Judge Bishonen is female, or at least claims to be, but like most people who identify as women on Wikipedia, especially those who have stuck with it long enough to become faces, she is a gender traitor. You do not go looking to her for sympathy or inspiration in the name of the sisterhood, much less common decency, lest you want a good kick in the lady parts and a lecture on how you need to toughen up if you want the privelage of working in her salt mines.
Not for nothing do I call her the Queen Bitch of Wikipedia. She is quite shameless, brazen even, in what she does - you can complain about her outside Wikipedia all you want, she above all of the cultists ascribes to the idea that the only people who matter in Wikipedia, are those in Wikipedia. Qualified obviously by the fact that even if you are in Wikipedia, to her you don't matter unless you show her the proper respect she feels she is due, as one of the local warlords.
In blatant disregard for official protocol, she rather cutely never directly addresses any criticism that some unwise people sometimes direct her way on Wikipedia, as Wikipedians. If initial attempts to brush it aside fail, she will simply double down and dare you to take her to AN/I or even ArbCom. She doesn't do this because she is confident she is in the right, she does it because she knows, having only ever played the political power game that is Wikipedia like a seasoned pro, there's no chance in hell it would result in anything serious for her. As for the lesser result of a warning, well, you might as well be warning the real Queen of England not to break the law, for all the use it would do.
Because of who she is, and what sort of loser is attracted to Wikipedia, she has a motley crew of hangers on and protectees, who will all happily barrak and insult anyone she catches in her web, or even just casts her evil eye toward. Needless to say, if she makes her presence felt in any proceeding against you, especially if in defence of one of her charges, that's you fucked. It won't matter if you have policy on your side or not. In justifying her countless blocks, if needs be she talks a good game as far as morals and right are concerned, but it's all bullshit. Research the cases she gets involved in, see who she does and doesn't block, and it soon becomes clear, she has no principles, no ethics at all.
What marks her out even from other local warlords though, such is the confidence in her untouchable status, is that rather than reflexively always siding with people she is protecting or allied with, if they've done something sufficiently bad or stupid that it would make her look weak by defending it, she'll be quite vicious in her condemnation. Screw gang affiliation, even friendships, she'll slap them down hard, and they'll take that bitch-slapping, because it doesn't pay to do anything else. It isn't like you can go join a more powerful clique, because there are none. It isn't a sign she actually has principles, just supreme confidence in her position, and a message to others to show just how powerful she is.
Amusingly, for all her tough talk and alpha persona, she's actually quite the whiny little bitch, in common with a lot of other alpha male loud mouths in the Admin corps. She hasn't needed to be for a long time, since she is rarely confronted nowadays with the brown end of any Wikipedia sticks. But the world was treated to a fine example of it when Jimmy Wales himself tried one last time to ensure being an Administrator on Wikipedia actually meant a higher standard of behaviour, by blocking her. Boy did she whine. She was still referring to that great injustice years later. Her ultimate victory in that power play to end all power plays, goes a long way to explaining the current state of Wikipedia now.
What really makes me laugh though, is that because she feels so powerful, she simply cannot resist gobbing off about things she knows fuck all about, simply if doing so achieves one of her objectives (typically to do with reinforcing the ideas in the very first paragraph I wrote). This is the pitfall of not having any folks around who feel brave enough to simply ask, 'What the fuck are you on about you scatty cow?'
What inspired me to kick this thread off, was seeing just another example of such.......
What an idiot. She clearly lacks the knowledge to even realise that someone who doesn't know what a scratch code is, will not have any clue what a really strong password even looks like. Her astonishing presumption and general ignorance aside, once done with her anti-WMF shtick (2FA having been sent down from above), she gave away the real reason she doesn't like the idea soon enough.....As an additional security measure, admins and editors with similar permissions can (and should) use Special:Two-factor authentication to prevent account hijacking. Sandstein 21:51, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
I really really do not agree, Sandstein. We've had several cases of admins, including technically savvy admins, who have been in despair because they lost their whatsits — I don't remember what they're called — some magic formulas that you need for your account when you have two-factor authentication — and apparently the magic gets lost every time you get a new phone. Ouch. Eventually, after much stress, these people have been rescued through being able to e-mail people who can vouch for them because they recognize the way they talk. (Hello, Jehochman, hope your account is OK these days.) People who habitually edit from internet cafes or library computers, or who have a mischievous twelve-year-old or a hard-drinking sister-in-law around the house, may possibly need the system, but everybody else had much better instead get a really strong password and not use that password anywhere else. In my opinion. Bishonen | talk 22:57, 3 May 2018 (UTC).
One of the benefits of being Queen Bitch of Wikipedia of course, is the liberty of being allowed to run a whole host of joke accounts. Because they're funny. You know they're funny, because everyone on Wikipedia says so. Just like when everyone agrees the real Queen of England's jokes are hilarious.Blood-chillingly complicated is right, Dlohcierekim. And it sounds to me like the whole log-in operation, otherwise so smooth, gets much more fiddly with 2FA, every time you do it. That's quite a problem for people with a lot of socks![14] Bishonen | talk 23:30, 3 May 2018 (UTC).
Unlike the Queen of England, in truth, I'd say the percentage of people in Wikipedia who would quite like to see Bishonen's head on a pike in the name of the simple rights and dignity of the common people, is close to a third. The place is long overdue that sort of reorganisation. They're all just too scared, or too well off under the current system of feudal patronage, to rise up.
Nobody should feel any guilt, not a single second of remorse, for playing their part in ensuring her eventual downfall, and an as uncomfortable existence as possible in that throne until that is achieved. Because rest assured, if you're the sort of person who reads this forum, if you're the sort of person whose eyes have been opened to the true nature of Wikipedia and the pressing need to fight back, then she wouldn't even piss on you if you were on fire. Worse, she would probably watch you die a horrible death, then piss on your smouldering corpse.