To clarify, I probably got banned from Wikiinaction because EtherMan saw Anyone's post here, or Anyone alerted him to it. The reasons are the same, just a pair of ass wipes who can't win an argument to save their lives, so they don't even try.
EtherMan is a proper dyed the wool Wikipedian. He literally couldn't (or rather refused to) wrap his head around the fact that if you've been told to stay away from a women editor, and you turn up on the same article to "address" her tagging, but don't directly interact with her, then yes, that's still harassment. Especially when the reason you were told to stay away has its origins in you disputing her tagging, which turned into him harassing her when she wouldn't comply and the system didn't make her. She was meant to see it, she was meant to know it was Ritchie, she was meant to understand she is powerless to stop him obsessing about her, following her around the wiki.
That is why the only defence Ritchie offered was that he hadn't even noticed she was the one who tagged her. Clearly hoping that absolute horseshit, contradicted by his own postings on the hate site Wikipediocracy, would somehow fly. The Wikipedians went one better, because protecting harassers when they are popular male Admins, and causing further distress to their victims, especially when they are powerless women editors on the margins of the community, is what they are all about.
I guess now I'm banned from that sub I'll never know how what has to break in someone's head, to be so scummy they can with a straight face not only deny what Ritchie did to Praxidae was a continuance of his harassment campaign, but to actually cast it as "cooperation", something Wikipedia should be encouraging!
Properly sick stuff. Takes an absolutely sick fuck to think like that. People who have absolutely no intention of properly understanding what harassment is and acting to prevent it. As seen by the names of the establishment Wikipedians who went so far as to say it.
I wonder if brave little Timmy will dare defend it........

This is what being a Wikipedia critic is all about. Exposing absolute scum.
Maybe Graaf is right. Maybe their strategy now is to infiltrate all critic spaces, so the criticism doesn't even see the light of day. They've certainly captured Wikipediocracy and Wikiinaction.