Cassianto

[CrowsNest]

Every defender of Wikipedia needs to be shown how this foul mouthed bully is allowed to rampage around the site, insult who he pleases, say what he likes to whoever he likes, and literally nothing is done.

In the fucked up world of Wikipedia, where the rules only apply to those fresh off the boat or who never accrue enough life-points, he is allowed to do this simply because he has previously spent many hours writing articles for the website, something he likely never would have achieved had his behaviour been met with appropriate sanctions early on, meaning he either reformed or was banned.

All this guy has been subjected to as a result of his massive personality defects and repeated declarations he has absolutely no intention of changing, is a series of ignored but nonetheless repeated warnings, and a few ineffectual wristslaps in the form of short blocks, many lifted early by the weak or even corrupt Administrators who have tried their very hardest to ensure this sociopath faces zero consequences for his actions.

Despite the website Administration's incredible record of indulging and protecting this manchild's every whim, in complete and total disregard to their own advertised rules of conduct, is he remotely grateful and still productive?......

I'll be about, just to annoy certain people, but that's about it. Wasting my time and money writing articles, only to be trolled and treated like shit, has come to an end. Best wishes to you, John. CassiantoTalk 18:22, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

You would think the defenders of scum like this would see that the only thing appeasement does is see more harm done to Wikipedia in return forever decreased returns, but they do not.

While we can celebrate the fact this sort of thing is what will eventually destroy Wikipedia, there will always be innocent and unwitting victims, so it will forever be an honourable act to work to see some kind of justice is served, on their behalf.

HTD.

[CrowsNest]

Further to the above, look at this......

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... =839562043

What you see there, is Cassianto claiming he requested a three month block from Wikipedia because a close family member was dying, and his private life takes precedence over Wikipedia drama.

For those who don't know, he requested that block just as it looked likely an Arbitration Case with him at its core, was to be accepted. And a month or so before that, he requested a two month block just as it looked like he was about to be subjected to a much longer mandatory block, perhaps even indefinite, as a result of a report to AN/I.

Now, given what we know about Cassianto, what scenario is more likely here? That he really does have a family member who is dying (or perhaps more than one since he left it ambiguous because maybe he remembered he's done it twice), but because he is so addicted to Wikipedia he had to request an enforced absence each time so he could go concentrate on them, and on both occasions it is just an absolute coincidence that he was inches away from wiki-death himself. Or is he reaching a new low and pulling out the time worn dying relative excuse to explain away convenient absences, which miraculously worked in his favour by removing him from the scene, which both ensures he cannot get himself into more trouble, and the gullible Wikipedians who have endless reserves of good faith for assholes like this, are not reminded that he really isn't the kind of guy who ever reflects and changes his approach, he just doubles down and stomps your face harder.

You better believe Cassianto is capable of such a low down dirty move like that. He is scum, personified. His close relatives probably killed themselves long ago, or at least changed their identity, so as to avoid being associated with this sociopath. In terms of a non-work life, Wikipedia is surely all he has. Making over 3,000 edits in the last calender year, even after being blocked for five months of it and claiming to be on strike or whatever, illustrates that. As does his timecard, which shows a classically addicted profile, with sleep the only real downtime.

[CrowsNest]

Just going to record this here.

@Cassianto: for the sake of transparency and because it might help others understand the context of our failure to reply to your emails, may we copy them here? Of course I'll understand if you don't want others to see them. Doug Weller talk 08:46, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

In the unlikely event this ringworm is ever WMF banned for sending threatening or abusive emails, ArbCom won't be able to claim they had no idea he was capable of such a thing.

[CrowsNest]

User DePiep just got shit-canned at AN/I. Indef blocked by Beeblebrox, on the basis he never fronts up to AN/I to explain his actions, and always just sits out time limited blocks. Peanut gallery complaints about his behaviour in the report that led to it, ranged from him not understanding the BRD cycle, childish incivility, lack of empathy, obstinancy and hypocrisy. One Admin related how his attempt to deal with them just "led to me tumbling down a rabbit hole of odd accusations".

