Bbb23 admin abuse

[ericbarbour]

I thought I was going crazy when I saw Bbb23 start editing a page that is far outside of his domain and making up things in his edits. He removed entire paragraphs worth of highly-sourced information and reverted changes when challenged.

You're not crazy, he's done similar things before, and other Wikipedia insiders have also pulled dirty tricks. Lots of them.

[Bbb23sucks]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk ... ve_22#Dude

HAHAHA

[Bbb23sucks]

Look at this, an IP user with nearly 500 edits - varied too. Mostly content edits, but also noticeboard dramaz edits too. They were even praised several times by different users (rare for even users with 1,000 edits). Later the IP decided to close a question that had been answered. What was Bbb23's response? Blocked for a month of course!

[Bbb23sucks]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk ... ForTesting

Admin RoySmith tried to create a test account, but it was blocked by Bbb23 because Bbb23 is an absolute idiot. Even other admins can't stand him.

[Bbb23sucks]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk ... ked_editor

In all Wikimedia projects, spaces and events, behaviour will be founded in respect, civility, collegiality, solidarity and good citizenship. This applies to all contributors and participants in their interaction with all contributors and participants, without expectations based on age, mental or physical abilities, physical appearance, national, religious, ethnic and cultural background, caste, social class, language fluency, sexual orientation, gender identity, sex or career field. Nor will we make exceptions based on standing, skills or accomplishments in the Wikimedia projects or movement.

You have been blocked indefinitely for WP:CIR, inadequate English skills.

Shows how "universal" the code really is.

[rubricatedseedpod]

Is there a party line on the relationship between UCoC and CIR, or are they just letting the blatant contradiction go unexplained?

[Bbb23sucks]

[…] or are they just letting the blatant contradiction go unexplained?

As far as I know, yes.

[rubricatedseedpod]

Brilliant! That way, if you don't like someone, you always have a way to decide that they did the wrong thing, regardless of which approach they chose.

[Bbb23Hater]

7z4yk5.gif (2.69 MiB) Viewed 3564 times

[ericbarbour]

Dunno, I just think it's funny that Bbb has such a talent for enraging people. Suspect that is a part of why the insiders put up with his abuses--they sit around and chortle as some nobody gets banned and goes to the forums to throw semi-coherent fits. Clearly doing it partly to generate "lulz". (Tell me again that Wikipedia is "better" than 4chan or KiwiFarms.)

Have an example from five years ago, in this very thread.