"Gays Against Groomers" vs Wikipedia

Post Reply
User avatar
Bbb23sucks
Sucker
Posts: 1351
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2023 9:08 am
Location: The Astral Plane
Has thanked: 1285 times
Been thanked: 274 times

"Gays Against Groomers" vs Wikipedia

Post by Bbb23sucks » Mon Aug 28, 2023 4:18 am

It seems that some anti-trans group has gotten into a beef with Wikipedia: https://www.radar.gaysagainstgroomers.c ... pedia-page

The talk page is a goldmine: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Gays ... t_Groomers

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... &limit=500

At first, there doesn't seem to be much fighting. Scroll back and you'll find all of our favorite patrollers and admins.
Last edited by Bbb23sucks on Sun Sep 24, 2023 1:57 am, edited 7 times in total.
"Globally banned" since September 5, 2023 for exposing harassment.

User avatar
badmachine
Sucker
Posts: 459
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:55 am
Has thanked: 557 times
Been thanked: 261 times
Contact:

Re: "Gays Against Groomers" vs Wikipedia

Post by badmachine » Mon Aug 28, 2023 5:14 pm

the gays shouldve declared victory and closed the gay orgs when we got the right to marry. now the orgs (like GLAAD, HRC, PFLAG, etc) are infiltrated with trannies. in addition to pushing mutilation, these orgs now promote abortion, which isnt traditionally a gay rights issue, e.g.: GLAAD, HRC, and PFLAG

most galling to me personally is the use of PEPFAR for abortions. the goal of PEPFAR was to save lives, not destroy the most vulnerable lives.

User avatar
boredbird
Sucks Mod
Posts: 515
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2017 3:24 am
Has thanked: 657 times
Been thanked: 301 times

Re: "Gays Against Groomers" vs Wikipedia

Post by boredbird » Mon Aug 28, 2023 5:29 pm

If gays are really fighting trans that makes nearly all editors WP:INVOLVED.

Tamzin says his actual job is to target schools across the country and recruit more trans.

Here's his boyfriend TheresNoTime locking the article.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... t+Groomers

User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 4626
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Location: The ass-tral plane
Has thanked: 1158 times
Been thanked: 1848 times

Re: "Gays Against Groomers" vs Wikipedia

Post by ericbarbour » Tue Aug 29, 2023 10:55 pm

Bbb23sucks wrote:
Mon Aug 28, 2023 4:18 am
The talk page is a goldmine
AAAAGGGGHHHHHHH

Even the worst arbitrations weren't as disgusting (or as LONG and UNREADABLE) as this "argument". And what the hell is Dronebogus doing in there? Why does that smug little patroller "care" so much about gay rights?

TheTranarchist is shaping up to be one of their most toxic content grinders. Does nothing but fight with people over transgender and LGBTQ content since 2021. Dollar sez she'll be RFA nominated by Tamzin someday.

Funny how the people doing the most shrieking about authoritarianism are also the most prone to trying their OWN authoritarian political tricks and abuse, eh? Especially on Wikipedia.
Last edited by ericbarbour on Tue Aug 29, 2023 11:07 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Bbb23sucks
Sucker
Posts: 1351
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2023 9:08 am
Location: The Astral Plane
Has thanked: 1285 times
Been thanked: 274 times

Re: "Gays Against Groomers" vs Wikipedia

Post by Bbb23sucks » Tue Aug 29, 2023 11:21 pm

ericbarbour wrote:
Tue Aug 29, 2023 10:55 pm
Even the worst arbitrations weren't as disgusting (or as LONG and UNREADABLE) as this "argument". And what the hell is Dronebogus doing in there? Why does that smug little patroller "care" so much about gay rights?
"Trans rights" actually. Still, I don't know why.

Reminds of a meme I saw that this generation is the first to think that believing what the establishment believes (neoliberal capitalism, "progressive" imperialism, and milquetoast progressive social politics) is "radical".
"Globally banned" since September 5, 2023 for exposing harassment.

Post Reply