Yes that's it, sorry for being so lazy last night. I accidentally included two links to the song instead of the link to chez Jimbo:
source. (That's your text above)
Here's what I'm referring to:
Tryptofish wrote:There is a very simple reason why I was drawn to editing this page. I have followed the edits of editors who were parties to the GMO ArbCom case (to my knowledge, they have not edited the Clinton page), and I observed that one such editor made an edit to this page that violated the DS, so I came here and corrected it.
source (Nov 19, 2016)
Petrarchan47 first edited the page on 20 August 2016 @ 03:41. It is their only edit to the page to date.
§Tryptofish’s first appearance was on 20 August 2016 @ 17:01.
§ Tryptofish was involved in getting at least three people thrown off that page with the help of Neutrality: me, Anonywiki, and Elvey. Looking back, I remember now that people tried to warn Elvey of what was coming:
Arizona IP wrote:You are indeed headed for a topic (or possibly community) ban with your edits to [[Jill Stein]]; others have been hunted and haunted before you. Be careful.
source
Trypto's contributions to the page included what is in
green below:
Trypto/Wiki wrote:===Science===
The peer-reviewed report Stein co-authored with [[Physicians for a National Health Program]],
In Harm's Way: Toxic Threats to Child Development,
§ received endorsements from six experts on public health.
§.
Stein has said: "For science geeks, you can show yourself if you have any doubt that I too am a science geek."§source
which seem to me a rather jarring register change (even if the initial sentence does contain puff)... we go from a PubMed referenced piece and its back-cover blurbs to an out of context citation that has nothing to do with anything.
Trypto's contributions to the talk page were frequently loaded with threats of imminent DS crackdowns at ArbEnforcement... in other words... he's not as chill a fish as he might appear, at the time he was more of a skilly spinner of DS traps.
Really, of all the diffs in this post the one that cries out to be read in context is the one where he admits hounding in order to dodge charges of bias/COI. He and his buddy Neutrality (& the Snoog, of course) just looked to be fun-house mirroring the Atlantic council so well that a lot of people got confused, I guess...
Now, in fact, JS in the scientific writings I read, doesn't talk much about GMO at all. She does talk a lot about pesticides though (especially in chapter 7 of
In Harm's Way), which brings us back round to Roundup...