From Meta:
Unsurprisingly, that's not something the Wikipedia community considers to be a sign he probably shouldn't be trusted to be an Administrator at all anymore.On the recommendation of the Ombuds Commission, the Trust & Safety Team of the Wikimedia Foundation, on direction of the General Counsel, has revoked access of User:Bbb23 to non-public information or tools that may be used to access non-public information, previously granted under the NDA. This revocation is permanent. --WMFOffice (talk) 11:48, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
It is curious though, as to why, as an Administrator, he is still being allowed to be active in the area of SPI. The exact place where he might be in contact with users who might be tempted to share private data with him. Or indeed, where he might still have private data on users that he has retained on his personal devices, which he can continue to use to place the sort of blocks which really should only be placed by people still trusted with private data.
Enter Beeblebrox. When asked why ArbCom hasn't sought fit to topic ban him from SPI, he rather ridiculously claimed, it's not a matter for them. Apparently, even though the community isn't privy to ANY of the relevant information, the lazy piece of asscrust Beeblebrox wants to place all of the burden of proving there is a potential problem that a topic ban solves, on the community.
https://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewto ... 35#p291135
Typical.
As is the fact the Wikipedia community has to hear this not from a Wikipedia page, but from the Wikipediocracy forum.