Let him be. He is with his own kind now.....
23:29, 29 September 2012 Bongwarrior (talk | contribs) blocked Malleus Fatuorum (talk | contribs) with an expiration time of 1 week (account creation blocked) (Personal attacks or harassment:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?tit ... =515225273)
You're very clearly a dishonest idiot[/b] Bongwarrior, who ought to be desysopped without delay. Malleus Fatuorum 23:36, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
23:45, 29 September 2012 Black Kite (talk | contribs) unblocked Malleus Fatuorum (talk | contribs) (clearly provoked and block length out of line with that which would have been expected from any other editor)
21:38, 21 October 2012 Stephan Schulz (talk | contribs) blocked Malleus Fatuorum (talk | contribs) with an expiration time of 48 hours (account creation blocked, autoblock disabled) (Personal attacks or harassment)
21:43, 21 October 2012 Boing! said Zebedee (talk | contribs) unblocked Malleus Fatuorum (talk | contribs) (Malicious block)
[The block was] quite typical of the dishonesty here. Malleus Fatuorum 21:55, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
Why should any grown up be expected to put up with this kind of shit? Malleus Fatuorum 22:42, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
Just walked in and the whole world is upside down and has lost its mind, collectively. I agree the block was a bad one. I don't know Stephan so I can't speak to his motives, but I'm glad Boing fixed it quickly. Entirely too much drama in every corner of Wikipedia lately. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 22:57, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
Malleus Fatuorum is the ferret fucker Eric Corbett's former username. The circumstances of the first block are absolutely hilarious, and show the extraordinary special treatment Eric got at the hands of corrupt Administrators like Black Kite. It would blow up anybody's irony meter.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... inistrator?
The second block led to this piece of awesomeness, from everyone's favourite example of what a Wikipedia Administrator does not look like....
The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
Wait--you were blocked for insulting MONGO? Well, now, that's a terrible thing. Isn't it. Really, Malleus, tsk tsk. I hope you gave him the FU he deserves.
We're talking about that idiot who wants the credit for driving you off, right? If you did, well done. And who was the fool that thought it was a good use of his little tool to block you? I'm not following things anymore: I looked at the ArbCom shit yesterday or the day before and right now I don't give a good goddamn about this whole project. Take it easy, and please give my regards to Mrs. Malleus. Drmies (talk) 23:20, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
I wonder why Boing did not block that Administrator for calling another Administrator an idiot? I'm going to assume EXTREME COWARDICE unless or until he finds a backbone and explains himself.
I also wonder why Boing called that block malicious, when it seems pretty well reasoned to me.....
I've just blocked User:Malleus Fatuorum for the following edits: [25] [26]. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 21:41, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... =519084029https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... =519088219He's not blocked for insulting me. He's blocked for personally attacking Mongo, and reacting to a warning with a further attack. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 21:53, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
Which was levelled at you. That's not an unimportant distinction. Surely you were aware that warning Malleus was pouring oil on a fire? --Errant (chat!) 22:03, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
Actually, I haven't followed the drama fest. I was aware that MF has a long block log and recurring civility issues, and that there is a WP:TLDR AE case, but I don't think that should excuse him from using at least a very basic level of civility when interacting with other editors. I'm neither block-happy nor particularly fond of overly strict interpretations of WP:CIV. But there is a line, and he crossed it, for no good reason at all. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 22:14, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
If corrupt Wikipedia Administrators like Boing, Black Kite and Dennis Brown seriously want people to believe that
they believe those who "persistently make personal attacks like [X is an idiot] should be excluded from the project", then fuck them, they are going to BURN IN HELL for their brazen hypocrisy. In the meantime, they will find a warm and loving home at Wikipediocracy.
Maybe they can all get together and ask themselves if it was all really worth it, all these corrupt acts designed to totally undermine the entire WP:CIVIL policy, just to protect the nasty little ferret fucker, who repaid their corruption by fucking off anyway, the ungrateful little shit.
People like Boing always have an excuse for why people like Eric Corbett can get away with being nasty little shits, and these excuses are never deployed when it would have helped people like you Graaf.
You will not see Boing! come here and explain any of this, because he is a coward and a scumbag. The dude named himself Boing! for Christ's sake. Certifiable Wikipediot if ever there was one.
Wikipediocracy is the perfect place for all these people to pretend like the they aren't assholes, and Jake is the perfect host to let them get away with it.