Research Article: Wikipedia’s Intentional Distortion of the History of the Holocaust

[Bbb23sucks]

So, have the historical distortions been removed from or corrected in the Polish Holocaust articles?

To my understanding, no.

[ericbarbour]

So, have the historical distortions been removed from or corrected in the Polish Holocaust articles?

See for yourself:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warsaw_concentration_camp

The camp played a comparatively minor role in the Holocaust and thus seldom appears in mainstream historiography.[1][5] However, it has been at the centre of a conspiracy theory, first promoted by Maria Trzcińska, a Polish judge who served for 22 years as a member of the Chief Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation. The theory, refuted by mainstream historians, contends that KL Warschau was an extermination camp operating a giant gas chamber inside a tunnel near Warszawa Zachodnia railroad station and that 200,000 mainly non-Jewish Poles were gassed there.[4]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warsaw_co ... camp_story

As usual, the article got longer--not necessarily better. Normally something like this, with even the slightest whiff of "Holocaust revisionism", would have attracted Jewish extremists like Icewhiz in great numbers. Not this time.

During 2021 and 2022 it was massively revised by Szmenderowiecki. Who is a total OCD maniac about Polish trivia, and Maurice Duplessis. I've never seen this username before in any of the past EEML/Piotrus/Marek/etc. squabbles. Must be a fresh new sockpuppet belonging to someone we have seen before. HanzoHattori, Icewhiz, Piotrus etc. were pushed into the background as editors. Almost nothing was done to the article since the story broke in February of this year. It's "Wiki-Radioactive".

[Bbb23sucks]

New drama involving sashi too: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... privileges

[boredbird]

New drama involving sashi too: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... privileges

Amazing that Piotrus of all people is still invited to judge these matters.

[Bbb23sucks]

New drama involving sashi too: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... privileges

Amazing that Piotrus of all people is still invited to judge these matters.

That was my first thought too!

[ericbarbour]

New drama involving sashi too: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... privileges

Amazing that Piotrus of all people is still invited to judge these matters.

AND he has the fucking NERVE to refer to a Wikipediocracy thread as a "reason" to restrict Sashi. A very long, stupid thread.

That really tears it: not only is Piotrus a greasy little twitching nerd, WPO is now an "approved off-wiki channel for discussion". Meaning that anything you post there will be held against you.

PS: any bets that GizzyCatBella/Jacurek is a sockpuppet or "fellow traveler", as suggested on WPO, under Icewhiz's control? I'm thinking 51 to 49. Doing a good job of hiding it--except in this area.

Lunatics, all of them.

[boredbird]

PS: any bets that GizzyCatBella/Jacurek is a sockpuppet or "fellow traveler", as suggested on WPO, under Icewhiz's control? I'm thinking 51 to 49. Doing a good job of hiding it--except in this area.

Zero chance. It is a sock of Jacurek as suggested and Piotrus and Marek were fine with it. If they are saying they think it's Icewhiz they're just lying.

[Bbb23sucks]

PS: any bets that GizzyCatBella/Jacurek is a sockpuppet or "fellow traveler", as suggested on WPO, under Icewhiz's control? I'm thinking 51 to 49. Doing a good job of hiding it--except in this area.

Zero chance. It is a sock of Jacurek as suggested and Piotrus and Marek were fine with it. If they are saying they think it's Icewhiz they're just lying.

The bird is right.

[ericbarbour]

The bird is right.

Probably so, but as usual: we will never know what the hell is actually going on here. The original "Wikipediametric" arbitration was "settled" in December 2009. Yet nothing changed. Piotrus should have been banned PERMANENTLY. But noooo, he was banned for 3 months and resigned his admin power. Tried an RFA in 2013 and failed. Tried another RFA in 2014 (with Cirt nominating him!) and failed again. Dragged to Arbcom repeatedly since 2006. The guy is literal poison. So why is he still "tolerated"?

[Bbb23sucks]

Tried an RFA in 2013 and failed.

The user who nominated has some "coincidental" interests. Wanna bet that he's a meatpuppet?

The guy is literal poison. So why is he still "tolerated"?

Poison likes poison.