Wikipedia Sucks!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... call/Bbb23
After my unpleasant dealings with Bbb23 over the years I am not going to shed a tear. I'm glad he's gone. I wish the AN thread wasnt locked, he'd probably pick up a block. some people are too nice smh smh

Let's not forget the AN discussion. A variety of well-known shitbirds showed up to twist and shout, usually in Bbb's favor. They all know damn well what a rotten bastard he's been for 13 years. Yet he still obtains "special treatment" as a "special person".

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... dmin_Bbb23

I continue to suspect he is Tim Hardcastle. It was discussed in great detail on WPO for years. He had his checkuser rights pulled in 2020 for similar reasons. They rarely ever mention THAT little fact.

It'd like a dream come true for Bbb23sucks/OvskMendov1 but ultimately it's just a symptom of a larger problem.

One of many idiotic blocks mentioned in the Wiki threads.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk ... ember_2022

Blocked for creating this chart in own userspace.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... 1129546185

boredbird wrote: ↑

Sat Jun 07, 2025 6:12 am

One of many idiotic blocks mentioned in the Wiki threads.

Admins probably abuse the block tool far more often than they misuse it. At any rate, the real idiocy comes afterward:

Jackass 1 wrote: "You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia."

Jackass 2 wrote: I am indeed here to build an encyclopedia.

Jackass 3 wrote: I'm going to remove the block because I think you are here to help us build this encyclopedia.

Archer wrote: ↑

Sun Jun 08, 2025 5:41 pm

boredbird wrote: ↑

Sat Jun 07, 2025 6:12 am

One of many idiotic blocks mentioned in the Wiki threads.

Admins probably abuse the block tool far more often than they misuse it. At any rate, the real idiocy comes afterward:

Jackass 1 wrote: "You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia."

Jackass 2 wrote: I am indeed here to build an encyclopedia.

Jackass 3 wrote: I'm going to remove the block because I think you are here to help us build this encyclopedia.

Jackass 1&3 wrote: Is this your first account? Your first edits are very advanced for a noob

At least the jackasses didn’t block him/her again but the user left anyway. Well done, jackasses.

I did appreciate when he finally blocked Sagecandor and, eventually, Cirt -- after one of his doubles wrote an entry reviewing The Big Butt Book.

badmachine wrote: ↑

Sun Jun 08, 2025 5:56 pm

At least the jackasses didn’t block him/her again but the user left anyway. Well done, jackasses.

I suspect there's more to the story in this case. I've never seen admins accept an appeal without the appellant's grovelling admission of guilt.

Bbb posted a comment at the bottom of the AN squabble (one of the most MORONIC I've ever seen, and I've seen a lot) on June 6. On June 9 he censored his talkpage by removing comments from the people asking for his removal. Since then, no edits or actions. He knows his "mop" is hanging by a very fine thread. But it will take weeks for action is taken, assuming ANY action is ever taken. The backchannels are unquestionably burning up right now.

sashi wrote: ↑

Mon Jun 09, 2025 2:55 am

I did appreciate when he finally blocked Sagecandor and, eventually, Cirt -- after one of his doubles wrote an entry reviewing The Big Butt Book.

This ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dian_Hanson ) is all that is left of any reference to The Big Butt Book. There is a dead link on the Diane Hanson BLP. And thus another Swiss cheese hole in en.Wikipedia is born.