Here's why people should never ever give one second of their time to Wikipedia....everything I said above, also applies to the piece of shit known as Cassianto. And they fucking know it. And yet every last Administrator, including that supposed bad ass free thinker Beeblebrox, who was so bad ass in this case he jumped over everyone's head to act, or so says Oswah, is so scared of what Bishonen would do to them, they all look the other way when it comes to Cassianto. And just like the other asshole's asshole of Wikipedia, Eric Corbett, the slimy fucker has the cheek to act like he's the victim, that he's the one who is badly treated on Wikipedia.

They can't have their cake and eat it. Either DePiep has just been wrongly blocked by a cowboy admin, or Cassianto should at this very moment, be wondering what formulation of words will extricate him from an indefinite block.

[CrowsNest]

It is of course not quite right to compare Cassianto to Eric....

If your prepared to act like a dick, be prepared to be called out as one and don't go running to teacher. CassiantoTalk 18:33, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Eric at least had the balls to use the proper curse word when he was trying to convey the exact same sentiment. Just a low-rent knock off. Embarassing.

[CrowsNest]

05:48, 24 May 2018 (diff | hist) . . (-5,006)‎ . . User:Cassianto ‎ (Bored of this shit hole) (current) (Tag: Replaced)

05:49, 24 May 2018 (diff | hist) . . (-11,805)‎ . . User talk:Cassianto ‎ (←Replaced content with '{{retired}}') (current) (Tag: Replaced)

I guess it's a total coincidence that he has recently found out the hard way that he can't start fights over infoboxes while Sandstein has anything to say about it, that wikilawyering that fact isn't much fun even when he's basically only doing it to troll, and trying to go after Sandstein indirectly, like a cowardly little shit, means you have to align yourself with racists. Apparently that is a bridge even this nasty piece of work isn't prepared to cross.

All those people who carried much water for this fucker, hopeful he would return to productive editing, you really need to start learning how to read the mood music. Cassianto was permanently and irretrievably done with Wikipedia months ago. He's said as much, many times, if his editing hadn't already shown you. Go look at his stats, they tell an obvious story regarding how he has evolved, to those who know how to read these things.

So I hope for all your sake that all those people who he has pissed off and insulted in the meantime, while he was coming to terms with his feelings of betrayal and a wasted life, weren't budding FA writers themselves.

Now all you asshole enablers can go defend SchroCat. He's as bad, if not worse in a snide deceitful hypocritical way, than Cass. But you can at least have the excuse that he is still being productive, and is thus, in your warped calculations, worth defending.

[CrowsNest]

What a surprise, Cassianto's boredom with Wikipedia hasn't lasted long. I've had longer holidays in Spain. Who knows, maybe that's where he was, he just wanted to see if anyone would be upset if he really did leave. As seen, nobody was that bothered. And I'm not exxagerating, literally the only message he was left in two weeks, was from someone we must conclude was not a fan, and had probably chosen a username like "CassiantoTouchesKids", or whatever it takes these days to achieve this kind of edit log......

(cur | prev) 22:18, 25 May 2018‎ (Username or IP removed)‎ . . (240 bytes) (+229)‎ . . (→‎Note: new section)

Now returned, Cassianto has clarified he is only semi-retired, and......

I used to write articles.

I was treated like dirt.

I don't anymore

Aw. My heart bleeds. Quite why he thinks nobody is aware this is his current state of mind, is beyond me. He's been telling anyone and everyone for a year or more. Still, he has established he is no longer interested in the main business of writing an encyclopedia, and given he has never shown any interest let alone skill in any of the other necessary functions which fall under "building and maintaining the world's best encyclopedia", we can expect a block for WP:NOTHERE, right? Where is Dennis Brown when you need his particular set of skills?

Showing exactly why he has come back, as if people couldn't guess, his very first edit, before even changing his notices to semi-retired, was to revert Volvlogia, with an insulting edit summary claiming the edits were "absurd". Who was Volvlogia? Only the user who filed the ArbCom case against Cassianto. What was the article? R. Kelly. An article Cassianto has never touched before. What was the edit being reverted? A change to headings which had stood for four days (an eternity on a controversial article).

