Has Wikipedia gone woke? (Chris Troutman blocked for sexis

User avatar
gnngl
Sucks
Posts: 34
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2023 12:00 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 16 times

Re: Has Wikipedia gone woke? (Chris Troutman blocked for sexis

Post by gnngl » Wed May 01, 2024 5:14 am

Kraken wrote:
Tue Apr 30, 2024 5:52 pm
this is the second most stupid thing you've written

User avatar
Kraken
Sucks Fan
Posts: 209
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2024 2:42 am
Been thanked: 135 times

Re: Has Wikipedia gone woke? (Chris Troutman blocked for sexis

Post by Kraken » Wed May 01, 2024 9:51 am

The AN/I report has now been closed as a "kindness" to Chris.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... s_Troutman

Sure.

As anyone can see, the thread was closed before it became even more obvious what motivated this block.

And before Beeblebrox could be challenged over why he happily places indefinite punishment blocks on powerless people like Chris for an alleged long history of recidivism in the field of hate crimes, but is nowhere to be seen when the likes of the extremely popular former Admin and Bureaucrat The Rambling Man is in full flow. Molly White was blocking him way back in 2017, but not indefenite. Sandstein tried to send a clear message with a one month block also in 2017, but TRM lawyered up and beat the wrap on a technicality. I think everyone who knows Beeblebrox, knows who he feels more of an affinity with in that particular battle of ideas.

Beeblebrox hides who he is IRL because he's a white defence contractor living in Alaska who views the Alaskan native peoples with the contempt you would expect from an American Imperialist. It's no effort for him to temporarily grow a conscience and punch down on a little person in a very visible way. It all helps his primary interest - making it seem he was the real victim when he found fame as the first person ever to be suspended by ArbCom. For being untrustworthy. As in, the kind of person who would lie about why they placed a block.

It's also been closed before the vicious and malicious behaviour of the Wikipedia editors who are proactively policing Wikipedia as trans activists and their achingly woke allies, became too obvious.

People so fucking deranged they're not happy with having achieved an indefinite block of an editor with 50,000 edit on the rather ludicrous claim his offending was somehow just overlooked all these years - the very same project that was repeatedly taking direct action against TRM, the evidence for which you don't have to go hunting for in talk page archives - they have to resort to misquoting Chris to plant the seed that now he is blocked the community should be on ALERT for his return as a sock puppet.

And he obviously would, because a convicted sexist who refused to recent before the Communist Terror Corps, would have no respect for any of Wikipedia's behavioural rules would they?
There are few behavioral rules this user seems to have respect for. ...... When it comes to misogyny, transphobia, and misanthropy, we can call a spade a spade.
Aw bless. If people are looking for actual examples of Wikipedia sexists who do indeed, when the time comes and they're met with an indefinite block, choose to sock to get around it, you need look no further than Eric Corbett. And as I said, people like that very much aren't treated the way Chris has been. Two quick blocks and you're done. And most definitely not two blocks for the same fucking comment already dealt with. The very idea this would have stood for Eric, is insane.

In full view of the likes of Beeblebrox, to deal with Eric Corbett, it took years of actual, literal blocks and official registered warnings to get there. And his friends were with him all the way. Defending, obstructing, lawyering. Some still are. They're all still powerful Wikipedians. People Beeblebrox would never dare block for stating a view and then not recanting it, because he's a coward.

Misquoting someone in such a disgusting way for such disgusting ends is of course a major violation of behavioural policy. But who would ever block a trans activist editor for that? Beeblebrox? Molly White?

Don't make me laugh.

And who is it making these comments? Is it a fine upstanding member of the community? it's Hydrangeans. Formerly P-Makato. A user who changed their name the moment they were subjected to scrutiny by Wikipediocracy. Presumably now it is known Hydrangeans is not just a COI editor they're a trans activist editor, they will be left alone. Wikipediocracy has their priorities. Woke first, corruption second.

Chris is never coming back as a productive editor, either openly or as a clandestine, because you've all shown your true colours. The rules and your pathetic outrage applies only to the weak and powerless. And your capacity to lie and gaslight is endless.

He might come back as a "long term abuser". Someone dedicated to trolling you for years and years until you just can't take it and kill yourselves, as due punishment for your crimes. And if he doesn't, your behaviour is sufficiently obviously unjust there are many who will do so on his behalf.

A few more years of this being how you go about showing your virtues, and I dare say there might not be any Wikipedia editors left. It's already having an effect on your Administrators and the few who reside above them. The very people you rely on to protect you from the face ripping heart stomping "LTAs", are losing the will to continue.

Some are going full Section 8.

And long may it continue.

User avatar
Kraken
Sucks Fan
Posts: 209
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2024 2:42 am
Been thanked: 135 times

Re: Has Wikipedia gone woke? (Chris Troutman blocked for sexis

Post by Kraken » Sat May 04, 2024 4:49 pm

Chris has unsurprisingly not filed an appeal.

Former Arbitrator Molly White hasn't been challenged on where the fuck she gets off lecturing Chris about treating other editors with a modicum of respect given now she acted in this whole matter.

Disgraced Arbitrator Beeblebrox hasn't been challenged on where the fuck he gets off pretending this block isn't about Chris' failure to recant for something he was already blocked for, given that piece of shit will tell anyone who listens how unfair his suspension from ArbCom was, and would still be fighting his doomed appeal even now if they let him.

