Transgender health care misinformation on Wikipedia

You can talk about anything related to Wikipedia criticism here.
Post Reply
User avatar
boredbird
Sucks Mod
Posts: 652
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2017 3:24 am
Has thanked: 830 times
Been thanked: 406 times

Transgender health care misinformation on Wikipedia

Post by boredbird » Sat Jun 28, 2025 10:05 am

Admit it you wanted it. Another giant trans debate on Wikipedia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... uests/Case

From our friends on some other site.
WPSUICIDEPACT wrote: Because a woman can have a penis. That this is the sticking point for so many people is an education problem, not an ideological one. If you're uncomfortable sharing a changing room with a woman who has a penis then that's a you issue, not an issue for women who don't meet your arbitrary standard of femininity.

User avatar
badmachine
Sucker
Posts: 561
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:55 am
Has thanked: 763 times
Been thanked: 346 times
Contact:

Re: Transgender health care misinformation on Wikipedia

Post by badmachine » Sun Jun 29, 2025 1:19 am

boredbird wrote:
Sat Jun 28, 2025 10:05 am
WPSUICIDEPACT wrote: Because a woman can have a penis
IMG_0132.gif
There’s the problem right there
IMG_0132.gif (743.36 KiB) Viewed 77 times

User avatar
Strelnikov
Sucks Admin
Posts: 1162
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 11:25 pm
Has thanked: 495 times
Been thanked: 297 times

Re: Transgender health care misinformation on Wikipedia

Post by Strelnikov » Sun Jun 29, 2025 1:57 am

badmachine wrote:
Sun Jun 29, 2025 1:19 am
boredbird wrote:
Sat Jun 28, 2025 10:05 am
WPSUICIDEPACT wrote: Because a woman can have a penis
IMG_0132.gif
It's a tiny minority. You aren't Graham "Glinner" Linehan, whose brains were turned to mush through Irish Catholicism, or booze, or losing his ability to be funny, who got so deep in anti-trans activism that his wife (who is the sister of Peter Serafinowicz*) walked.

I see the trans wars as a GOP game to break the weakest link in the long gay chain so they can go on to destroy gay marriage and then finally drive everything back to 1932. This follows their dream to drive race relations back to 1842.


*So he burned his bridges with British comedy on two levels; he can't be hired to write sitcoms, and he can't talk to the people he used to hang around with.
Still "Globally Banned" on Wikipedia for the high crime of journalism.

User avatar
badmachine
Sucker
Posts: 561
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:55 am
Has thanked: 763 times
Been thanked: 346 times
Contact:

Re: Transgender health care misinformation on Wikipedia

Post by badmachine » Sun Jun 29, 2025 4:41 am

It is a slutty waste of political capital on a very unpopular issue.

Look we all knew “that girl”, the drag queen who lived as a woman and everyone humored her but she was a gay man, lots of these transgenders are AMAB “transbians”.

Now we have heterosexual men accessing lesbian beds and it don’t seem right after marching for something good to get served this many years later.

I didn’t march for this and most AFAB lesbians my agE would likely say the same.

These people should get their own movement and see how far it goes instead of glomming onto ours. This image sums up my feeling about it among other things:
IMG_0133.jpeg
IMG_0133.jpeg (64.25 KiB) Viewed 57 times
Last edited by badmachine on Sun Jun 29, 2025 4:59 am, edited 2 times in total.

Post Reply