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... =844095498

I wonder where Bishonen is. She'd interpret this as an act of harassment/baiting/provocation, surely. She certainly would if the roles were reversed. I guess she must be busy with other things. Like wondering why random people randomly hate on her.

It isn't exactly clear what he means by not writing articles anymore. It looks like he wants to leave it open, so he can continue to WP:OWN what he has written up to now (and thus, avoid a NOTHERE block on a technicality).......

18:32, 6 June 2018 (diff | hist) . . (+4)‎ . . Lund's Tower ‎ (wl) (current)

18:31, 6 June 2018 (diff | hist) . . (-18)‎ . . Lund's Tower ‎ (Reverted good faith edits by Cosycoin (talk): Not an improvement . (TW)) (Tag: Undo)

His only other substantive contributions have been to act as Substitute Asshole on a friend's talk page while they were evidently indisposed and not able to act like an Asshole with sufficient rapidity. Once said friend saw Cassianto was back, he of course had a little orgasm. Must be lonely being the only asshole in the slime pond.

It is noted from that silliness, that Cassianto believes that when a user bans you from their talk page, that obviously means a reciprocal ban exists in the opposite direction. I am sure he has always followed that rule (which he just made up, for the record) in his own communications with others. Always.

[CrowsNest]

Three days out of retirement, and he's already crawling right back under his bridge, having simply poured petrol over an already raging forest fire between his best mate SchroCat and literally every women editor on Wikipedia......

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... =845015953

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Black_Friday_(1910)/archive1

[CrowsNest]

Follow up to this post....

https://www.wikipediasucks.co/forum/vie ... 9712#p9712

Cass is properly back on the horse now. Still as dumb as a dumb thing with a sticker on it that says dumb.

He's telling anyone who will listen about how he's been trolled by someone who says really mean things. The sad bastard's reasons for doing so are transparently obvious - to garner sympathy. Maybe he took inspiration from seeing how that pscyho Malik Shabazz was given a free pass to personally attack whoever he liked on the basis he has been harassed and so somehow by some warped logic that transfers an allowance onto him. Hey, I guess you can't argue it doesn't work, because it did, he only went batshit crazy because the community wouldn't completely accede to his wishes and imposed a tiny little 'now, now, don't do it again we really really mean it this time' block for a massive case of taking the absolute piss.

I mean, and I've said this so many times about these professional victim types, if you really were disgusted/horriifed/mortified by what some IP user said to or about you, would you really keep repeating it to others? Keep reliving the trauma in your mind? Keep giving others ideas as to what really winds you up? Keep confirming to your tormentors that they are succeeding? Or would you do as the sensible people do, and just ignore it?

All that he's doing, by saying dumb shit like this....

when it comes to my loved ones, mocking the dead and taking the piss out of mental health, I'm afraid I afford no tolerance

.....is just remind people how high his tolerance level actually is, toward others at least. How he seems to feel absolutely no remorse about how badly he speaks of/about/to his fellow editors. He's still even to this day got the brass balls to be warning other editors about proper decorum.

As a cancer ridden son of a whore from Manchester once said, if you don't want your family/health to be brought into things, don't act like you deserve to have your family/health brought into things

As for this......

It would be handy if we all had a block button that we could press to block interactions with one particular person, much like Twitter has. It would save good people like you a lot of time blocking IP-hopping trolls.

The WMF is looking into this. They identified a need for it not because of IP trolls, but because Wikipedia in its wisdom never seems to want to rid itself of nasty pieces of shit like you.

[Carrite]

It is of course not quite right to compare Cassianto to Eric....

If your prepared to act like a dick, be prepared to be called out as one and don't go running to teacher. CassiantoTalk 18:33, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Eric at least had the balls to use the proper curse word when he was trying to convey the exact same sentiment. Just a low-rent knock off. Embarassing.

I'm more offended by the misuse of "your."

RfB