The Kumioko Problem

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm

Re: The Kumioko Problem

Post by Graaf Statler » Sat Sep 21, 2019 7:15 pm

because of Crowsnest constant attacks of anyone new?

Crow has never attacked me.

Crow has never attacked Guido.

Crow has never attacked Any

Gas blew it himself and is a troll farm.

User avatar
Abd
Sucks Warrior
Posts: 742
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:22 pm
Has thanked: 74 times
Been thanked: 41 times

Re: The Kumioko Problem

Post by Abd » Sat Sep 21, 2019 7:26 pm

What I see here is that CrowsNest, very clearly, and Graaf Statler. as well, are violating site policy. Kumioko is not. I am in favor of clear and violated warnings before banning, from those with authority to act. Graaf has pretended here and elsewhere to have authority (probably as a parody of wiki practice) but he only has the right to complain . . . as do all of us. It is not for me to decide what site administration or moderation will decide. I have not complained, other than stating the obvious here, but if I were to comment, with what these users would see as whining, it would be to point out that the behavior of the two users complaining about Kumioko here (and in many posts and also about others besides Kumioko) tends to suppress my even reading this site, so it certainly tends to suppress participation. Fact is one thing, vicious interpretation is another.
Last edited by Abd on Sat Sep 21, 2019 7:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: The Kumioko Problem

Post by CrowsNest » Sat Sep 21, 2019 7:33 pm

Abd wrote:What I see here is that CrowsNest, very clearly, and Graaf Statler are violating site policy. Kumioko is not. I am in favor of clear and violated warnings before banning, from those with authority to act. Graaf has pretended here and elsewhere to have authority (probably as a parody of wiki practice) but he only has the right to complain . . . as do all of us. It is not for me to decide what site administration or moderation will decide. I have not complained, other than stating the obvious here.
Do you wanna maybe be specific, and say, explain which rule I have breached?

Also, if it's not too much trouble, please consider why we have a rule that specifically calls out being like Kumioko as an undesirable thing.

He's here, and he's doing what he has always done. Material breach, no?

User avatar
Abd
Sucks Warrior
Posts: 742
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:22 pm
Has thanked: 74 times
Been thanked: 41 times

Re: The Kumioko Problem

Post by Abd » Sat Sep 21, 2019 7:36 pm

CrowsNest wrote:Do you wanna maybe be specific, and say, explain which rule I have breached?

No. DNFTT. EOT.

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm

Re: The Kumioko Problem

Post by Graaf Statler » Sat Sep 21, 2019 8:01 pm

You are not in the position to make or to interpretate rules, Abd. That is up to the staff.. You are here not even a regulair poster

You guys in general desturbe the goals of this side.

*If you don't like the place what for the hell are you doing here?

*Just leave yourself if you don't like Crow.

*If you guys go on shitting the place and booted out of the blue say never you was not warned.

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: The Kumioko Problem

Post by CrowsNest » Sat Sep 21, 2019 8:05 pm

Abd wrote:
CrowsNest wrote:Do you wanna maybe be specific, and say, explain which rule I have breached?

No. DNFTT. EOT.
All I heard was "No."

I thought you hated people who say dumb shit like this?
The first comment was TLDR so I didn't bother to wade through that nonsense but I'll respond to this one since it's short.
Do you think you of all people will like having someone like that on the forum?

This is literally him saying he expects people to summarize their thoughts in short sound-bites, because he thinks the long form is "nonsense". Didn't say it was simply too long, he called it nonsense.

He's talking nonsense right there, he just doesn't see it, because he's that thick.

He's too thick to even understand what it means when I said "(so it will lack nuance)", therefore he's wasting his time responding only to the short form as if it's going to be an answer to the long.

Be honest Abd. Do you want him around just because he's thick? If he doesn't reply to your posts because they're too long for his tiny brain, or if he gives one of his classic generic ill-thought out "I agree with you [but if we can talk about me for a minute....]" type responses, it will be better for you?

I've broken this post down into bullet points, just for him.

That's right Kumi, you dumb cunt. As far as I'm concerned, you're now guy who needs posts spit up into bite size chunks, because your tiny brain can't deal with anything else. That's what you do to yourself, in your desperation to deal with me your way, you're just that much of a gimp.

User avatar
JuiceBeetle
Sucks Mod
Posts: 676
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2019 8:27 pm
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 40 times

Re: The Kumioko Problem

Post by JuiceBeetle » Sat Sep 21, 2019 8:36 pm

CrowsNest wrote:This is literally him saying he expects people to summarize their thoughts in short sound-bites, because he thinks the long form is "nonsense". Didn't say it was simply too long, he called it nonsense.

Is he obliged to read and answer all the comments? Look at the bright side: at least he wasn't calling you names in his response.
#Bbbgate

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm

Re: The Kumioko Problem

Post by Graaf Statler » Sat Sep 21, 2019 8:53 pm

The bright side should be if Kum understands this is not Wikipedia, not WO, and just accepted the Sucks mores. That should be a bright side, Gas.

After all those years "Kumies" is from my side zero tolerance left. Zero, Gas. No bright sides for me.

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: The Kumioko Problem

Post by CrowsNest » Sat Sep 21, 2019 8:55 pm

Gaslighted wrote:
CrowsNest wrote:This is literally him saying he expects people to summarize their thoughts in short sound-bites, because he thinks the long form is "nonsense". Didn't say it was simply too long, he called it nonsense.

Is he obliged to read and answer all the comments? Look at the bright side: at least he wasn't calling you names in his response.
Calling me names is immaterial.

Is he obliged to read? Yes, he fucking is, if he wants right of reply.

If he wants to be able to claim it is "nonsense" without having even read it, I'm gonna stomp on his head until it is mush, and with all due respect, you better not try and stop me.

Look, I started this thread for your benefit. You need to know what he is like, if you really are going to take the view it is worth him being here. He's going to say whatever he thinks will persuade you he isn't like this, including saying something as obviously false as claiming he is capable of change.

If he could change, why has he been forced to find another home yet again, for the same reason he has been moved on all the other times?

He's a fantasist.

The guy is a fucking menace.

If you take this task on, you better take it on properly. I'll not be amused if you find yourself forced to admit later on that I was right. And I am right.

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm

Re: The Kumioko Problem

Post by Graaf Statler » Sat Sep 21, 2019 9:02 pm

If he wants to be able to claim it is "nonsense" without having even read it, I'm gonna stomp on his head until it is mush, and with all due respect, you better not try and stop me.

This is what I mean with the Sucks mores, Gas. On Dysk his discord I called us the Hells angels of the critical fora. :roll:

Don't try to change that, it is our succes formula.

Post Reply