Beeblebrox admits he's just a pointless pest on Commons

Evil admin for many years, tossed out in 2020, now infesting Wikipediocracy
Post Reply
User avatar
Jake Is A Sellout
Sucks Warrior
Posts: 717
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2021 1:01 am
Been thanked: 113 times

Beeblebrox admits he's just a pointless pest on Commons

Post by Jake Is A Sellout » Mon Sep 13, 2021 12:53 pm

What a wanker.

https://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewto ... 56#p295091

Here he is yet again unburdeinng his sob story to the asshats of Wikipediocracy. Who of course are doing everything they can to soothe him.
I do what I can on a case-by-case basis at Commons, but I have little to no hope of accomplishing any systemic changes there anytime soon so I don't really try.
What a hero, eh?

Seems like a waste of time to me. Unless your goal is to just harass hard working Commons editors, on some never ending but quite ridiculous attempt to convince anyone not already devoted to English Wikipedia that somehow English Wikipedia is the superior project. He is the living proof it isn't. An Arbitration Committee Member who is unashamedly, a toxic asshole.

Systemic change is easy to achieve on Commons, unburdened as they are by the bullshit bureaucracy of Wikipedia. You just have to persuade them what you are proposing is of benefit to Commons. Wankers like Beeblebrox who come to them with a view that if an image isn't of use to Wikipedia, it can probably be deleted on Commons, are QUITE RIGHTLY ignored as the dirty little trolls they are.

Commons isn't Wikipedia. They do what you're supposd to do with trolls, ignore them. They've got work to do, they dont have the time to waste arguing over the sort of pointless bullshit that will go nowhere that Wikipedia editors always seem to have.

No comment yet from Beeblebrox or his Wikipediocracy therapists as to why even in that most recent example of him trying to participate there, included falsely claiming an editor had uploaded a bunch of copyright violations, and then not even having the human decency to apologise when he realized his mistake. A mistake a fucking NOVICE Commons editor wouldn't have made.

I will REPEAT, I am only even talking about him because Beeblebrox isn't just an ordinary Wikipedia editor, where people like Davey show just how straight up retarded and tempestuous you can be, and still never get blocked indefinitely. I'm lighting up Beeblebrox because he's on the Arbitration Committee.

Over 400 Wikipedia editors think he's hot shit, a role model. And I don't buy the oft floated idea that a large number of people are voting for him solely because that will somehow destroy Wikipedia from within.

Maybe Commons needs a systemic change in the field of making sure assholes like Beeblebrox can't just get away with being assholes? Probably already impossible, such is the creeping influence of the vermin on Wikipedia. No surprise to see Davey piping up recently to say he sees nothing wrong with Beeblebrox making a personal attack on Fae. He quite rightly says he has done worse, and where did he learn that being such a piece of filth is tolerable? From none other than Wikipedia, under the glorious example of feces like Beeblebrox.

They are of course prevented in that exercise of local standards when Stewards arrive out of nowhere to globally block Commons editors who are posing a problem for Beeblebrox.

Time for a revolution, no? Spanish Wikipedia did it, so why not Commons?

I mean, I genuinely don't understand people who don't look at Beeblebrox and think there's a guy who needs to have a bad accident with a snow blower. Not right in the head, imho.

Come on Jake, explain it for us. Help us figure out why you're so reluctant to speak truth to this power?

We're listening.

User avatar
Bbb23sucks
Sucker
Posts: 1337
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2023 9:08 am
Location: The Astral Plane
Has thanked: 1255 times
Been thanked: 263 times

Re: Beeblebrox admits he's just a pointless pest on Commons

Post by Bbb23sucks » Thu Nov 23, 2023 6:30 pm

https://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewto ... 82#p335286
Beeblebrox wrote: I suspect most even semi-active Commons users will probably not even notice anything different. Pretty sure I got that user right without even asking for it.
Does he not realize that he only got special treatment because he's a WP admin?
"Globally banned" since September 5, 2023 for exposing harassment.

Email: wikipediasucks@disroot.org

Petition to ban Bbb23Wikipedia AlternativeDonate to help French strikers

User avatar
ChaosMeRee
Sucker
Posts: 225
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2023 11:59 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 152 times

Re: Beeblebrox admits he's just a pointless pest on Commons

Post by ChaosMeRee » Fri Nov 24, 2023 2:37 am

Typical Beeblebrox. Granting autopatrolled to people without them even asking for it is of course a thing on English Wikipedia. Totally routine. And of course, the beneficiaries do not notice it. That's a feature, not a bug. Stupid cunt.

His hatred of Commons sees him trying to make this sound like they don't know what they're doing when it happens over there. INeverCry clearly did their job and granted Beeblebrox the right because he is a "trusted user". Is he saying he cannot be trusted? I mean, he clearly can't be when it comes to respecting sister projects, but he would never actually admit it. Coward that he is.

Nothing more to be said about it. But of course, Beeblebrox carries on talking. He is hanging out with his mates, sharing. Just another sad lonely bastard on the internet. He must have completely forgotten all about that super important work project that is in its rush period that he was telling everyone about only last week. That totally not made up work project.

I bet he's done nothing all week except sit in his pants eating Cheetos and talking Wikipedia all day. Nothing wrong with that, as long as you're smart enough to realise that you can now earn $75 an hour doing that. I don't think Beeblebrox is that smart.

Still, it has value. Now we know that when Beeblebrox is clearing the backlog at PERM, he's not doing it to help Wikipedia run more smoothly. He's doing it to "feel good". Sad bastard.

P.S., if you actually do feel bad when deleting and blocking, you're probably doing it wrong.

Fuckwit.

Post Reply