....this dude deserves a spot on our wall.If you wish to see TRM using less emotional language then the best way forward is probably to sort the problem at its root - i.e. either fix errors in DYK queues, demonstrate that the matters TRM is highlighting are not errors, and/or get consensus that errors in DYKs appearing on the main page is not a problem (this last will require a wider consensus than just the editors regularly involved with the DYK project, probably an RFC). Thryduulf (talk) 10:47, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
On a point of fact, one thing guaranteed to get TRM using emotional language, is telling him something he has earmarked as an error is not an error. Although I suppose that is why this guy places the burden of proof on the people who are fed up with dealing with the manchild that is TRM, and not TRM himself.
If he is capable of being this blind as far as who does what in this not so complex case of an over-indulged problem user, he is undoubtedly being pretty damn stupid in a whole host of other areas of Wikipedia too.
He's an Administrator, because of course why wouldn't he be? Stupidity is not a disqualifier.
