WikipediaSucks.co capture deleted from Wayback! [Evidence]

[CMAwatch]

This page (captured on 2019-11-03) vanished from the Wayback Machine:
http://web.archive.org/web/20191103033457/https://www.wikipediasucks.co/forum/viewforum.php?f=19

Yesterday, it was still available:
http://archive.is/8zTqf

Capture from 2019-11-01 (not deleted yet):
* http://web.archive.org/web/20191101224633/https://www.wikipediasucks.co/forum/viewforum.php?f=19
* http://archive.ph/M99Rr

This is a capture of the Wayback Machine through archive.is of 20191103033457.

Now, it is deleted! Shady, isn't it?

[CMAwatch]

A capture of http://web.archive.org/web/20191103/https://www.wikipediasucks.co/forum/viewforum.php?f=19(date without time) redirected to http://web.archive.org/web/20191105153502/https://www.wikipediasucks.co/forum/viewforum.php?f=19

Evidence: http://archive.is/ACsf1

[Kumioko]

Yeah there's no doubt that the wayback machine and other sites will hide criticism of the WMF and it's sites. It's not a coincidence that wikipedia is one of the top ten websites when you have so many other sites helping them control and mo opolize information.

[JuiceBeetle]

Yeah there's no doubt that the wayback machine and other sites will hide criticism of the WMF and it's sites.

https://web.archive.org/web/20180617064426/http://wikipediocracy.com/category/wikipedia-hoaxes/
https://web.archive.org/web/sitemap/http://wikipediocracy.com/
This is all hidden!

... BULLSHIT

[Kumioko]

Not yet, but they might not have noticed it.

[JuiceBeetle]

Not yet, but they might not have noticed it.

Yeah, it's been only 4.5 years.
There are a lot of articles there...

[ericbarbour]

For completeness, remember that the Archive is "working with the WMF" to help Make Wikipedia Great....

https://www.wikipediasucks.co/forum/vie ... =11&t=1543

Yes, I would not be surprised if someone from the WMF is telling Brewster Kahle's minions to remove specific archived files. You can't use Wayback to learn much about Wikipedia's internal history, so the next step would be to remove criticism. (And WP:DENY, WP:DENY,WP:DENY.)

[CMAwatch]

Yes, I would not be surprised if someone from the WMF is telling Brewster Kahle's minions to remove specific archived files. You can't use Wayback to learn much about Wikipedia's internal history, so the next step would be to remove criticism. (And WP:DENY, WP:DENY,WP:DENY.)

Maybe they have some API access where they don't even have to ask an Internet Archive employee in first place.

[oranges33]

those links aren't deleted though

it takes a lot to be deleted from waybackmachine

I still wish they didn't delete things though, as they'll often delete legal things if they find it'd attract too much negative attention to wayback