Page 7 of 7

Re: The Kumioko Review

Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2020 3:25 pm
by Abd
Self-fulfilling prophecy. Posts are moved when they are radically off topic. There was response in that topic by Kumioko, not moved because on-topic (which was Vigilant and then coverage of Vigilant here). Eric Barbour responded and Kumioko's response above was to him, saying it was useless to respond.

I have not deleted any Kumioko posts. I don't think I can, as a mod, delete posts. A moved post can be read, and Eric is admin here, and could do more. Generally, we do not delete posts or content, but we can edit them. I'm not sure of all the details.

If it was useless to respond, then quoting the original was even more useless. I'm formally warning Kumioko, as the next step toward banning for being a PITA. He will say "I don't care," I'm sure, he's said that so many times in so many places, and then, when banned (which always happens, so far, except in one place, the TreeHouse Discord server, where they take in lost puppies -- truly nice people, actually! and consistently so). And we don't care.

I care about the principle that a user who may have been participating in good faith is never banned without warning or opportunity to recover. That is why he is being warned, not because he is supposed to react this way or that. His reactions are his choice.

I do not expect to waste more time explaining this. If I push that ban button, it's out of my hands, no longer up to me. Yay!

Re: The Kumioko Review

Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2020 3:41 pm
by Abd
Kumioko, it appears you have been impersonated on Reddit. I will assume this is impersonation unless you assert ownership.
https://www.reddit.com/user/Kumiokos/. But I would also appreciate it if you would comment here or on the TreeHouse server.

Re: Vigilant!!!

Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2020 9:28 pm
by Kumioko
ericbarbour wrote:
Fri Feb 14, 2020 8:38 am
Kumioko wrote:
Thu Feb 13, 2020 4:33 am
The only thing he's worth is about 2 and a half pages and a lock of the thread.
Normally I would agree. Unfortunately he's got considerable sway over Wikipediocracy's operations. And since he likes to troll wikiinaction (albeit with no success!), he's spreading his crap to other sites. Except this one--because he absolutely cannot take any kind of criticism.
And yet again Abd proves me right. No matter what I post, he and Juicy make sure it gets moved to kumioko corner. So no point commenting here with those 2 clowns.

Re: The Kumioko Review

Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2020 9:30 pm
by Kumioko
Nope, not me you are correct.

As for the previous comments you made. It's not a self fulfilling prophecy, it's how you and Juicy do what you do. No point in commenting here with you two.

Re: The Kumioko Review

Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2020 9:40 pm
by Abd
Kumioko wrote:
Fri Feb 14, 2020 9:30 pm
Nope, not me you are correct.

As for the previous comments you made. It's not a self fulfilling prophecy, it's how you and Juicy do what you do. No point in commenting here with you two.
Thanks for the response on the impersonation, it is appreciated.

Eric had written to you and you wrote that there was no sense in responding because we would delete or move. First of all, I don't delete. I don't think I can, in fact. If you move a response to Eric, even if I moved it in the Outer Darkness, as an admin, he could still read it. Your answer here makes no sense. It is simply not true that I would move a comment just because it was from you. I have moved a few comments because they were off topic, totally useless for any discussion. And that was an example.

The comment was self-contradictory. I.e., if it was useless to make a comment, wh You will y did you make a comment? I know why, Kumioko, it's fairly obvious to everyone, but is it obvious to the one for whom the knowledge could be useful, i.e., you?

I was planning on issuing a warning over that comment, because it's a PITA to be faced with comments needing moving to attempt to keep discussions here on point (and not just bar-room brawls were anything is ordinary). But in recognition of your provision of information -- not you on Reddit -- I'm not doing it. And please, don't tell us again that you don't care.

If you don't care, please prove it by not commenting! You will lose nothing!

On the other hand, if you do care, say so, care, and behave as if you care? Why not?

Re: The Kumioko Review

Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2020 11:29 pm
by Kumioko
Yep, and the reason theres no reason to reply is cause you and Juicy just cut or delete everything. No reason to try to respond.

Re: The Kumioko Review

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 12:18 am
by Abd
Kumioko wrote:
Fri Feb 14, 2020 11:29 pm
Yep, and the reason theres no reason to reply is cause you and Juicy just cut or delete everything. No reason to try to respond.
Kumioko, no "try," do or don't. I just showed how that reason makes no sense. We don't delete, -- certainly I don't -- and you were responding to an admin. Further, you had comment to which Barbour was responding still in place, so we certainly don't move "everything."

We only move useless junk like a claim that it's not worth commenting because it will just be deleted, which, if true, would be reason not to comment at all, unless your intention is to irritate moderators, which, if that is established, is grounds for ban, period.

I don't suspect you are lying, except in a way: you are lying to yourself. That's how it looks to me, and I've seen a lot. You can keep posting irrelevancies and junk here, though, just like Graaf is permitted on the Tree House server, except they have gotten sloppy about that. This is your forum, essentially. Make it interesting and people might even read it. If you make interesting comments elsewhere, you may even be able to link to this in them.

You could make this work, or not. As far as I'm concerned, it's up to you.

Re: The Kumioko Review

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 1:35 pm
by Kumioko
Sure I could make this work, but as long as you and Juicy are the mods it's not going to work. Not with you deleting or cut and pasting all my responses.

5 October 2015

Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2020 7:29 pm
by CMAwatch
Today is the five-year anniversary of his community ban.

There was maybe some discussion page where he was re-blocked for merely replying to an administrator, but I am not sure.