Dear madam gender desk

Editors, Admins and Bureaucrats blecch!
Post Reply
User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Dear madam gender desk

Post by Graaf Statler » Mon Dec 03, 2018 12:58 pm

Now Graaf is really hard to understand, and my Evil Twin has made some filters so that if he comes here, I will never see the comments.

????? A evil sister who made filters so you can't read Graaf's commons because I am hard to understand?????

So, if you evil sister say, De Graaf is to hard to understand you believe her om haar blauwe ogen? Because of here blue eyes as we say in Dutch? Without checking it out yourself? And you never get the idea, u krijgt noot het idee, he, weet je wat, he, you know what to do, I ask De Graaf himself what he means. And you make make a fair point in your posting, there is never a woman on Sucks and you never get the idea, hé, let me be the first one!
And if you have a technical quoestion about my train project, you never think let me ask it De Graaf himself! Why not madam gender desk if I may ask? We have no filters here to mute woman, so don't be afraid.

Because..... are you afraid I will say you are a woman and woman are not interested in technic? Or they don't understand technical? let me tell you something, that is not true, don't be afraid. Or I will be ruf or impolite to you? Also not true.
I am working the most part of my life with woman in a technical surrounding, and yes, woman are most times attracted to not technical matters. it is the same with homosexual people. They are very attracted to our branch, but not much interested in the technical side. And I am the man in the middle, my work is both technical and artistic.
That is the reason a part of my work is to "translate" the technic site to artistic people, and most times they are woman or male homosexuals. Ik kan het niet helpen, i can't help this, I can't change this, I would make everybody very unhappy if I change it.
So f you have technical questions I would love to answer them to you, so why don't you just come over and ask me? Because I am very used of woman with technical questions. Very good questions, because the lady's need to know what we are doing and we what they are doing. Otherwise everything gaat fout, goes wrong and can even be very dangers.

And I am aware I am writing partly Dutchlish dear gender lady, I am not a professor English like my father. I even wrote years ago on my user page Sir Statler on WP-en a warning. Sorry I am write Dutchlish, have a look there if you don't believe me. But why don't you just ask me if you don't understand what I am writing? Why a filter?

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Dear madam gender desk

Post by Graaf Statler » Tue Dec 04, 2018 6:45 pm

Twofers: Sandstein and AGK

genderdesk wrote:A lawyer? By what standard?

How do you know what he is? Link?

We consider a “lawyer” to be someone with a post-graduate law degree (J.D.) who has passed the bar exam. But I understand Europeans can call themselves lawyers if they are taking law classes.


Not even, dear genderdesk.

Wikipedia-nl wrote:Een jurist(e) of rechtsgeleerde is iemand die het recht bestudeert. Het is geen beschermde titel, hoewel men er in het spraakgebruik vaak mee doelt op iemand die is afgestudeerd in de rechtsgeleerdheid.

Everybody who is interested in law may call himself a jurist, a lawyer. You don't need even to take law classes, i have every right to claim I am a jurist with my three primary school classes in five years. It's Code Napoleon right, peoples right in continental Europe. In Belgium are even leken rechters, judges who went never to law school....

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Dear madam gender desk

Post by Graaf Statler » Tue Dec 04, 2018 6:46 pm

Twofers: Sandstein and AGK

genderdesk wrote:A lawyer? By what standard?

How do you know what he is? Link?

We consider a “lawyer” to be someone with a post-graduate law degree (J.D.) who has passed the bar exam. But I understand Europeans can call themselves lawyers if they are taking law classes.


Not even, dear genderdesk.

Wikipedia-nl wrote:Een jurist(e) of rechtsgeleerde is iemand die het recht bestudeert. Het is geen beschermde titel, hoewel men er in het spraakgebruik vaak mee doelt op iemand die is afgestudeerd in de rechtsgeleerdheid.

Everybody who is interested in law may call himself a jurist, a lawyer. You don't need even to take law classes, i have every right to claim I am a jurist with my three primary school classes in five years. It's Code Napoleon right, peoples right in continental Europe. In Belgium are even leken rechters, judges who never went to law school..
If I want I can open tomorrow (it is now a bit late in Europe) tomorrow my own law firm. Een juridisch advies bureau.

Statler's Juridical advice, specialised in international copyright legalisation.

G.Statler, jurist.

I only need a inschrijving van de kamer van koophandel, what I can get in 10 minutes. Complete legal. And I can do a evening course in three years, and than I have a Bachelor if I want, but I don't need it to call me a jurist and to have a law firm.

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Dear madam gender desk

Post by Graaf Statler » Tue Dec 04, 2018 10:54 pm

Dysklyver wrote:He is a judicial clerk in a mid-level court. In Europe I believe this means he would have to have a JD type degree and could therefore practise as a attorney if he did some more training and passed the bar exam. I can’t link to much without grievously doxxing him, but he more or less says this in his 2010 Arbcom statement.


O, Arthur, there are so many levels, have a look here.. Middle level, higher level, Bachelor, Master. all juristen, laywers.

For the bar you need a master degree and a advocatenopleiding. That is what you need to be a advocaat or in Germany a Gerechtsanwalt.
But for lower courts you don't need to be one, as I told you don't need any special education or some course. A advocaat, Gerechtsanwalt is a jurist, lawyer, but a lawyer is not a advocaat, Gerechtsanwalt.

Very confusing, but if you want to be sure you have a professional in front of you someone has to be a advocaat. But there are also very good lawyers who are not. But if I read this he is doing only some simple administrative work at a lower court.. He will never at the bar, only to drink a beer, he is middle level. In no way at a academic level.

Post Reply