It seems that some anti-trans group has gotten into a beef with Wikipedia: https://www.radar.gaysagainstgroomers.c ... pedia-page
The talk page is a goldmine: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Gays ... t_Groomers
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... &limit=500
At first, there doesn't seem to be much fighting. Scroll back and you'll find all of our favorite patrollers and admins.
"Gays Against Groomers" vs Wikipedia
-
- Sucker
- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2023 9:08 am
- Location: The Astral Plane
- Has thanked: 1423 times
- Been thanked: 285 times
"Gays Against Groomers" vs Wikipedia
Last edited by Bbb23sucks on Sun Sep 24, 2023 1:57 am, edited 7 times in total.
"Globally banned" since September 5, 2023 for exposing harassment.
-
- Sucker
- Posts: 468
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:55 am
- Has thanked: 594 times
- Been thanked: 269 times
- Contact:
Re: "Gays Against Groomers" vs Wikipedia
the gays shouldve declared victory and closed the gay orgs when we got the right to marry. now the orgs (like GLAAD, HRC, PFLAG, etc) are infiltrated with trannies. in addition to pushing mutilation, these orgs now promote abortion, which isnt traditionally a gay rights issue, e.g.: GLAAD, HRC, and PFLAG
most galling to me personally is the use of PEPFAR for abortions. the goal of PEPFAR was to save lives, not destroy the most vulnerable lives.
most galling to me personally is the use of PEPFAR for abortions. the goal of PEPFAR was to save lives, not destroy the most vulnerable lives.
-
- Sucks Mod
- Posts: 546
- Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2017 3:24 am
- Has thanked: 681 times
- Been thanked: 323 times
Re: "Gays Against Groomers" vs Wikipedia
If gays are really fighting trans that makes nearly all editors WP:INVOLVED.
Tamzin says his actual job is to target schools across the country and recruit more trans.
Here's his boyfriend TheresNoTime locking the article.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... t+Groomers
Tamzin says his actual job is to target schools across the country and recruit more trans.
Here's his boyfriend TheresNoTime locking the article.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... t+Groomers
-
- Sucks Admin
- Posts: 4687
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
- Location: The ass-tral plane
- Has thanked: 1185 times
- Been thanked: 1883 times
Re: "Gays Against Groomers" vs Wikipedia
AAAAGGGGHHHHHHH
Even the worst arbitrations weren't as disgusting (or as LONG and UNREADABLE) as this "argument". And what the hell is Dronebogus doing in there? Why does that smug little patroller "care" so much about gay rights?
TheTranarchist is shaping up to be one of their most toxic content grinders. Does nothing but fight with people over transgender and LGBTQ content since 2021. Dollar sez she'll be RFA nominated by Tamzin someday.
Funny how the people doing the most shrieking about authoritarianism are also the most prone to trying their OWN authoritarian political tricks and abuse, eh? Especially on Wikipedia.
Last edited by ericbarbour on Tue Aug 29, 2023 11:07 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Sucker
- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2023 9:08 am
- Location: The Astral Plane
- Has thanked: 1423 times
- Been thanked: 285 times
Re: "Gays Against Groomers" vs Wikipedia
"Trans rights" actually. Still, I don't know why.ericbarbour wrote: ↑Tue Aug 29, 2023 10:55 pmEven the worst arbitrations weren't as disgusting (or as LONG and UNREADABLE) as this "argument". And what the hell is Dronebogus doing in there? Why does that smug little patroller "care" so much about gay rights?
Reminds of a meme I saw that this generation is the first to think that believing what the establishment believes (neoliberal capitalism, "progressive" imperialism, and milquetoast progressive social politics) is "radical".
"Globally banned" since September 5, 2023 for exposing harassment.