Describing Wikipedia in 3 words.
-
Ognistysztorm
- Sucks Warrior
- Posts: 550
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2022 1:39 am
- Has thanked: 77 times
- Been thanked: 239 times
-
Carrite
- Sucks Critic
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 3:59 am
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 25 times
Re: Describing Wikipedia in 3 words.
That's 126 words, buddy.ChaosMeRee wrote: ↑Mon Jan 01, 2024 2:34 pmNot an encyclopedia.
Techbro's last stand.
Threat to children.
Run by children.
Bad for you.
Waste of resources.
Waste of money.
Waste of life.
One epic grift.
Jimmy's biggest regret.
$75 an hour.
Hate over hope.
Fantasy over reality.
Hiding its truth.
Protecting its own.
Works in theory.
Broken in practice.
Experiment gone wrong.
Not easily edited.
Definitely a bureaucracy.
Rather obviously biased.
Unreliable for anything.
Used without caution.
Never used correctly.
Jess Wade's pension.
Stephen Harrison's pension.
Infested with activists.
Still easily manipulated.
Not remotely responsible.
Not remotely accountable.
Not remotely diverse.
Not remotely finished.
Incapable of shame.
Undeserving of praise.
Losing brand value.
Marek Kukula's friend.
David Gerard's ethics.
Wikipediocracy's best friend.
America's biggest shame.
Not worth saving.
Overdue violent destruction.
Probably dies slowly.
t
-
ChaosMeRee
- Sucker
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2023 11:59 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 159 times
-
ericbarbour
- Sucks Admin
- Posts: 5136
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
- Location: The ass-tral plane
- Has thanked: 1371 times
- Been thanked: 2115 times