soham321
.
Re: WP Admin Floquenbeam
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 2:51 am
by Soham321
.
Re: WP Admin Floquenbeam
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 11:39 am
by Soham321
.
Re: WP Admin Floquenbeam seems to be mentally unbalanced
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 2:20 pm
by Flip Flopped
Soham321 wrote:More drama:
Bishonen: The talk page protection, which is explicitly provided for in the relevant remedy, is an arbitration enforcement action and you may therefore not unilaterally overturn it. (I did not log it because it is not a block, restriction, ban or sanction.) The protection does not prevent an appeal because an appeal may also be submitted per e-mail. Please restore the talk page protection within an hour of your next edit following receipt of this message. Thanks, Sandstein 06:14, 6 March 2017 (UTC)https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... =768849366---
Bishonen is lying low and Sandstein was induced to log his full page protection of TRM's talk page to the AE log. This could head to ArbCom unless Sandstein chickens out.