Casting a very long shadow over this whole affair is the silence of Arbitrator Firelfy, who challenged Chris about the original "quite obviously not ... appropriate" comment, and who we can take assume from their lack of a follow up was satisfied with what he had achieved in response from Chris.

Nobody has questioned how in the very same week the many times blocked many times Arbitrated many times officially sanctioned with umpteen pages of official paperwork filed and logged famously -ist and -obic defrocked Admin disgraced Bureucrat The Rambling Man returned to Wikipedia from his not a break break, that Chris went from an editor in good standing to an indefinite block in very short order.

Lightening quick you might say. With the speed and vengeance of a woman scorned. Something you would totally expect from a matter that was prosecuted by Molly with high emotion and rank sarcasm. Which nobody called her on.

An act that was not only unusual in or itself for It's tone and soeed, it now sits in stark contrast to the months long dry bureaucratic proceedings deployed against TRM. Where the only emotion was coming from the odious man caught bang to rights. That's the The Rambling Man, who in the fine tradition of Eric Corbett et al, never once acknowledged much less apologised for their behaviour. Indeed they often Wikilawyered the shit out of disciplinary matters, turning the gaslighting of the community into an art form.

All of that is revealed from Chris's own talk page, block log and recent edits. No detailed research needed. Just a working knowledge of who these bastards are.

Nobody has even raised the matter that this was yet another time Administrator Doug Weller has turned up at someone's talk page looking to stir the pot over ancient history in ways that very do look like he is subjecting editors without his power to Kafkaesque trials. Applying absurd unilaterally invented standards that he himself has often failed to meet in spectacular ways, and only gets away with because almost everyone is scared of that psycho Bishonen. Almost everyone. She can't do shit to people she doesn't have any leverage over. And there are signs she can be got at. It's taken years to find her weakness, but it's there. It's been seen. Ironically because Doug is who he is. A very stupid man.

This shit cannot go unanswered. This is a step beyond the usual hypocrisy of Wikipedia. The usual assholery. The usual arrogance. The usual exploitation.

Someone has to fucking pay for this.

And I mean pay. Not the pathetic accountability that pussy Vigilant thinks is accountability.

I mean real accountability.

This is most fucking definitely about the principle. The usual newbie cannon fodder aside, if you're sitting around for a perfect victim before you unleash hell on Wikipedia for crimes like this, you will be waiting a very long time indeed. They're corrupt, they're not stupid.

Stop me if you think you can.

Make me forget if you think you can.

Shut me up if you think you can.

You already know you can't.

User avatar
Kraken
Sucks Fan
Posts: 209
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2024 2:42 am
Been thanked: 135 times

Re: Has Wikipedia gone woke? (Chris Troutman blocked for sexis

Post by Kraken » Thu May 09, 2024 10:27 am

Just in case anyone was in any doubt Molly White is untouchable on Wikipediocracy.....

https://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewto ... 21&t=13530

Get a room, Zoloft. :oops:

HEY VIGILANT

Was I really blocked from Wikipediocracy for making the daughter-wife Uncel Zoloft never had feel sad?

Feel all the saaaaad feeeeeeewinggsss?

Question her standing to talk about user conduct or the quality of Wikipedia content?

Ask where the fuck she gets off being so virtuous, from a position of such low morals?

Once you strip away the myths and look at the facts. The evidence.

Most of it not even hidden under rocks such that you would need to be an intrepid investigator to find it, but lying in plain sight.

Awww.

You useless cunt.

You docile, knows his place, lost his balls, couldn't criticise Wikipedia/ns even if he tried and Zoloft gave him permission, worm ridden little house pet.

I bet you'll STILL be a loyal little lap dog even if Sucks posts a video of Zoloft standing behind Molly sniffing her hair at the North American WikiConference. He said it. You saw it. "I want to mingle".

We can do that. We have done it. Your confederates only joke about it.

User avatar
boredbird
Sucks Mod
Posts: 546
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2017 3:24 am
Has thanked: 681 times
Been thanked: 323 times

Re: Has Wikipedia gone woke? (Chris Troutman blocked for sexis

Post by boredbird » Thu May 09, 2024 7:00 pm

No doubt they are starstruck by her presence on their membership rolls, never mind that she''s never contributed anything there or on Wikipedia of any value. Why would she write for them when she can write for Bloomberg etc.? There are the lovestruck fans who keep this low-budge media scheme going and they lack the self-consciousness to understand why they're doing what they're doing.

Hello white-knighting. Sometimes older men are the biggest suckers of all.

Wow, women in STEM, awesome! It was getting kinda lonely in the lab, alone with the chipmunks. A breath of fresh air.

So transparent.

User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 4687
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Location: The ass-tral plane
Has thanked: 1185 times
Been thanked: 1883 times

Re: Has Wikipedia gone woke? (Chris Troutman blocked for sexis

Post by ericbarbour » Fri May 10, 2024 6:26 am

Kraken wrote:
Thu May 09, 2024 10:27 am
You useless cunt.

You docile, knows his place, lost his balls, couldn't criticise Wikipedia/ns even if he tried and Zoloft gave him permission, worm ridden little house pet.
heh

Post Reply